Freelander 1 Freelander EV

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Re cooling.

I dont know the IRD, But which runs cooler or does the IRD need heat?

Why not run IRD first then to the motor or viki versua on 1 line?

Just trying to simplify your plumbing woes :) .

J
 
Re cooling.

I dont know the IRD, But which runs cooler or does the IRD need heat?

Why not run IRD first then to the motor or viki versua on 1 line?

Just trying to simplify your plumbing woes :) .

J
The IRD is cooled in the factory setup. It runs pretty hot without cooling water, as its out of air flow passing underneath the vehicle, but it's taking all the torque from the gearbox.
With the EV conversion, it could potentially run even hotter, due to increased torque from the motor.

It's best to plumb it for cooling now, rather than try to plumb in later if it's subsequently found cooling is needed.
 
The IRD is cooled in the factory setup. It runs pretty hot without cooling water, as its out of air flow passing underneath the vehicle, but it's taking all the torque from the gearbox.
With the EV conversion, it could potentially run even hotter, due to increased torque from the motor.

It's best to plumb it for cooling now, rather than try to plumb in later if it's subsequently found cooling is needed.
You sort of misunderstood.
I didn't say don't cool it. Just trying to suggest a simpler cooling route.
Put the IRD first inline for cooling, or second in line.

Or run a 15/10mm line to the IRD and a 22mm to the motor natural restriction.

J
 
Flow will always favour a straight route over an elbow. So if you have the IRD cooler line coming off the main coolant line at 90°, then a majority of the coolant will flow straight past that joint. You could slightly restrict the straight line after the T, then you can divert more flow through the IRD if needed. It might take a bit of messing about to balance the flow initially.
Once the coolant has passed through the IRD and the motor/inverter/ DC-DC converter, then a Y piece will all both fluid streams to amalgamate evenly.

It's best to pump the coolant through the system, rather than suck it through on the return side.
I'm more concerned to make sure the coolant flow is good through the motor and inverter than the IRD as they are way more valuable and I have a spare IRD. With this in mind I think I'll change it so the straight path goes through the IRD (to ensure it gets good flow) but then put the Y connector immediately after the IRD. This way some coolant will go through the IRD but all coolant will go through the motor etc.
I have the coolant flow pushing away from the coolant bottle towards the IRD, so hopefully it will be OK. It is not flowing through the bottle in the same way it is with the heater bottle. This is because the Freelander bottle has one large outlet and a very small inlet and the Leaf bottle had a large inlet and outlet.
 
Last edited:
You sort of misunderstood.
I didn't say don't cool it. Just trying to suggest a simpler cooling route.
Put the IRD first inline for cooling, or second in line.

Or run a 15/10mm line to the IRD and a 22mm to the motor natural restriction.

J
Possibly.
I think Ali is concerned with the IRD cooler restricting the coolant flow to the rest of the system. The IRD cooler plate has 10mm OD pipes, but the motor and inverter have 19mm OD pipes. So the concern is that the IRD could cause a flow issue, causing the expensive motor or inverter to overheat. I think the plan is to ensure full flow to the expensive parts, but restricting flow to the IRD, as the cooler pipes obviously require less cooling through those tiny pipes.
For this to work there would need to be 2 flow rates in the system, a high rate through the motor/inverter, splitting after the lager connections, sharing the IRD and a parallel flow restriction on the return. At least that's how I would do it.
 
Possibly.
I think Ali is concerned with the IRD cooler restricting the coolant flow to the rest of the system. The IRD cooler plate has 10mm OD pipes, but the motor and inverter have 19mm OD pipes. So the concern is that the IRD could cause a flow issue, causing the expensive motor or inverter to overheat. I think the plan is to ensure full flow to the expensive parts, but restricting flow to the IRD, as the cooler pipes obviously require less cooling through those tiny pipes.
For this to work there would need to be 2 flow rates in the system, a high rate through the motor/inverter, splitting after the lager connections, sharing the IRD and a parallel flow restriction on the return. At least that's how I would do it.
2 flow rates in 1 system yep sorted by different sized pipes, isn’t it? Oh and I was guessing the size of pipework.

As I said I don’t know what temps either of these get to (or need) . But it’s simple plumbing dynamics.

J
 
2 flow rates in 1 system yep sorted by different sized pipes, isn’t it? Oh and I was guessing the size of pipework.

As I said I don’t know what temps either of these get to (or need) . But it’s simple plumbing dynamics.

J
Yes mate, and the pipe sizes are close enough but three different sizes not two.
Right or wrong this is what I've done:-

IMG_20230708_170547644.jpg


The pump is to the left of the photo pushing coolant to the right. The coolant flows straight through the T piece into the IRD and takes a 90deg turn towards the Y piece. It comes out of the IRD into the other side of the Y piece then on to the motor. I figure this gives the IRD the best chance of getting cooled while still ensuring full flow through the expensive electronics. I'll monitor the IRD temps once on the road.
The complication here is I'm reusing old pipework from both the Leaf and Freelander with three different sizes of pipe and fitting all connected together.
 
2 flow rates in 1 system yep sorted by different sized pipes, isn’t it? Oh and I was guessing the size of pipework.

As I said I don’t know what temps either of these get to (or need) . But it’s simple plumbing dynamics.

J
Agreed. Good guess. I'm going by experience on the IRD, but I'm guessing on the electronics gubbins sizes from watching videos on the subject.

There was a chap with a similar setup in the RX7, who cooked his inverter by using it without cooling for several weeks, so I don't think there's much need for extreme cooling. An EV is electrically pretty efficient, so not much energy will be wasted as heat, but I guess it's better to err on the side of caution, and install more cooling than is needed.
 
Yes mate, and the pipe sizes are close enough but three different sizes not two.
Right or wrong this is what I've done:-

View attachment 292469

The pump is to the left of the photo pushing coolant to the right. The coolant flows straight through the T piece into the IRD and takes a 90deg turn towards the Y piece. It comes out of the IRD into the other side of the Y piece then on to the motor. I figure this gives the IRD the best chance of getting cooled while still ensuring full flow through the expensive electronics. I'll monitor the IRD temps once on the road.
The complication here is I'm reusing old pipework from both the Leaf and Freelander with three different sizes of pipe and fitting all connected together.
Looks good to me Ali. I think its sensible to monitor the temps through the system once up and running, but as long as all components get coolant flowing, I'm pretty sure it'll be fine. Dave ran his RX7 without any cooling for some time, and it took a hot day to cook his inverter.
 
Agreed. Good guess. I'm going by experience on the IRD, but I'm guessing on the electronics gubbins sizes from watching videos on the subject.

There was a chap with a similar setup in the RX7, who cooked his inverter by using it without cooling for several weeks, so I don't think there's much need for extreme cooling. An EV is electrically pretty efficient, so not much energy will be wasted as heat, but I guess it's better to err on the side of caution, and install more cooling than is needed.
I was concerned I would end up with an air lock or have the coolant trying to flow in the wrong direction if the flows and pressures were wrong but hopefully with this simple setup as described it will be OK. I still think the IRD will need less cooling not more due to the exhaust and hot engine no longer being beside it but I still want to ensure it is cooled.
Now I've sorted this I can start installing the charger, Inverter and batteries. :)
Once I've routed the cabling for the pumps and vacuum sensor of course. :(
And cable tied everything so the steering arms don't wreck them. o_O
It never ends. :oops:
 
Agreed. Good guess. I'm going by experience on the IRD, but I'm guessing on the electronics gubbins sizes from watching videos on the subject.

There was a chap with a similar setup in the RX7, who cooked his inverter by using it without cooling for several weeks, so I don't think there's much need for extreme cooling. An EV is electrically pretty efficient, so not much energy will be wasted as heat, but I guess it's better to err on the side of caution, and install more cooling than is needed.

My RX7 had a variable speed water pump :)

J
 
Yes mate, and the pipe sizes are close enough but three different sizes not two.
Right or wrong this is what I've done:-

View attachment 292469

The pump is to the left of the photo pushing coolant to the right. The coolant flows straight through the T piece into the IRD and takes a 90deg turn towards the Y piece. It comes out of the IRD into the other side of the Y piece then on to the motor. I figure this gives the IRD the best chance of getting cooled while still ensuring full flow through the expensive electronics. I'll monitor the IRD temps once on the road.
The complication here is I'm reusing old pipework from both the Leaf and Freelander with three different sizes of pipe and fitting all connected together.

Can I ask.
bottom of the pic big pipe? Feed or return to the motor? Dont matter it has a restriction into the small pipe.

Or is it the same size it’s just the covering?

J
 
I quite like the RX7, except for the fuel consumption. Actually thinking about it, the EV converted one is an RX8, with the suicide rear doors.

I always had a soft spot for the rotary engine, has/had its downsides. Still do.
but it runs on hydrogen really well, just thought I would Chuck that in and no we are not gonna have a discussion about it in Ali’s EV fred:p.

J
 
I always had a soft spot for the rotary engine, has/had its downsides. Still do.
but it runs on hydrogen really well, just thought I would Chuck that in and no we are not gonna have a discussion about it in Ali’s EV fred:p.

J
No, Ali wouldn't want hydrogen comment on his EV thread.
 
My RX7 had a variable speed water pump :)

J
Both water pumps have variable speed and can be controlled by an Arduino. I set them to run at half speed which seems to be about right but could make them variable if I needed to.
Can I ask.
bottom of the pic big pipe? Feed or return to the motor? Dont matter it has a restriction into the small pipe.

Or is it the same size it’s just the covering?

J
It's the feed for the motor, you can follow it back to the Y piece I was talking about. I decided it was better to have the coolant flow to the bottom of the motor first, then fill the motor etc on the way up. My theory is it's less likely to air lock that way but happy to hear from any plumbers out there who might know better. 😋
The Leaf pipework is a good deal bigger than the Freelander so it's a pain trying to force Freelander hoses onto Leaf connectors but with a little washing up liquid I got there. I think a bit of flushing with clean water will be in order before putting in coolant. ;)
I always had a soft spot for the rotary engine, has/had its downsides. Still do.
but it runs on hydrogen really well, just thought I would Chuck that in and no we are not gonna have a discussion about it in Ali’s EV fred:p.

J
DON'T YOU DARE!!!!! :mad:
 
Don't forget that on both the TD4 & 1.8, the IRD cooling comes from the engine block, and returns via the heater core. In this case the engine will be getting cooler fluid than the IRD.

Personally the idea above of a Y-pipe after the pump, with different pipe sizes to split the flow accordingly is probably the best idea. There's good flow diagrams in RAVE for the IC engines, so plenty of info you could use there.
 
Don't forget that on both the TD4 & 1.8, the IRD cooling comes from the engine block, and returns via the heater core. In this case the engine will be getting cooler fluid than the IRD.

Personally the idea above of a Y-pipe after the pump, with different pipe sizes to split the flow accordingly is probably the best idea. There's good flow diagrams in RAVE for the IC engines, so plenty of info you could use there.
Thanks mate, I to me that the IRD may need heating as well as cooling but if so there's not much I can do about that.
In any case without having full flow through the IRD, which may restrict the flow for the electronics and motor this was the best I could do for it.
Damn! I just realised I may have missed a trick. :oops:
If the IRD tends to run hot I should have plumbed the heater core through it so the IRD can assist HV electric HV heater.

Any thoughts guys on whether the cabin heater matrix would be enough to cool the IRD?
 
Back
Top