- Posts
- 14,902
- Location
- Doncaster
They're at it again ... sent to me via email.
PLEASE RE-POST:
The Peak District National Park is seeking a permanent TRO on Chapel Gate and inviting objections. Chapel Gate is currently the best drivable route in the Peak District. We need to muster as many objections as possible. On previous consultations for the Roych and Long Causeway we managed over 4000 objections.
We are aiming to have over 6000 objections for Chapel Gate.
Please circulate and forward this to as many clubs, forums and users as possible all across the UK, with a request to ensure objections are submitted either :
through the link: http://consult.peakdistrict.gov.uk/details.cfm?TROID=6
or by email to chapelgate@peakdistrict.gov.uk
or by post.
The BEFORE 28th June 2013 qualification applies to all methods of responding.
The link above will give all the information needed from the Peak Parks website. The objections do not need to be long or technical but your objection will carry more weight if you give good reasons. Asking questions of the National Park in your objection is a good tactic to increase their workload. To help, there are several points below, which you may wish to incorporate into any objection:
· The Peak District National Park Authority (PDNPA) is acting in a discriminatory fashion by singling out recreational vehicle users in this way.
· The PDNPA is openly prejudiced and biased against vehicle users, with Members of the Authority taking public positions and being members of pressure groups opposed to recreational drivers and riders.
· The recommendations of the Local Access Forum (LAF), which is a legal body formed to advise the PDNPA on matters around Rights of Way, was ignored in proposing this Permanent TRO. The LAF had recommended a limited TRO.
· The Rights of Way Officers conducted a flawed survey as part of an unlawful Experimental TRO, yet they still used its biased and discriminatory findings to seek the approval of the PDNPA to proceed to a Permanent TRO.
· Much of the Authoritys concern is for the ecology of the area, which is a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) but they will not concede that the area is also Open Access and therefore subject to walkers leaving the route to wander freely across the landscape.
· The Authority claims to be concerned about damage to the lane and other users being forced from the route by vehicles or the expectation of meeting vehicles and so creating parallel tracks. However, they are not concerned when walkers, cyclists and horse riders damage bridleways and create parallel tracks on other routes. In this way the PDNPA operates double standards.
· The PDNPA is utterly unconcerned that they are removing a legal right to use Chapel Gate for a small minority of users. The Authority is happy to suggest that vehicle users can use the surfaced road network as an alternative but refuses to suggest that walkers, cyclists and horse riders could use alternative footpaths and bridleways to avoid the Chapel Gate BOAT.
PLEASE object however briefly, and please ensure that you submit the objection BEFORE 28 June. Your effort will count.
Nigel Bennett
Peak and Derbyshire Vehicle User Group (PDVUG)
PLEASE RE-POST:
The Peak District National Park is seeking a permanent TRO on Chapel Gate and inviting objections. Chapel Gate is currently the best drivable route in the Peak District. We need to muster as many objections as possible. On previous consultations for the Roych and Long Causeway we managed over 4000 objections.
We are aiming to have over 6000 objections for Chapel Gate.
Please circulate and forward this to as many clubs, forums and users as possible all across the UK, with a request to ensure objections are submitted either :
through the link: http://consult.peakdistrict.gov.uk/details.cfm?TROID=6
or by email to chapelgate@peakdistrict.gov.uk
or by post.
The BEFORE 28th June 2013 qualification applies to all methods of responding.
The link above will give all the information needed from the Peak Parks website. The objections do not need to be long or technical but your objection will carry more weight if you give good reasons. Asking questions of the National Park in your objection is a good tactic to increase their workload. To help, there are several points below, which you may wish to incorporate into any objection:
· The Peak District National Park Authority (PDNPA) is acting in a discriminatory fashion by singling out recreational vehicle users in this way.
· The PDNPA is openly prejudiced and biased against vehicle users, with Members of the Authority taking public positions and being members of pressure groups opposed to recreational drivers and riders.
· The recommendations of the Local Access Forum (LAF), which is a legal body formed to advise the PDNPA on matters around Rights of Way, was ignored in proposing this Permanent TRO. The LAF had recommended a limited TRO.
· The Rights of Way Officers conducted a flawed survey as part of an unlawful Experimental TRO, yet they still used its biased and discriminatory findings to seek the approval of the PDNPA to proceed to a Permanent TRO.
· Much of the Authoritys concern is for the ecology of the area, which is a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI) but they will not concede that the area is also Open Access and therefore subject to walkers leaving the route to wander freely across the landscape.
· The Authority claims to be concerned about damage to the lane and other users being forced from the route by vehicles or the expectation of meeting vehicles and so creating parallel tracks. However, they are not concerned when walkers, cyclists and horse riders damage bridleways and create parallel tracks on other routes. In this way the PDNPA operates double standards.
· The PDNPA is utterly unconcerned that they are removing a legal right to use Chapel Gate for a small minority of users. The Authority is happy to suggest that vehicle users can use the surfaced road network as an alternative but refuses to suggest that walkers, cyclists and horse riders could use alternative footpaths and bridleways to avoid the Chapel Gate BOAT.
PLEASE object however briefly, and please ensure that you submit the objection BEFORE 28 June. Your effort will count.
Nigel Bennett
Peak and Derbyshire Vehicle User Group (PDVUG)
