nanocom unit

tomcat59alan · Jan 21, 2015

Ianwallace said:
Ok I see.
Ow well. I wonder what I can bugger up now [emoji53]

You can see I'm bored now as I've just learned how to put a photo on hear

DON'T WHAT EVER YOU DO, bugger the kettle up. Most important piece of garage equipment.

Ianwallace · Jan 21, 2015

Well you say that!!!!!!!! [emoji12][emoji477]️

Datatek · Jan 21, 2015

Ianwallace said:
Ok EAS fault.
Why won't this clear as it was working before
Here are the setting I have
View attachment 67925
View attachment 67926
View attachment 67927
View attachment 67928

Are these correct?

The readings appear to all be the same for all height settings, so it is not moving to the different heights. I do not know how you command the different heights from a Nanocom as I use the EAS software.
You should be able to command the car to go to the different heights from the Nanocom, you may need the engine running to do this, then the current readings should approximate to the stored values for each height.

Ianwallace · Jan 21, 2015

I may have had a fiddle

wammers · Jan 21, 2015

Ianwallace said:
I may have had a fiddle

Ok send to high setting on dash then go to high setting on Nano. Press live and readings should approximate stored. Do the same for all other settings. To go to motorway height press EAS lock button then you can select motorway. Check what is stored against each heights live figure.

Datatek · Jan 21, 2015

wammers said:
Ok send to high setting on dash then go to high setting on Nano. Press live and readings should approximate stored. Do the same for all other settings. To go to motorway height press EAS lock button then you can select motorway. Check what is stored against each heights live figure.

Can you not send the EAS to the different heights from the Nanocom? You can from the RSW EAS software

wammers · Jan 21, 2015

Datatek said:
Can you not send the EAS to the different heights from the Nanocom? You can from the RSW EAS software

Yes but it means changing screens so easier to use dash height selector in that mode.

Ianwallace · Jan 21, 2015

Datatek said:
The readings appear to all be the same for all height settings, so it is not moving to the different heights. I do not know how you command the different heights from a Nanocom as I use the EAS software.
You should be able to command the car to go to the different heights from the Nanocom, you may need the engine running to do this, then the current readings should approximate to the stored values for each height.

the car does move up and down
the way I understand this is that the values are the target values.

all I have done is the following for example

front right =105
front left = 110

so all I have done is set both front left and front right to the same value
as the way I see it the car would sit uneven?:monitor_punch:

tomcat59alan · Jan 21, 2015

Ianwallace said:
the car does move up and down
the way I understand this is that the values are the target values.

all I have done is the following for example

front right =105
front left = 110

so all I have done is set both front left and front right to the same value
as the way I see it the car would sit uneven?:monitor_punch:

Not necessarily

Datatek · Jan 21, 2015

Ianwallace said:
the car does move up and down
the way I understand this is that the values are the target values.

all I have done is the following for example

front right =105
front left = 110

so all I have done is set both front left and front right to the same value
as the way I see it the car would sit uneven?:monitor_punch:

Wrong. The sensors are not very precise, within limits, the actual number does not matter, what matters is the measured height from the wheel centre to the wheel arch, the numbers are adjusted to achieve the correct height.
A difference of 5 side to side is not unusual when the measured height is correct.

wammers · Jan 21, 2015

Ianwallace said:
the car does move up and down
the way I understand this is that the values are the target values.

all I have done is the following for example

front right =105
front left = 110

so all I have done is set both front left and front right to the same value
as the way I see it the car would sit uneven?:monitor_punch:

Does not work that way, make sure you write down ANYTHING you change BEFORE you change it or you are in for a world of pain.

Ianwallace · Jan 21, 2015

Ow [emoji20]
Yet again I bow down to the masters
So do I just leave them now? Or try and find out the correct settings

Me thinks I should stick to making the tea

wammers · Jan 21, 2015

Ianwallace said:
Ow [emoji20]
Yet again I bow down to the masters
So do I just leave them now? Or try and find out the correct settings

Me thinks I should stick to making the tea

Two sugars for me thanks.

Ianwallace · Jan 21, 2015

I think this is all I'm good for [emoji27]

wammers · Jan 21, 2015

Ianwallace said:
I think this is all I'm good for [emoji27]

I do think it was mentioned earlier that you should not play with it until you knew what it did. Checking for faults and listing what you could not clear, then asking about them is one thing. Changing settings when you do not know the consequence of the change is quite another.

Ianwallace · Jan 21, 2015

I'm sorry I'm a bad friend [emoji27]
It was just there and the unit talked to me. (Change me) it said. I couldn't resist arrrrrr. [emoji16]

wammers · Jan 21, 2015

Ianwallace said:
I'm sorry I'm a bad friend [emoji27]
It was just there and the unit talked to me. (Change me) it said. I couldn't resist arrrrrr. [emoji16]

And if it said don't go to the lap dance club tonight go to a gay bar, you would do that. Or of course the other way round as i do not know which direction you lean to.

Ianwallace · Jan 21, 2015

[emoji24][emoji24][emoji24][emoji24][emoji24][emoji24][emoji24]

dashwoodlandy · Jan 21, 2015

Ianwallace said:
I'm sorry I'm a bad friend [emoji27]
It was just there and the unit talked to me. (Change me) it said. I couldn't resist arrrrrr. [emoji16]

:hysterically_laughi:hysterically_laughi

tomcat59alan · Jan 21, 2015

wammers said:
I do think it was mentioned earlier that you should not play with it until you knew what it did. Checking for faults and listing what you could not clear, then asking about them is one thing. Changing settings when you do not know the consequence of the change is quite another.

But he's a proper man Tony, never read the manual.

nanocom unit

Well-Known Member

Active Member

Well-Known Member

Active Member

No longer with us, RIP

Well-Known Member

No longer with us, RIP

Active Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

No longer with us, RIP

Active Member

No longer with us, RIP

Active Member

No longer with us, RIP

Active Member

No longer with us, RIP

Active Member

Member

Well-Known Member

Similar threads