www.car-maintenance.org

[email protected] wrote:

> Darren <[email protected]> wrote in message
> <[email protected]>:
>
>
>
>>I'm sure most people would take offence more with your language and lack
>>of common courtesy than a polite invitation to look at a website that
>>is, again, to do with the subject matter of the groups it was posted to.
>>There aren't any age restrictions on usenet so I think your reply is
>>very irresponsible.
>
>
> Do you think they'd find it offensive if I called you a dull ****?

Yes, without doubt. I didn't realise I had met you personally?

SteveH wrote:

> Darren <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>>>Darren www.spamming-****.org Admin
>>>
>>>
>>>**** off you spamming ****.
>>>
>>
>>I'm sorry I couldn't get the www.spamming-****.org link to work. Are you
>>sure you typed it correctly?
>>
>>I don't consider my original post to be spam, in what way is it not to
>>do with the subject matter of all of the groups I posted it to?
>>
>>I'm sure most people would take offence more with your language and lack
>>of common courtesy than a polite invitation to look at a website that
>>is, again, to do with the subject matter of the groups it was posted to.
>>There aren't any age restrictions on usenet so I think your reply is
>>very irresponsible.
>
>
> Oh, do **** off with that attitude.
>
> You deliberately spammed usenet to draw traffic to your pathetic site.
>
> You're also guilty of cross-posting to inappropriate groups. A single
> post to maintenance you may have got away with, but 8 groups is taking
> the **** more than a little.
>
> In terms of language, this is usenet and is to be expected, usenet isn't
> a place for kids, it would be an irresponsible parent that allowed
> unsupervised access to usenet.
I consider my attitude far more colloquial than yours.

Again, I don't consider a post relating to the subject matter of the
group spam. If you do then fair enough but you should be prepared to not
have every single post you read follow your own rules, this is usenet
and is to be expected. I cross-posted to appropriate groups, an
inappropriate group would be A.B.P.Sex.Fetish but I consider that
spamming so I didnt.

I don't expect language like that on usenet, on a website that has a
warning maybe. Do you believe that every impressionable child using a
computer on the internet is supervised?

Lastly, glad you think my "pathetic site" is worthy of your attention, I
would question how pathetic it can be when compared to
www.italiancar.co.uk but I wouldnt wish to sink to your level.

Darren <[email protected]> wrote:

> Lastly, glad you think my "pathetic site" is worthy of your attention, I
> would question how pathetic it can be when compared to
> www.italiancar.co.uk but I wouldnt wish to sink to your level.

Difference is that I don't go spamming my site to the whole of Usenet.
It exists only as a photo site for those interested, mainly those who've
been at the occasions in the photos.

--
Steve H 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
http://www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - MZ ETZ300
VW Golf GL Cabrio - Alfa 75 TS - Alfa 155 TS Lusso - COSOC KOTL
BoTAFOT #87 - BoTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #

Darren <[email protected]> wrote:

> Lastly, glad you think my "pathetic site" is worthy of your attention, I
> would question how pathetic it can be when compared to
> www.italiancar.co.uk but I wouldnt wish to sink to your level.

Difference is that I don't go spamming my site to the whole of Usenet.
It exists only as a photo site for those interested, mainly those who've
been at the occasions in the photos.

--
Steve H 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
http://www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - MZ ETZ300
VW Golf GL Cabrio - Alfa 75 TS - Alfa 155 TS Lusso - COSOC KOTL
BoTAFOT #87 - BoTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #

SteveH wrote:

> Darren <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>Lastly, glad you think my "pathetic site" is worthy of your attention, I
>>would question how pathetic it can be when compared to
>>www.italiancar.co.uk but I wouldnt wish to sink to your level.
>
>
> Difference is that I don't go spamming my site to the whole of Usenet.
> It exists only as a photo site for those interested, mainly those who've
> been at the occasions in the photos.
>
And there lies the issue, as it is to everyone else but yourself that
this was not spamming, it wasnt commercial, it wasnt off-topic and it
wasnt excessive. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newsgroup_spam should
educate you.

SteveH wrote:

> Darren <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>Lastly, glad you think my "pathetic site" is worthy of your attention, I
>>would question how pathetic it can be when compared to
>>www.italiancar.co.uk but I wouldnt wish to sink to your level.
>
>
> Difference is that I don't go spamming my site to the whole of Usenet.
> It exists only as a photo site for those interested, mainly those who've
> been at the occasions in the photos.
>
And there lies the issue, as it is to everyone else but yourself that
this was not spamming, it wasnt commercial, it wasnt off-topic and it
wasnt excessive. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newsgroup_spam should
educate you.

"Darren" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

> I don't expect language like that on usenet, on a website that has a
> warning maybe. Do you believe that every impressionable child using a
> computer on the internet is supervised?

You're talking about a section of the internet which has groups full of porn
binaries etc., amongst other things - and it's all unregulated (at least to
a certain extent) - but most importantly, it is as easy to access NGs like
those, as it is this one, and not being funny, but I somehow doubt that the
first NG an impressional child will scan for, is one for car maintenance.

If your child is likely to read this NG and you give a feck as to what
blasphemous content it contains, well then more fool you for not exercising
your parental responsibilities.

HTH

--
JackH

JackH wrote:

> "Darren" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>
>>I don't expect language like that on usenet, on a website that has a
>>warning maybe. Do you believe that every impressionable child using a
>>computer on the internet is supervised?
>
>
> You're talking about a section of the internet which has groups full of porn
> binaries etc., amongst other things - and it's all unregulated (at least to
> a certain extent) - but most importantly, it is as easy to access NGs like
> those, as it is this one, and not being funny, but I somehow doubt that the
> first NG an impressional child will scan for, is one for car maintenance.
>
> If your child is likely to read this NG and you give a feck as to what
> blasphemous content it contains, well then more fool you for not exercising
> your parental responsibilities.
>
> HTH
>
> --
> JackH
>
>
>
Agreed, just making a point.

"Darren" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...

> I don't expect language like that on usenet, on a website that has a
> warning maybe. Do you believe that every impressionable child using a
> computer on the internet is supervised?

You're talking about a section of the internet which has groups full of porn
binaries etc., amongst other things - and it's all unregulated (at least to
a certain extent) - but most importantly, it is as easy to access NGs like
those, as it is this one, and not being funny, but I somehow doubt that the
first NG an impressional child will scan for, is one for car maintenance.

If your child is likely to read this NG and you give a feck as to what
blasphemous content it contains, well then more fool you for not exercising
your parental responsibilities.

HTH

--
JackH

Darren <[email protected]> wrote:

> > Difference is that I don't go spamming my site to the whole of Usenet.
> > It exists only as a photo site for those interested, mainly those who've
> > been at the occasions in the photos.
> >
> And there lies the issue, as it is to everyone else but yourself that
> this was not spamming, it wasnt commercial, it wasnt off-topic and it
> wasnt excessive. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newsgroup_spam should
> educate you.

Yes, and that link proves what?

You're obviously new to Usenet, so I suggest you **** off back to where
you came from taking your ****ty 'bulletin board' with you.

I've been around on Usenet long enough to know spam when I see it.
--
Steve H 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
http://www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - MZ ETZ300
VW Golf GL Cabrio - Alfa 75 TS - Alfa 155 TS Lusso - COSOC KOTL
BoTAFOT #87 - BoTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #

"Darren" wrote

>> In terms of language, this is usenet and is to be expected, usenet isn't
>> a place for kids, it would be an irresponsible parent that allowed
>> unsupervised access to usenet.
> I consider my attitude far more colloquial than yours.

Thats nice, I'm off to find a ****ing dictionary.

> Again, I don't consider a post relating to the subject matter of the group
> spam. If you do then fair enough but you should be prepared to not have
> every single post you read follow your own rules, this is usenet and is to
> be expected. I cross-posted to appropriate groups, an inappropriate group
> would be A.B.P.Sex.Fetish but I consider that spamming so I didnt.
>
> Do you believe that every impressionable child using a computer on the
> internet is supervised?

Nope, do you?

> Lastly, glad you think my "pathetic site" is worthy of your attention, I
> would question how pathetic it can be when compared to
> www.italiancar.co.uk but I wouldnt wish to sink to your level.

All very well, however SteveH's site isn't punted to militant usenetters as
a developing resource for anything. I doubt anyone has ever said it was
anything other than Pathetic (c:

Douglas

\Douglas Payne <[email protected]> wrote:

> > Lastly, glad you think my "pathetic site" is worthy of your attention, I
> > would question how pathetic it can be when compared to
> > www.italiancar.co.uk but I wouldnt wish to sink to your level.
>
> All very well, however SteveH's site isn't punted to militant usenetters as
> a developing resource for anything. I doubt anyone has ever said it was
> anything other than Pathetic (c:

Heh. I know it's pathetic. I can't code HTML to save my life, but what I
do a lot of is taking photos. Which is all my 'site' is - just somewhere
to stuff photos for interested parties to look at.
--
Steve H 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
http://www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - MZ ETZ300
VW Golf GL Cabrio - Alfa 75 TS - Alfa 155 TS Lusso - COSOC KOTL
BoTAFOT #87 - BoTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #

JackH wrote:

> "Darren" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>
>
>>I don't expect language like that on usenet, on a website that has a
>>warning maybe. Do you believe that every impressionable child using a
>>computer on the internet is supervised?
>
>
> You're talking about a section of the internet which has groups full of porn
> binaries etc., amongst other things - and it's all unregulated (at least to
> a certain extent) - but most importantly, it is as easy to access NGs like
> those, as it is this one, and not being funny, but I somehow doubt that the
> first NG an impressional child will scan for, is one for car maintenance.
>
> If your child is likely to read this NG and you give a feck as to what
> blasphemous content it contains, well then more fool you for not exercising
> your parental responsibilities.
>
> HTH
>
> --
> JackH
>
>
>
Agreed, just making a point.

SteveH wrote:

> Darren <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>
>>>Difference is that I don't go spamming my site to the whole of Usenet.
>>>It exists only as a photo site for those interested, mainly those who've
>>>been at the occasions in the photos.
>>>
>>
>>And there lies the issue, as it is to everyone else but yourself that
>>this was not spamming, it wasnt commercial, it wasnt off-topic and it
>>wasnt excessive. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newsgroup_spam should
>>educate you.
>
>
> Yes, and that link proves what?
>
> You're obviously new to Usenet, so I suggest you **** off back to where
> you came from taking your ****ty 'bulletin board' with you.
>
> I've been around on Usenet long enough to know spam when I see it.

When usenet first started I remember getting a bit disappointed with how
much it was going downhill, been away from it so long I had forgotten
why I didnt use it anymore. Thanks for reminding me.

The link proves what is and what isnt spamming, your own personal
opinion in this case means nothing I'm afraid.

I would say that I'm sure I've been around usenet longer than you but I
find cock competitions a little vulgar and also, how the hell would I
know how long you've been using it?

I didn't realise you are the administrator of the uk.rec. groups, now I
know that I'll comply with everything you say because you obviously have
more right to post here than I do.

SteveH wrote:
> Darren <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>>> Difference is that I don't go spamming my site to the whole of
>>> Usenet. It exists only as a photo site for those interested, mainly
>>> those who've been at the occasions in the photos.
>>>
>> And there lies the issue, as it is to everyone else but yourself that
>> this was not spamming, it wasnt commercial, it wasnt off-topic and it
>> wasnt excessive. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newsgroup_spam should
>> educate you.
>
> Yes, and that link proves what?
>
> You're obviously new to Usenet, so I suggest you **** off back to
> where
> you came from taking your ****ty 'bulletin board' with you.
>

Its amazing what a theme can do for phpBB, have a look at
www.retro-renault.com/forum

> I've been around on Usenet long enough to know spam when I see it.

We don't get spam on www.retro-renault.com

We have some useful tech articles on www.retro-renault.com

You can find them at http://www.retro-renault.com/forum/index.php?c=4

www.1916v.info

www.renaultsportsclub.com

www.renault-turbo.com



I ****in love these spam threads




--
Chet
http://www.retro-renault.com
1991 HF Integrale 16v - Gettin there!
1993 Renault 19 16v - Subtle extras like a T3
1998 Audi A4 - I don't know why, but i did.

Douglas Payne wrote:


>
> Thats nice, I'm off to find a ****ing dictionary.
>
I dont get all the offensive posting, whats happened to net-iquette?
>
>
> All very well, however SteveH's site isn't punted to militant usenetters as
> a developing resource for anything. I doubt anyone has ever said it was
> anything other than Pathetic (c:
>
> Douglas
>
>
Does being a militant usenetter mean you just swear a lot and try and be
as offensive as possible? It never used to be

Darren wrote:

> Does being a militant usenetter mean you just swear a lot and try and be
> as offensive as possible? It never used to be

****wit...

--
Grunff

Darren <[email protected]> wrote:

> > Difference is that I don't go spamming my site to the whole of Usenet.
> > It exists only as a photo site for those interested, mainly those who've
> > been at the occasions in the photos.
> >
> And there lies the issue, as it is to everyone else but yourself that
> this was not spamming, it wasnt commercial, it wasnt off-topic and it
> wasnt excessive. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Newsgroup_spam should
> educate you.

Yes, and that link proves what?

You're obviously new to Usenet, so I suggest you **** off back to where
you came from taking your ****ty 'bulletin board' with you.

I've been around on Usenet long enough to know spam when I see it.
--
Steve H 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
http://www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - MZ ETZ300
VW Golf GL Cabrio - Alfa 75 TS - Alfa 155 TS Lusso - COSOC KOTL
BoTAFOT #87 - BoTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #

Darren <[email protected]> wrote:

> > Yes, and that link proves what?
> >
> > You're obviously new to Usenet, so I suggest you **** off back to where
> > you came from taking your ****ty 'bulletin board' with you.
> >
> > I've been around on Usenet long enough to know spam when I see it.
>
> When usenet first started I remember getting a bit disappointed with how
> much it was going downhill, been away from it so long I had forgotten
> why I didnt use it anymore. Thanks for reminding me.

Eh? - Do you know _anything_ about Usenet - if you did you wouldn't use
such a ****witted expression as 'when usenet first started'.
>
> The link proves what is and what isnt spamming, your own personal
> opinion in this case means nothing I'm afraid.

All that link proves is one site's definition of spam.

In reality, Spam is any unwanted posting advertising an inappropriate
product / service / site.

Advertising a Bulletin Board (and a **** one at that) on a Usenet group
could well be considered inappropriate, and therefore spam.

Cross posting to several groups is most definitely spam. I'm actually
surprised it got past the German server's spam filters - but they're not
what they used to be.

> I would say that I'm sure I've been around usenet longer than you but I
> find cock competitions a little vulgar and also, how the hell would I
> know how long you've been using it?

It's funny, isn't it, you've just popped up from nowhere advertising
your own site. No posting history to any of the groups I subscribe to,
but yet you saw fit to spam the groups with your website.

> I didn't realise you are the administrator of the uk.rec. groups, now I
> know that I'll comply with everything you say because you obviously have
> more right to post here than I do.

No-one is an admistrator, but some people posting to Usenet feel that
it's worth upholding the basic principles of the groups they subscribe
to.
--
Steve H 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
http://www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - MZ ETZ300
VW Golf GL Cabrio - Alfa 75 TS - Alfa 155 TS Lusso - COSOC KOTL
BoTAFOT #87 - BoTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #

"Darren" wrote

>> In terms of language, this is usenet and is to be expected, usenet isn't
>> a place for kids, it would be an irresponsible parent that allowed
>> unsupervised access to usenet.
> I consider my attitude far more colloquial than yours.

Thats nice, I'm off to find a ****ing dictionary.

> Again, I don't consider a post relating to the subject matter of the group
> spam. If you do then fair enough but you should be prepared to not have
> every single post you read follow your own rules, this is usenet and is to
> be expected. I cross-posted to appropriate groups, an inappropriate group
> would be A.B.P.Sex.Fetish but I consider that spamming so I didnt.
>
> Do you believe that every impressionable child using a computer on the
> internet is supervised?

Nope, do you?

> Lastly, glad you think my "pathetic site" is worthy of your attention, I
> would question how pathetic it can be when compared to
> www.italiancar.co.uk but I wouldnt wish to sink to your level.

All very well, however SteveH's site isn't punted to militant usenetters as
a developing resource for anything. I doubt anyone has ever said it was
anything other than Pathetic (c:

Douglas