Q's regarding Suspension for Suzuki Sierra

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.

> Most modern SUVs have IFS, which translates as less front axle

articulation
> and less mobility.


And Landrovers have less ground clearence than Unimogs...... Comparing a
Series Landrover to a current SUV is not exactly a fair comparison of
purpose or intent is it?

That said, ultimate articulation is very rarely the determinant of where you
get to on the trail, there is most usually another way, so this is really
only relevant in some sort of artificial competition environment.

The fact that axles, spring hangers, springs, etc genrally do not break in
Japanese vehicles subjected to normal use when the same things do in fact
break on series Landrovers in the same conditions is a reasonable indication
of fitness for purpose.

I have no particular memory of the low range on Landrovers conferring any
particular additional capability, I remember it more as a failed
compensation for inadequate power availability.

That said, my wagon was afflicted with Series III, 1 ton ute drive
mechanicals (which ignoring the really early stuff are the lowest ratio
Series gearing in the business) which gave (with O/D off) a top speed of 52
mph at the redline of the 4 pot diesel which was not IIRC compensated by any
great amount of increased offroad capability other than the fact that in L4
you could leave it in gear idling and have a ****, light a smoke scratch
your balls and not have to work up a sweat to catch it.

The only time this ever came in handy was for crossing rivers (after the
wagon was converted to a soft top) you could sit on the roll bar and steer
with your feet and have a very good view of the upcoming terrain.


> The soft top Landie (the ones i prefer) is lighter and hence easier to

winch
> around. making it easier to get out of problems.
> The Landie final drive ratio is generally lower than the modern SUVs,
> providing better low range use.
> >
> > Also, what do you mean when you say "is easier to fix on the trail"?
> >

> If your EFI goes on the trail in a modern SUV, or any electric control
> modules, you're pretty well stuffed. with a Landie there are no such
> electronics, if something goes wrong you don't need a computer science
> degree to fix it on the spot.


BUT. The EFI system on the modern vehicle is fundamentally less likely to
**** itself than the points coil and associated Lucas bastardry fitted to a
Series Landrover. I simply don't recall having to do *any* emergency
electrical work since getting rid of the last Landrover.

Your point does admittedly have some validity, but if you look at the
overall "****offedness" factor, having one total failure in the life of the
vehicle that may require specialist assistance is probably preferable to
setting out on every journey knowing that at some point you are going to
have to fix the bastard.

>
> simplicty is a virtue when 100Km+ from the nearest garage.
>
> As to breaking axles and drivetrain compodents, doesn't your mange rover
> have a V8? thats far more torque than nessesary, a Holden straight six has
> all the power you need, and no computers to go south on you, while not
> producing surplus torque to make pretzels of your axle.
> >


I did not own the infamous "Mange Rover, that is another participant. I did
however own a V8 powered Landrover, a hybrid concoction consisting of a
British Army model forward control Land Rover (which ended up on evaluation
at the army base near where I lived at the time and was subsequently
auctioned off in very, very sad condition) to which had been fitted Range
Rover running gear and a P76 V8. It was called "The Animal".

"The Animal" didn't ever actually break very much (other than people's
spirit). It was simply scary being blessed with little directional stability
(my fault) combined with excess power and the ability to reach (by virtue of
the already light forward control body being converted to soft top)
absolutely insane speeds. Off road it had good capability, but may I say
that you have not truly experienced "thrilling" 4WDing until you do it
forward of the front axle. there should be a club.....

Whoops forgot for a moment. In some ways it was fun. But every time I get
back onto the black stuff now after a days outing, crank up a nice soothing
classical CD and sit back listening to it on the way home, secure in the
knowledge that the only "cost" of my day's 4wding yet to be paid will be a
trip through the local car wash and not a couple of evenings underneath it
fixing what broke I wonder that anyone still bothers with them.






Tony Smith


 
rnf2 <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Tony Smith" <[email protected]> wrote
>
> > Please define what you mean as "capable".
> >

> Most modern SUVs have IFS, which translates as less front axle

articulation
> and less mobility.
> The soft top Landie (the ones i prefer) is lighter and hence easier to

winch
> around. making it easier to get out of problems.
> The Landie final drive ratio is generally lower than the modern SUVs,
> providing better low range use.
> >
> > Also, what do you mean when you say "is easier to fix on the trail"?
> >

> If your EFI goes on the trail in a modern SUV, or any electric control
> modules, you're pretty well stuffed. with a Landie there are no such
> electronics, if something goes wrong you don't need a computer science
> degree to fix it on the spot.


I'd rather be playing with the points/carby on my 89 Patrol than rebuilding
a Landrover gearbox on the side of a hill.
And unless you're American, or talking about Falcodore utes stop using the
term SUV, we have 4WD's instead.

> simplicty is a virtue when 100Km+ from the nearest garage.
>
> As to breaking axles and drivetrain compodents, doesn't your mange rover
> have a V8? thats far more torque than nessesary, a Holden straight six has
> all the power you need, and no computers to go south on you, while not
> producing surplus torque to make pretzels of your axle.
> >
> > Tony Smith


Had the Holden straight six in my S2A and it broke axles too, the 3.9V8 was
great for torque and 34 inch tyres didn't help but I run the same tyres now
on my Patrol, hammer it just as hard and don't break axles in it. Besides if
I didn't want the power and torque mudrunning would be little fun in a
sidevalve S1.

--
Pat
Brisbane, Australia
http://homepage.powerup.com.au/~mangey/
Who needs lockers when you got secondaries.

VH4000-> CL3500/4300-> GH2600-> S2A2300/3000->
GJ1600/2000->RR3500/3900 ->GQ4200


 
rnf2 <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Tony Smith" <[email protected]> wrote
>
> > Please define what you mean as "capable".
> >

> Most modern SUVs have IFS, which translates as less front axle

articulation
> and less mobility.
> The soft top Landie (the ones i prefer) is lighter and hence easier to

winch
> around. making it easier to get out of problems.
> The Landie final drive ratio is generally lower than the modern SUVs,
> providing better low range use.


The Landy might as well have the diffs welded to the chassis as far as
articulation goes, need to get rid of 3 leaves per spring.
Unless you got Lockers articulation is the best chance you got.

--
Pat
Brisbane, Australia
http://homepage.powerup.com.au/~mangey/
Who needs lockers when you got secondaries.

VH4000-> CL3500/4300-> GH2600-> S2A2300/3000->
GJ1600/2000->RR3500/3900 ->GQ4200


 

"Rainbow Warrior" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I didn't want the power and torque mudrunning would be little fun in a
> sidevalve S1.
>

God....I'd forgotten the real oldies had side-valves.

I remember the shock of discovering the Inlet over Exhaust arrangement on
the Rover 6..... I'm still wondering why they did it that way.... There were
of course probably perfectly sound (English) engineering reasons for doing
it that way.

Still, with either no muffler or a stuffed muffler they had to be the best
sounding engine, pity the reality of performance didn't match the promise of
that sound.



Tony Smith




 
Tony Smith <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "Rainbow Warrior" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > I didn't want the power and torque mudrunning would be little fun in a
> > sidevalve S1.
> >

> God....I'd forgotten the real oldies had side-valves.
>
> I remember the shock of discovering the Inlet over Exhaust arrangement on
> the Rover 6..... I'm still wondering why they did it that way.... There

were
> of course probably perfectly sound (English) engineering reasons for doing
> it that way.
>
> Still, with either no muffler or a stuffed muffler they had to be the best
> sounding engine, pity the reality of performance didn't match the promise

of
> that sound.
>
> Tony Smith


After driving the 6cylinder Landrover, I went with the 4cyl, at least it
would do 100kph.

--
Pat
Brisbane, Australia
http://homepage.powerup.com.au/~mangey/
Who needs lockers when you got secondaries.

VH4000-> CL3500/4300-> GH2600-> S2A2300/3000->
GJ1600/2000->RR3500/3900 ->GQ4200


 
Who really gives a rats arse what some of you like or dis-like?
Start a new thread called "DICKSIZING & brands of 4WD" if you like..........
A guy (Trentus) originally asks for som advise on Sierra suspension & other
components and the thread becomes more of a dicksizing exercise likes &
dislikes of particular marques of 4WD's.
Bottom line is, we (the real drivers of 4WD's) should have enough maturity
to accept any type of 4WD out there on the tracks. After all, it's that's
owners pride & joy and good on him for selecting that make of 4WD for what
ever the reason.
I'm hitting some tracks tomorrow with my son. If I see another brother out
there in a 4WD enjoying the same recreational pleasure that I enjoy,
regardless of the 4WD brand symbol on his radiator grill, he'll still get a
friendly wave from me.
Cheers,
J



 

"OptusNET News" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Who really gives a rats arse what some of you like or dis-like?
> Start a new thread called "DICKSIZING & brands of 4WD" if you

like..........
> A guy (Trentus) originally asks for som advise on Sierra

suspension & other
> components and the thread becomes more of a dicksizing exercise

likes &
> dislikes of particular marques of 4WD's.


You're new to this newsgroup thing yet aren't you.

> Bottom line is, we (the real drivers of 4WD's) should have enough

maturity
> to accept any type of 4WD out there on the tracks. After all, it's

that's
> owners pride & joy and good on him for selecting that make of 4WD

for what
> ever the reason.


Very good sentiments, and I agree with you wholeheartedly.

> I'm hitting some tracks tomorrow with my son. If I see another

brother out
> there in a 4WD enjoying the same recreational pleasure that I

enjoy,
> regardless of the 4WD brand symbol on his radiator grill, he'll

still get a
> friendly wave from me.
> Cheers,


And I'll cheerfully wave back.


.... unless of course you're one of those sad cases in a Landrover,
in which case I'll just scowl at you .

Rob


 
Rob2 wrote:
> ... unless of course you're one of those sad cases in a Landrover,
> in which case I'll just scowl at you .


That's what those bastards do when they see my Vitara scrambling around in
something dirty!

ant


 
There are perhaps 3 basic reasons for waveing at another 4wd
1. You feel like it
2. To let them know you're ok
3. Insurance in case you've got a problem. You can always tell someone who's
never been bush, when you wave they scowl as if to say "what the hell do you
want?"

But , err....you wouldn't want to be helped by a Landie driver ? Personally
I don't mind who stops and offers assistance. Crikey, I'll wave at a bloody
Volvo driver :)))


Rob2 <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> "OptusNET News" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Who really gives a rats arse what some of you like or dis-like?
> > Start a new thread called "DICKSIZING & brands of 4WD" if you

> like..........
> > A guy (Trentus) originally asks for som advise on Sierra

> suspension & other
> > components and the thread becomes more of a dicksizing exercise

> likes &
> > dislikes of particular marques of 4WD's.

>
> You're new to this newsgroup thing yet aren't you.
>
> > Bottom line is, we (the real drivers of 4WD's) should have enough

> maturity
> > to accept any type of 4WD out there on the tracks. After all, it's

> that's
> > owners pride & joy and good on him for selecting that make of 4WD

> for what
> > ever the reason.

>
> Very good sentiments, and I agree with you wholeheartedly.
>
> > I'm hitting some tracks tomorrow with my son. If I see another

> brother out
> > there in a 4WD enjoying the same recreational pleasure that I

> enjoy,
> > regardless of the 4WD brand symbol on his radiator grill, he'll

> still get a
> > friendly wave from me.
> > Cheers,

>
> And I'll cheerfully wave back.
>
>
> ... unless of course you're one of those sad cases in a Landrover,
> in which case I'll just scowl at you .
>
> Rob
>
>



 


Jim wrote:
>
> There are perhaps 3 basic reasons for waveing at another 4wd
> 1. You feel like it
> 2. To let them know you're ok
> 3. Insurance in case you've got a problem. You can always tell someone who's
> never been bush, when you wave they scowl as if to say "what the hell do you
> want?"
>
> But , err....you wouldn't want to be helped by a Landie driver ? Personally
> I don't mind who stops and offers assistance. Crikey, I'll wave at a bloody
> Volvo driver :)))
>



Is true enough
but you have to remember to confiscate and destroy any photo evidence]

reminds me of the "I have 4WD and can go anywhere" ungratful bitch who
thought an L300 van could go over the rocks(can't remember which ones
now) on Fraser, of course when she bottomed out and got stuck we all
stopped to help
started to drag her foward but the front bash plate was being bent and
scratched , but dragging her back was not an option as it would have
caused much greater damage, so on hearing the bash plate tearing over
the rocks she starts screaming at us, telling us what a bunch of usless
****wits we where and how we knew nothing about 4WDing

she was still screaming at us as we unhooked our strap and left her on
the rocks
We stopped to rescue her from her own stupidity, she was told to take
the L300 around the rocks not over, but she told them to **** off as she
knew what she was doing, a few scratches on a bash plate was all she was
risking

I think even just a "Thanks Mate" is appreciated when you stop to help,
and knowing that if you get stuck they will stop and help you

but some people are just stuck up arrogant arseholes who deserve all
they get

I know we had a great 3 days

Kev
 

"Jim" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> There are perhaps 3 basic reasons for waveing at another 4wd
> 1. You feel like it
> 2. To let them know you're ok
> 3. Insurance in case you've got a problem. You can always tell

someone who's
> never been bush, when you wave they scowl as if to say "what the

hell do you
> want?"
>
> But , err....you wouldn't want to be helped by a Landie driver ?

Personally
> I don't mind who stops and offers assistance. Crikey, I'll wave at

a bloody
> Volvo driver :)))
>


It was just my mediocre attempt at humour, in response to J's little
rant.

To answer your question, I'd accept help from a Landie driver if I
needed it. Luckily though, as I drive "jap crap" that's a very
unlikely scenario. :)

Rob


 
Approximately 11/15/03 13:58, Jim uttered for posterity:

> There are perhaps 3 basic reasons for waveing at another 4wd
> 1. You feel like it
> 2. To let them know you're ok
> 3. Insurance in case you've got a problem. You can always tell someone who's
> never been bush, when you wave they scowl as if to say "what the hell do you
> want?"
>

4. Driver has big jugs.

--
My governor can kick your governor's ass

 
On Thu, 13 Nov 2003 20:47:23 +1000, "Tony Smith" <[email protected]> wrote:

>God....I'd forgotten the real oldies had side-valves.
>
>I remember the shock of discovering the Inlet over Exhaust arrangement on
>the Rover 6..... I'm still wondering why they did it that way.... There were
>of course probably perfectly sound (English) engineering reasons for doing
>it that way.


American, too. F heads were used on the Wiley's jeep too, and other US cars.

The idea was that you could use much larger inlet valves, with the technology of
the day, and get better power and economy.

The pom's just keep on with it for longer, being bankrupt.
cheers,

Paul Saccani
Perth West Australia
 

"Paul Saccani" <[email protected]> wrote
>
> >God....I'd forgotten the real oldies had side-valves.
> >
> >I remember the shock of discovering the Inlet over Exhaust arrangement on
> >the Rover 6..... I'm still wondering why they did it that way.... There

were
> >of course probably perfectly sound (English) engineering reasons for

doing
> >it that way.

>
> American, too. F heads were used on the Wiley's jeep too, and other US

cars.
>
> The idea was that you could use much larger inlet valves, with the

technology of
> the day, and get better power and economy.
>
> The pom's just keep on with it for longer, being bankrupt.
> cheers,
>
> Paul Saccani
> Perth West Australia


The 30s and 40s ford V8 sidevalves make nice hot rods tho, they sound
different (IMHO Better) than the V8's found these days.


 
Lon Stowell <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:eek:QRtb.168946$275.518820@attbi_s53...
> Approximately 11/15/03 13:58, Jim uttered for posterity:
>
> > There are perhaps 3 basic reasons for waveing at another 4wd
> > 1. You feel like it
> > 2. To let them know you're ok
> > 3. Insurance in case you've got a problem. You can always tell someone

who's
> > never been bush, when you wave they scowl as if to say "what the hell do

you
> > want?"
> >

> 4. Driver has big jugs.
>
> My governor can kick your governor's ass


Governors are for diesels :p

--
Pat
Brisbane, Australia
http://homepage.powerup.com.au/~mangey/
Who needs lockers when you got secondaries.

VH4000-> CL3500/4300-> GH2600-> S2A2300/3000->
GJ1600/2000->RR3500/3900 ->GQ4200


 
Back
Top