L
Lon Stowell
Guest
Dori Schmetterling wrote:
> Looked at the Bat site. Of the features I need, it seems Outlook Express
> can do much the same. The biggest issue seems to me to be security, and
> isn't that taken care of by regular Norton AV updates?
Not completely. The big issue with Outlook is that it uses
Internet Explorer to render. It is POSSIBLE [1] to plant
virus or worms in a computer using media imbeds and attachments
with the outlook client. It is also possible to grab the user's
address book from within outlook, so Norton, etc. can't stop
this.
[1] Most of this can be stopped by common sense, namely don't
allow Active X from anything but trusted sites, and never
directly open an attachment.
And although it is possible to hit a computer using mp3
files, don't know of any non-lab incidents.
> Looked at the Bat site. Of the features I need, it seems Outlook Express
> can do much the same. The biggest issue seems to me to be security, and
> isn't that taken care of by regular Norton AV updates?
Not completely. The big issue with Outlook is that it uses
Internet Explorer to render. It is POSSIBLE [1] to plant
virus or worms in a computer using media imbeds and attachments
with the outlook client. It is also possible to grab the user's
address book from within outlook, so Norton, etc. can't stop
this.
[1] Most of this can be stopped by common sense, namely don't
allow Active X from anything but trusted sites, and never
directly open an attachment.
And although it is possible to hit a computer using mp3
files, don't know of any non-lab incidents.