eightinavee
Well-Known Member
- Posts
- 3,956
- Location
- UK.
And have you ever tried to feed a Chev mouse motor - let alone a rat ?I'm not trying to ram german cars down anyones neck, i suggested a chevy v8 rather than a rover.
And have you ever tried to feed a Chev mouse motor - let alone a rat ?I'm not trying to ram german cars down anyones neck, i suggested a chevy v8 rather than a rover.
I'm not trying to ram german cars down anyones neck, i suggested a chevy v8 rather than a rover.
Ford - YUK.
Yup, that is right, and Torque and BHP are numerically equal at 5250 revs.hey - take 5 - that implies that bhp goes up as revs increase, providing the torque remains constant, but it dont - torque normally peaks at low rpm (relatively) but bhp keeps climbing to somewhere near max revs.
i dinna ken yo formula
Do chevy make a 3.5ltr V8 I thought they started around the 4.2ltr mark
not really a fair comparison is it.
Yup, that is right, and Torque and BHP are numerically equal at 5250 revs.
bollix!
Just look at the attached graphs - there is no way that Torque and BHP are numerically equal at 5250 RPM.
As I stated before, Torque tends to peak low down the rev range and then taper off - the BHP peaks a lot higher.
will yer stop sproutin utter ****, when yer finally grow up and start work you'll look back at yer time on LZ and cringe.I'm thinking the Chevy V8 will be a better engine to put in than the rover. Didn't Overfinch use Chevy engines in the RR?
was it too much HP or too much tork wot done this?
I dunno, you spend 4 years of yer life studying Engineering, then no-one believes you when you sprout **** about basic engineering concepts
Ah well...
Welcome To LandyZone, the Land Rover Forums!
Here at LandyZone we have plenty of very knowledgable members so if you have any questions about your Land Rover or just want to connect with other Landy owners, you're in the right place.
Registering is free and easy just click here, we hope to see you on the forums soon!