Yes, I know - it's a big heavy beast of a machine.
I was watching one of Andrew St Pierre White's 4xOverland YouTube videos - he's probably marmite, but I like that he expresses an informed opinion whether you like it or not. He liked the Disco 1 (although it was too small for him), panned the original Disco 2 (technology for technology's sake with the deletion of the locking centre diff and its substitution of TC and HDC), and seems genuinely impressed by the Disco 4.
Two problems he highlighted: low-profile tyres that destroy their sidewalls (especially if you lower inflation pressures for traction) and that it becomes very expensive to maintain if you use it extensively off road... All of which I find quite interesting.
Most of the Disco 3's/ 4's I've seen up for sale generally have significant mileages (170+k miles is not unusual) - so they're good for general car use, but is a criticism for becoming seriously expensive to maintain if used off road deserved?
another reason i’ve always disliked low profiles on 4x4s, as u take away the capability when the tyres are destroyed and rims damaged
alas i think it’s like anything , harder u use a vehicle the more it reqs maintenance, inc how much on and off road use, inc if u start putting it through thick mud or water
Last edited: