bankz5152
Well-Known Member
- Posts
- 9,311
- Location
- South London/North Kent
Been learning all about wheel bearings, adjustment etc.. after one of mine failed due to being too tight.
So as far as I understand it the older system LR used was Endfloat, the two lock nuts and washer method which made for pretty simple adjusting either via torque values or feel. Then the later 'idiot proof' method of Preload using a steel collar/spacer and a stake nut, done up bastard tight with various spacers to adjust.
Mine had both methods done, preload on the rears and endfloat on the fronts. I was wondering if it would be sensible to use the endfloat method to get the bearings adjusted but still using the the collar/spacer which in my mind prevents the bearings from getting too tight?
Also as to why LR changed it, seems like the old method is better and preferred by most. The new method doesnt look like it saves any money on the manufacturing side so why the change?
Also am I correct in thinking the Pumas do not have changeable wheel bearings and the whole hub as to be swapped?
So as far as I understand it the older system LR used was Endfloat, the two lock nuts and washer method which made for pretty simple adjusting either via torque values or feel. Then the later 'idiot proof' method of Preload using a steel collar/spacer and a stake nut, done up bastard tight with various spacers to adjust.
Mine had both methods done, preload on the rears and endfloat on the fronts. I was wondering if it would be sensible to use the endfloat method to get the bearings adjusted but still using the the collar/spacer which in my mind prevents the bearings from getting too tight?
Also as to why LR changed it, seems like the old method is better and preferred by most. The new method doesnt look like it saves any money on the manufacturing side so why the change?
Also am I correct in thinking the Pumas do not have changeable wheel bearings and the whole hub as to be swapped?