electric range rover

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Karlos the jackal said:
so more batteries means more productivity so more mining for the lithium to put in the battery
next you will be putting steering in caravans so can be steered with out being towed
Click to expand...
BRILLIANT ,that's the kind of forward thinking that will make us rich ,....;) and if i put a wind power generator on the roof ,it would charge itself while going forward :rolleyes:...or 2 :D:D twice the power ,$$$$$$$$$$$ can see it now ..:D..
 
dubbleRR said:
BRILLIANT ,that's the kind of forward thinking that will make us rich ,....;) and if i put a wind power generator on the roof ,it would charge itself while going forward :rolleyes:...or 2 :D:D twice the power ,$$$$$$$$$$$ can see it now ..:D..
Click to expand...
we would have to use a air vent like they do on vans noting to big as would cause wind resistance and drag so the motor will work harder causing battery drain issues just like the RR :) :)
 
ah of course, hide the power station 'far away' and its pollution doesnt affect you :rolleyes:
and solar / wind power is clean, no emissions at all (at the time of generation) aside from the impact it has on the environment, but we dont talk about that because its far away or under water where you dont see it.
he's a rather 'pro electric' guy, isn't he! electric is mavellous.
 
kermit_rr said:
installing solar at your home 'pays from day one', i'm sorry, that just discredited anything else he just said
Click to expand...

He might be referring to the feed in tariffs. I looked at solar panels years ago and essentially I was paying up front for something that would take 12 years to break even on with an estimated life-span of 15 years (the ac converters tend to break down) although the panels might give good efficiency for up to 25 years if you got lucky.

I love the idea of renewables and breaking the dependency on oil but last I looked solar panels used as much CO2 from ground to panel as they save in CO2 in estimated life-span. Lithium batteries have similar issues. Wind seems to genuinely work with a net negative CO2 impact. Nuclear? Well, disposal is still the big elephant in the room. There's heaps of low-grade spent fuel around the world and it isn't going anywhere. Thorium reactors seem like they might bridge a gap but it might be too late to start now given the lead in times.

Hydrogen fuel cells seem a no-brainer but no-one wants to invest to get the niggles out of the way because they're too busy selling batteries.

For off-setting these people are doing good work. They just need the investment equivalent to a couple of beers a month: https://www.climeworks.com/subscriptions
 
Grrrrrr said:
no-one wants to invest to get the niggles out of the way because they're too busy selling batteries.
Click to expand...
thats the real problem right there.
people are only interested in what makes them rich and politicians see the net result, what comes out of the car, absolutely nothing, so they push that because its an easy vote winner
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Datatek
Exploding Range Rover EV
Replies
14
Views
841
Datatek
Datatek
Vogueman
L322 Road tax Proposed
Replies
16
Views
536
scoots
S
1988smithy
Chinese Hippo's
2
Replies
20
Views
1K
Andy Warren
Andy Warren
R
Mirrors
Replies
2
Views
292
roythebus
R
V
Japanese range rover
Replies
3
Views
537
pwood999
pwood999
Back
Top