Springelec
Member
- Posts
- 40
What a brilliant reference. Thanks for that link. Although we should always be cautious about accepting Gov data at face value, it has removed some of my uncertainty about using E10. Cheers.Re E10 petrol;
What a brilliant reference. Thanks for that link. Although we should always be cautious about accepting Gov data at face value, it has removed some of my uncertainty about using E10. Cheers.Re E10 petrol;
I will if I keep the modification. This is an engineering experiment and I have asked the garage to put all four bags in a box because they're relatively new and leave everything else in situ, just in case. I like options that can be reversed and this is one of them.@Springelec have you notified your insurance company that you are changing the suspension system to non manufactures spec. Just asking as some have found who have changed to coils have received higher premiums or had their insurance cancelled. Lots oh them don't like modifications which this is classed as. Just something to look into
Au contraire. I am not 'dead set' against EAS, I'm responding to my evidence of five EAS failures in 3-1/2 yrs and let's not forget, every failure costs £££££ if you don't have the time and/or facility to solve the problem yourself and even if you do, that is time I would rather spend doing something else. It's clear we're never going to agree about EAS because we occupy two very different philosophical positions. You appear to enjoy the challenge of maintaining a complicated suspension system whereas, I don't. And that appears to be core of our exchange. My camp consists of spring & damper x 4. Your camp is an assembly of air bags x4, height potentiometers x 4, wiring x4, a digital voltmeter, ADC, DAC embedded in a micro processor plus software to drive the system with error codes, diagnostic tools etc x1, pneumatic pump x1, control valves x4, pneumatic block x 1, air pipes x4, clips (many), O rings (lots), relays (lots). I've made my point, which is why I firmly believe in KISS. (Keep It Simple Stupid). No offence intended by my last remark. It's just an acronym. Cheers.Ergo, a badly fitted exhaust. In my early days of P38 ownership a long time ago, I suffered an EAS fault with a carvan on the hook whilst touring Yorkshire. No place to stop safely in heavy traffic, I did about 50 miles like that on the bump stops to the camp site I was booked in. Uncomfortable but no damage to anything. Cleared the fault indicated as NS front height sensor and it did not fault again and we made it home to France. Investigation showed it was indeed the sensor, erratic readings on an analogue meter. It was full of water due to an O ring failure. No recurrence since it was replaced.
You are obviously dead set on blaming the EAS for any problem and also rely on garages to work on your car which in my experience with other cars when I had a fleet is not always very successful. Most on LZ DIY.
Thanks for this advice. I'll investigate after I get the car back at the end of next week. Cheers.I would invest in the Nanocom for the rest of the car![]()
I won't use it.Re E10 petrol;
You won't use this Gov web site or E10 ??.I won't use it.
why not? i used it long term, never had an issueI won't use it.
yes its more of an issue in smaller engines and anything not used oftenI won't use it either
In fact, we don't use it in our mowers or other small engines like the kids bikes![]()
I use V power even, in the garden equipment.why not? i used it long term, never had an issue
I'm responding to my evidence of five EAS failures in 3-1/2 yrs
We use it on the small engines to maintain as much power as possible. The ethanol content isn't good for standing fuel systems either, as kermistormer says.To E10 or not to E10, that is the question. So for a thickie like me, why is E10 bad for small engines but OK for big ones ??. Surely all petrol engines are fuel equal or are some engines more equal than others ??.
The EAS is very simple and with diagnostics in the car, most times a fault can be cleared in minutes to get you on your way. It's very cheap to fix but only if you DIY and as Marjon said, if properly overhauled, it rarely fails. Few garages know anything about the EAS or the P38 in general.I am not trying to blame EAS for all the problems with my P38, just the ones caused by EAS failure and there have been more than I would have expected. All cars have problems but, they only become painful when they become unmanageable by way of cost or any other reason. My experience has shown me EAS is a recurring and unmanageable problem and it should be removed. For example, my Jag XJR was purchased knowing it could have a Nikasil problem but, two facts convinced me to buy it. 1) I had it pressure tested before purchase and 2) the UK stopped selling high sulphur petrol a few years before purchasing the car. Ipso facto: No sulphur - No Nikasil failure and I ran that car to 125K miles before it burst a gasket. I'm very happy that EAS failure is no more than an inconvenience for some but, it's a recurring economic headache for me because the car is unusable when it breaks and it costs me serious time and money getting it fixed. I like my P38 but, my surname is not Rockefeller and putting mpg aside, I have to find a cost effective way to own this car without it financial destroying me.
You seem to be. Exhaust breaking, diff pan holeI am not trying to blame EAS for all the problems with my P38,
Nikasil coated liners is totally different to LR V8 issue with slipped linersFor example, my Jag XJR was purchased knowing it could have a Nikasil problem but, two facts convinced me to buy it. 1) I had it pressure tested before purchase and 2) the UK stopped selling high sulphur petrol a few years before purchasing the car. Ipso facto: No sulphur - No Nikasil failure and I ran that car to 125K miles before it burst a gasket.
my surname is not Rockefeller
I have to find a cost effective way to own this car without it financial destroying me.
Everyone has their preferences. I dislike the split rear tailgate, it makes reaching to the back of the boot a real stretch plus the short upper section does nothing to keep the rain off. Much preferred the one piece tailgate on my Volvo.I'll let everyone know after suspension surgery next week. I owned a Disco 2 immediately before the P38, so it'll be interesting to compare the experience. The Disco 2 was too slow and I came to really dislike the rear door. The double rear hatches on the P38 are much more user friendly but, the bloke who purchased my Disco 2 preferred it to the P38. Horses for courses again.![]()
Welcome To LandyZone, the Land Rover Forums!
Here at LandyZone we have plenty of very knowledgable members so if you have any questions about your Land Rover or just want to connect with other Landy owners, you're in the right place.
Registering is free and easy just click here, we hope to see you on the forums soon!