Was there ever a Freelander 1 Diesel built without a turbo?

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.

GWOA

New Member
Posts
2
Location
South Lappland, Sweden
Hi!
Sorry for the stupid question in advance.
Today someone told me that he has a Freelander 1 Diesel 2.0 from 2000 without a turbo. Can this be true?
I don't belive it, but you never know...
regards, Christian
 
Would have been a plodder. As the range of engine for the Freelander 1 especially petrol, would have been better alternative.
 
That is how the TD4 boost worked but not certain about the L series. I owned an L series around 18 years ago and was surprised how gutless it was.
Plus how poor the brakes were.
The brakes thing is interesting.

The brake system changed quite a bit in 2000, but before that the K shared the same brakes as the L series.

@htr, with his early K, and me with my L got together here in Chch a while back and one of the topics that came up was brakes. He had always felt his brakes were poor and had put a lot of effort into trying to improve them... uprated discs, different types of pads, lots of bleeding, but without success. The brakes on my L though were noticeably better. Over the years, just about every part in my brake system from the ABS modulator onwards has been replaced, but only with 'standard' (not necessarily genuine, but aftermarket) parts and the braking has been consistent.

It would seem therefore that some cars just brake betterer than others... for reasons unknown.
 
  • Like
Reactions: htr
The brakes thing is interesting.

The brake system changed quite a bit in 2000, but before that the K shared the same brakes as the L series.

@htr, with his early K, and me with my L got together here in Chch a while back and one of the topics that came up was brakes. He had always felt his brakes were poor and had put a lot of effort into trying to improve them... uprated discs, different types of pads, lots of bleeding, but without success. The brakes on my L though were noticeably better. Over the years, just about every part in my brake system from the ABS modulator onwards has been replaced, but only with 'standard' (not necessarily genuine, but aftermarket) parts and the braking has been consistent.

It would seem therefore that some cars just brake betterer than others... for reasons unknown.
The L Series Freelander we had was SWMBO's so I didn't drive it often but every time I did I was surprised at how hard I had to push the brake pedal. She was used to it and has strong legs so never noticed an issue.
Is it possible the issue was the vac pump?
Did they change the brake boost at some time and did he try using one from a TD4?
 
The L Series Freelander we had was SWMBO's so I didn't drive it often but every time I did I was surprised at how hard I had to push the brake pedal. She was used to it and has strong legs so never noticed an issue.
Is it possible the issue was the vac pump?
Did they change the brake boost at some time and did he try using one from a TD4?
Dunno tbh.

I have considered swapping the bits over from my 2001 K Series parts car. Also considered swapping over its vented disks and calipers. But I haven't really felt the need and, although I've done a lot of maintenance on the brakes over the years, I'm quite reluctant to muck around with the braking system.
 
Dunno tbh.

I have considered swapping the bits over from my 2001 K Series parts car. Also considered swapping over its vented disks and calipers. But I haven't really felt the need and, although I've done a lot of maintenance on the brakes over the years, I'm quite reluctant to muck around with the braking system.
You know the rule GG
If it ain't broke, DON'T FIX IT!!! 😆
 
Back
Top