Bounty
Well-Known Member
- Posts
- 255
- Location
- Cheshire, United Kingdom
I suppose it might be a problem if you get a puncture in the middle of nowhere and its pouring with rain, but shouldn't be to much of a problem if you're in town to get to a tyre shop.Yes indeed. Really two spare tyres are needed, one for the LHS and one for the RHS.
As long as the G4 is a post 2001, then there's no issues with a swap like that. You'll need what the Yanks call the front clip, basically everything from the front, which is connected to the front sub-frame. So engine (obviously), gearbox (again obviously), the IRD, the front suspension, the propshafts and VCU, and the front driveshafts. It would also be sensible to switch over the ABS modulator, just in case the programming is different on a V6. You'll need the gear selector assembly, and the auto brake pedal, along with all the V6 engine electrical system, immobiliser, key transponder and maybe the dash, although I suspect that's the same.Might have bought a 1.8 G4 in Tangiers. Subject to a look see.
Considering buying a crashed V6 and doing a transplant?? Major problems?
V6 engine electrical system, immobiliser, key transponder and maybe the dash, although I suspect that's the same
I expect you'll get away with just changing the engine bay harness.Any information about the wiring loom. Hope to either get away with engine bay loom
You might not need to go as far as the dash harness.and maybe engine bay to dash
Hoping just to change instrument panel.
That's common to 1.8 and V6.Fuel tank and pump arrangements?
Sell on the stuff you don't want.Will do a load of research before commencing. The 1.8 has had loads of work done hg, belts etc. and a new clutch so will run it for a while.
It'll be cheaper to do a V6 swap, as paint is an expensive business these days.Might be easier to respray my V6, but not so much fun
Last question.... For now!!As long as the G4 is a post 2001, then there's no issues with a swap like that.
I wish I could find a bargain like that. I'm a fan of the KV6 myself, having owned 3 vehicles fitted with it.It's number 7. G4 viewing next week. Just brought V6 home. Lovely car. Used no water on the 5 mile trip but can hear hissing!! When it stops tipping it down I'll be onto it. 72k from new, 3/4 tank of fuel, towbar, SE trim, silver with no dents. For less than the price of 3 tanks of fuel!!
The 2.5 is better, as it has more torque, with a similar fuel usage.We had a 2.0 litre KV6 powered Rover 75 - a really lovely car with a gorgeously smooth and sonorous engine. Not especially powerful or torquey in that application, but I could easily forgive it that foible
I'm surprised by that. What's the reason for it not complying?I'd love to have another - but sadly they're not ULEZ friendly
The 2.5 is definitely the pick of the bunch. We only got the 2.0 litre because that was what was available at the time It was replaced by the CDTi ZTT, but I always felt the 2.5 KV6 powered car was the nicer steerThe 2.5 is better, as it has more torque, with a similar fuel usage.
Unlike the 1.8, it has a too-high NOx rating on its EU3 homologationI'm surprised by that. What's the reason for it not complying?
The 2.5 is definitely the pick of the bunch.
Welcome To LandyZone, the Land Rover Forums!
Here at LandyZone we have plenty of very knowledgable members so if you have any questions about your Land Rover or just want to connect with other Landy owners, you're in the right place.
Registering is free and easy just click here, we hope to see you on the forums soon!