www.car-maintenance.org

"Darren" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Joe Beeston wrote:
> > "Darren" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:<[email protected]>...
> >
> >>Hi, please accept my apologies if you aren't interested in this.
> >>
> >>We have a fairly new website aiming at being a complete online resource
for
> >>car maintenance in the UK.
> >>
> >>If you are interested in cars then at least it may be worth you having a
> >>look, if not then thanks for reading anyway.
> >>
> >>Darren www.car-maintenance.org Admin
> >
> >
> > Eat penguin ****e you ass pee honker
>
> Never tried it, what's it like?


while i have every sympathy for you and can see your acting out of the best
intentions...


Loosing battle. fighting a.

rearrange the above sentance mate ;o) your probably not going to get
anywhere with this.

Mason

Mason wrote:

>
>
>
> while i have every sympathy for you and can see your acting out of the best
> intentions...
>
>
> Loosing battle. fighting a.
>
> rearrange the above sentance mate ;o) your probably not going to get
> anywhere with this.
>
> Mason
>
>

Thanks. Good advice and taken.

"Darren" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Mason wrote:
>
> >
> >
> >
> > while i have every sympathy for you and can see your acting out of the
best
> > intentions...
> >
> >
> > Loosing battle. fighting a.
> >
> > rearrange the above sentance mate ;o) your probably not going to get
> > anywhere with this.
> >
> > Mason
> >
> >
>
> Thanks. Good advice and taken.


*Claps*

no hard feelings and all that....

Tone ([email protected]) gurgled happily, sounding much like they were
saying :

> On a group such as what ? Your spamming this crap everywhere

That's "you're", please...

> So dont bother
> "What a long, strange trip its been">

Do you have an allergy to apostrophes?

Darren ([email protected]) gurgled happily, sounding much like
they were saying :

> I still don't expect language like that on usenet on a group such as
> this.

Tough ****.

Cope with it or **** off. Your call.

Chet wrote:


>
>
> Ooh i'm glad you had a good look around then!
>

i must admit, i only had a little look around. when i have more time and
a renault again i may have more of a look. but i'm certainly not upset
with you for bringing to my attention.

>
> I would but its so hard to click 'next' a couple of times with the trushkin
> theme
>

phpbb 2.2 should fix those problems when its released.

>
>
> By 'sites' i assume you mean site?
>

doh! you caught me out. i didnt actually click all of the links. perhaps
thats why people are getting upset, they think that they have to click
every link in a post otherwise the message turns into a virus?

The message <[email protected]>
from Darren <[email protected]> contains these words:

> > Eat penguin ****e you ass pee honker

> Never tried it, what's it like?

And what's "****e"? Is it the shine you get with T-cut?

--
Skipweasel.
Being superstitious brings bad luck

In article <[email protected]>, Darren
<[email protected]> writes
>I don't consider my original post to be spam, in what way is it not to
>do with the subject matter of all of the groups I posted it to?

Regardless of the arguments about what Your original posting, please
stop feeding the troll(s).

Please.
--
Malcolm Ball
replace ignore with newsB for valid reply
this lasts for 3 spams max.

SteveH wrote:

>
> Here, have a shift key ****wit.

i gave up on it, i thought if all the sensible posting was going out the
window then so should my capitals!

"Darren" wrote
> A militant usenetter would have been someone who upheld the basic
> fundamentals of usenet, not jumped on someone for posting a link to their
> own non-commercial site, dealing with the same subject matter of the
> newsgroup in question, which by all definitions of spam posted anywhere on
> the internet apart from, it seems, uk.rec groups isnt spam.

Yeah, but whether it is spam or not do you still think it was a good idea?

Douglas

"Guy King" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> The message <[email protected]>
> from Darren <[email protected]> contains these words:
>
> > > Eat penguin ****e you ass pee honker
>
> > Never tried it, what's it like?
>
> And what's "****e"? Is it the shine you get with T-cut?
>
> --
> Skipweasel.
> Being superstitious brings bad luck
>
>

This is great, if the original spam had been ignored, it would have gone
away, instead, this turns into approx 100 posts, and he gets more attention
for his spam than anyone could have imagined......now, I never post to
usenet, just an avid reader, I am always lurking.......but i felt I had to
post to this one to bring this point to everyones attention.

I think the troll has been fed.

SteveH wrote:

>
> He wouldn't know. His posting history amounts to a handful of posts 18
> months ago, plus this spam.

again, that hasnt always been my email address. how are things at number 12?

Darren <[email protected]> wrote:

> SteveH wrote:
>
> >
> > He wouldn't know. His posting history amounts to a handful of posts 18
> > months ago, plus this spam.
>
> again, that hasnt always been my email address. how are things at number 12?

Oh look, you can look up my address from my domain name. How clever.

Am I supposed to be scared or impressed?

Shame it's 5 years out of date.

I was miles ahead of you in this respect, but I know where to draw the
line when digging up personal info. on people, and wouldn't even dream
of posting stuff like that on usenet.
--
Steve H 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
http://www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - MZ ETZ300
VW Golf GL Cabrio - Alfa 75 TS - Alfa 155 TS Lusso - COSOC KOTL
BoTAFOT #87 - BoTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #

Darren wrote:
> Chet wrote:
>
>
>>
>>
>> Ooh i'm glad you had a good look around then!
>>
>
> i must admit, i only had a little look around. when i have more time
> and
> a renault again i may have more of a look. but i'm certainly not upset
> with you for bringing to my attention.
>

Fair few mods in there, biggest pain in the arse was the attachment mod. I
was lookin around yours and seen PaulRoBo (or whatever) is there with a cav,
i knew him when he had a clio with a gtt lump in LOL

>>
>> I would but its so hard to click 'next' a couple of times with the
>> trushkin theme
>>
>
> phpbb 2.2 should fix those problems when its released.
>

Hey i'm only just gone to 2.0.10

>>
>>
>> By 'sites' i assume you mean site?
>>
>
> doh! you caught me out. i didnt actually click all of the links.
> perhaps thats why people are getting upset, they think that they have
> to click
> every link in a post otherwise the message turns into a virus?

Nahahaa

--
Chet
http://www.retro-renault.com
1991 HF Integrale 16v - Gettin there!
1993 Renault 19 16v - Subtle extras like a T3
1998 Audi A4 - I don't know why, but i did.

Douglas Payne wrote:

>
> Yeah, but whether it is spam or not do you still think it was a good idea?
>
> Douglas
>
>

I concede that now I don't believe it was a good idea. I misjudged the
level of trolling.

Darren <[email protected]> wrote:

> Douglas Payne wrote:
>
> >
> > Yeah, but whether it is spam or not do you still think it was a good idea?
> >
> > Douglas
> >
> >
>
> I concede that now I don't believe it was a good idea. I misjudged the
> level of trolling.

Which can be easily translated:

'I didn't read any of the groups I cross posted my spam to'
--
Steve H 'You're not a real petrolhead unless you've owned an Alfa Romeo'
http://www.italiancar.co.uk - Honda VFR800 - MZ ETZ300
VW Golf GL Cabrio - Alfa 75 TS - Alfa 155 TS Lusso - COSOC KOTL
BoTAFOT #87 - BoTAFOF #18 - MRO # - UKRMSBC #7 - Apostle #2 - YTC #

SteveH wrote:

>
> Oh look, you can look up my address from my domain name. How clever.
>

its not particularly difficult to find my email address from the domain
and search google groups for previous posts is it? you also have 'a'
address from that which you would have had to do before even searching
google groups.

> Am I supposed to be scared or impressed?

neither.

>
> I was miles ahead of you in this respect,

whoopee doo.

but I know where to draw the
> line when digging up personal info. on people, and wouldn't even dream
> of posting stuff like that on usenet.

you did it first. sorry i posted your house number. everyone on usenet
is now going to go round to every number 12 in the country to find you.

Chet wrote:


> Fair few mods in there, biggest pain in the arse was the attachment mod.

sorry didnt log-in to see them. didnt find the attachment mod that
difficult myself but as everything is written for subsilver theres no
messing with the tpl's

> I
> was lookin around yours and seen PaulRoBo (or whatever) is there with a cav,
> i knew him when he had a clio with a gtt lump in LOL
>

At least he's gone on to better things

"Darren" wrote
>
>>
>> Yeah, but whether it is spam or not do you still think it was a good
>> idea?
>
> I concede that now I don't believe it was a good idea.

That's good enough for me. Hopefully I shall have no cause to say anything
more on the matter.

> I misjudged the level of trolling.

Trolling. Hmm, I believe that is a subjective term, without a proper
definition...

Douglas

SteveH wrote:

>>Darren <[email protected]> wrote:

>>I concede that now I don't believe it was a good idea. I misjudged the
>>level of trolling.
>
>
> Which can be easily translated:
>
> 'I didn't read any of the groups I cross posted my spam to'

I thought that was already known?