tottot
Well-Known Member
- Posts
- 8,028
- Location
- west wales coast
Perhaps an email to GME springs is in order.
Hi All
Tottot is correct - I have given this a lot of thought - but necessarily so in my view. Things are clearly amiss at present. I cranked up a decent push down on the front of the chassis last night and can confirm that no amount of loading is going to correct the mismatch such that the standard prop will fit without it being stretched out to the max.
David - I have a standard 2.25 engine and box.
Nick - Yes the locator dowel sits nicely in the middle of the U bolt plate hole on both sides.
By my measurements and by comparison with a set of standard springs, the dowel in the centre of the GME springs is too far forward by about 20-25 mm. The springs I have are symmetrical so cannot be mounted 'wrong way around'. My proposed solution was to simply redrill the hole in the bottom spring plate (the one the U bolts go through). This having the effect of sliding the axle backwards along the spring, so it is in more or less the correct position. I agree that drilling the springs themselves is not a good idea at all.
I agree that having the axle a little forward of the bumpstops is not a bad thing when the vehicle is static and lightly loaded - the axle will tend to move back a touch as the springs flatten out under load. However, by measurement, even if the spring is flattened right out, the locating dowel (and hence the axle in its current setup) is still well forward of the bumpstop position. This (in my mind anyhow) has to be incorrect. After all, 35 mm is half the length of the bumpstop. I could see 10 or even 15 mm offset being beneficial, but not the amount I have.
I also agree that having a propshaft that is not in (roughly) the middle of its slip length when the vehicle is static will eventually end in disaster. Hit a bump and you will push hard on the transfer case, go over a hole and the prop will fall apart.
So - the question is - is the dowel position in my springs incorrect? I have measured the chassis against another truck and the key dimensions are identical so I don't believe my chassis has been modified.
If the dowel is wrong, is there fundamentally a problem with redrilling the U bolt plate to slide the axle backwards a bit?
I have asked Paddocks for their opinion on the springs. Not heard anything yet and am not overly hopeful of inspiration from this quarter. I may be wrong though.
I'm reluctant to chase down a longer prop if my suggested modification will work.
Thanks all for your input thus far.
No Kiwi.....not talking about the in the U bolt mounting plate hole....you cant see this one when the axle is sat on the spring.Hi All
Tottot is correct - I have given this a lot of thought - but necessarily so in my view. Things are clearly amiss at present. I cranked up a decent push down on the front of the chassis last night and can confirm that no amount of loading is going to correct the mismatch such that the standard prop will fit without it being stretched out to the max.
David - I have a standard 2.25 engine and box.
Nick - Yes the locator dowel sits nicely in the middle of the U bolt plate hole on both sides.
By my measurements and by comparison with a set of standard springs, the dowel in the centre of the GME springs is too far forward by about 20-25 mm. The springs I have are symmetrical so cannot be mounted 'wrong way around'. My proposed solution was to simply redrill the hole in the bottom spring plate (the one the U bolts go through). This having the effect of sliding the axle backwards along the spring, so it is in more or less the correct position. I agree that drilling the springs themselves is not a good idea at all.
I agree that having the axle a little forward of the bumpstops is not a bad thing when the vehicle is static and lightly loaded - the axle will tend to move back a touch as the springs flatten out under load. However, by measurement, even if the spring is flattened right out, the locating dowel (and hence the axle in its current setup) is still well forward of the bumpstop position. This (in my mind anyhow) has to be incorrect. After all, 35 mm is half the length of the bumpstop. I could see 10 or even 15 mm offset being beneficial, but not the amount I have.
I also agree that having a propshaft that is not in (roughly) the middle of its slip length when the vehicle is static will eventually end in disaster. Hit a bump and you will push hard on the transfer case, go over a hole and the prop will fall apart.
So - the question is - is the dowel position in my springs incorrect? I have measured the chassis against another truck and the key dimensions are identical so I don't believe my chassis has been modified.
If the dowel is wrong, is there fundamentally a problem with redrilling the U bolt plate to slide the axle backwards a bit?
I have asked Paddocks for their opinion on the springs. Not heard anything yet and am not overly hopeful of inspiration from this quarter. I may be wrong though.
I'm reluctant to chase down a longer prop if my suggested modification will work.
Thanks all for your input thus far.
Welcome To LandyZone, the Land Rover Forums!
Here at LandyZone we have plenty of very knowledgable members so if you have any questions about your Land Rover or just want to connect with other Landy owners, you're in the right place.
Registering is free and easy just click here, we hope to see you on the forums soon!