Classic Misfiring at 2-3000rpm

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.
If you've definitely ruled out all the electrical possibilities then next it has to be valves.... :(

Measure twice, cut once. MAKE SURE the coils, leads & plugs are perfect, and if distributor, electronic or points are fine, check capacitor and anything else that may cause this electrically.

Failing that, I would be checking the camshaft, valves, exhaust manifold (for blockage) and any O2 sensors which may have have a bearing on the firing & burning of fuel.

camshaft, valves were all done 500 miles ago, exhaust manifold blockage definitively not... i cant see how anything could have blocked it. it ran absolutely spot on one day, the next not.

it starts on the button idles happily, its only when it gets above 2,000 rpm it starts misfiring.
 
Pete1987RRC and Bike Teacher Dave may take the crown here..

My 87 efi had a similar issue which was solved by an ecu swap

Courtesy of Bike Teacher Dave .. he sent me this link http://www.carelect.demon.co.uk/rr396.html

RANGE ROVER/DISCOVERY WITH 3.5/3.9 LITRE ENGINE
(CAT & NON CAT) and HOT WIRE AIRMASS SYSTEM (from 1990)
- Possible ECU/airmass meter failure symptoms


The Lucas 14CU 'hot wire' airmass system ECU has proved to be more reliable than the earlier 'moving flap' airflow system 4CU ECU. Please click here for ECU photo. A common ECU problem we see is loss of 1 (or both) injector banks (usually following work in engine compartment) This failure is relatively easy to diagnose (check for injector pulses).

Early 3.9 ECU type number PRC7081 (superceded by PRC9061) develops a misfire at 2,800rpm (most noticeable at motorway speeds when overtaking). We now have a fix for this.

14CU ECUs as a group can suffer from intermittent running problems - such as running rich or cutting out for short periods - which are very difficult to diagnose so when there are vehicle problems we STRONGLY recommend road testing with a substitute before condemning your ECU.

Air mass meters are also causing running problems as vehicles age. Again, because diagnosis is so difficult, we STRONGLY recommend road testing road with a substitute before condemning air mass meter.​
 
Last edited:
I wasn't suggesting your's had sucked in the filter.. I think you'd have noticed :eek:

So it's electrics or airflow then. Gotta be one or the other. The only experience I have of dodgy ECU's are if they got wet or fried.

Looks like you're onto a winner though :)
 
yes that's what BTD and I arrived at.. electrics or airflow..

i got a new sh*tpart MAF through today.. put it on and it ran like a box of hammers.. wouldn't even idle which it does with the OEM Lucas MAF.

So that determines two things.

1. Sh*tpart QC is poor and they don't manufacture decent MAF's
2. If the sh*tpart MAF makes it run badly, then that would determine that the OEM MAF is good (or better) which then leads to electrics.

spark is good and strong timing is spot bollock on, we can remove ignition from the equation.. which then i suspect leads to the Fuel ECU.. or the OEM Maf has failed in the range where it meters more air...

i have the ECU refurber and a MAF refurber... i guess i'll be on the phone tomorrow. whats the betting that both say it'll be the part they refurb :rolleyes:

hmmmmmmmmm
 
yes that's what BTD and I arrived at.. electrics or airflow..

i got a new sh*tpart MAF through today.. put it on and it ran like a box of hammers.. wouldn't even idle which it does with the OEM Lucas MAF.

So that determines two things.

1. Sh*tpart QC is poor and they don't manufacture decent MAF's
2. If the sh*tpart MAF makes it run badly, then that would determine that the OEM MAF is good (or better) which then leads to electrics.

spark is good and strong timing is spot bollock on, we can remove ignition from the equation.. which then i suspect leads to the Fuel ECU.. or the OEM Maf has failed in the range where it meters more air...

i have the ECU refurber and a MAF refurber... i guess i'll be on the phone tomorrow. whats the betting that both say it'll be the part they refurb :rolleyes:

hmmmmmmmmm

So if it is over fueling, it's either metering or air flow restricted. If you have ruled out all else, then what's left has to be the cause. I hope you get to the bottom of it, it's been a head scratcher, but I wasn't out of the ball park so I'm pleased with meself :D
 
BTD, Pete, Doo.. going to have to take the crown back..

Took the seat out swapped over the fuel ECU.. no change.

Tried both ECUs with the OEM MAF and the Sh*tpart with consistent results. Sh*itpart MAF runs terribly on both OEM MAF and a Spare OEM MAF runs the same with both fuel ECUs.

I spoke to the company that overhauls the MAF and was advised that the fuel ECU needs a good signal from the lambda sensors. There us no failsafe on these so a bad O2 sensor will fail open with a rich mixture.. unplugging will make no difference to diagnosis.

Which leads back to my previous thought that the O2 sensors are fouled.
 
BTD, Pete, Doo.. going to have to take the crown back..

Took the seat out swapped over the fuel ECU.. no change.

Tried both ECUs with the OEM MAF and the Sh*tpart with consistent results. Sh*itpart MAF runs terribly on both OEM MAF and a Spare OEM MAF runs the same with both fuel ECUs.

I spoke to the company that overhauls the MAF and was advised that the fuel ECU needs a good signal from the lambda sensors. There us no failsafe on these so a bad O2 sensor will fail open with a rich mixture.. unplugging will make no difference to diagnosis.

Which leads back to my previous thought that the O2 sensors are fouled.

Did not I suggest that back a bit? That would be a big def in the rich running saga, but I understood you had ruled that out...

*places crown back on head* :D
 
so.. ordered up 2 new O2 sensors and a full set of temp sensors (3) to keep BTD happy :D

the only pain is the driver side O2 is a bitch to get to as its up on top of the gearbox
 
When I bought George, I replaced pretty much everything! After all, she sat on her arse for 5 years! I've been sat on mine 3 months and I need new legs, feet, arse, willy, ribs....:D
 
Anyway, the point of my post there was to say,, I removed the pipework so we could get the sensors out and it was a mare! Heat, lots of heat and re-threading. Saved time in the end...
 
I did the sensors when the engine came apart . That's the thing it's been running spit on since then had a misfire one evening and it's been misfiring since.
 
I plumped for gen yoo ine spensive Botchy ones. Did you go for genuine? It's entirely possible a wire was damaged or the sensor itself o_O
 
No wires damaged.. you have seen my engine bay ?
 

Attachments

  • DSC_0956b_zpsvtj0clrb.jpg
    DSC_0956b_zpsvtj0clrb.jpg
    137.1 KB · Views: 189
Clean! :eek:

Twin batteries too ;)

Anyway, it's easy done.... Damage to a wire.

However, it could be the sensors themselves, it happens o_O
 
indeed. well.. i've replaced dizzy cap, HT leads, plugs, rotor arm, fuel pump.. swapped out MAF's and ECU's with no change. new O2 sensors are on the way and to be honest the Bearmach temp sensors are like £4 each give or take, so £12 for the 3 is worthwhile just to rule them out. i have a feeling the O2 sensors may be the issue. purely because one is a right ***ker to reach. so.. being a Range Rover.. of course its going to be that
 
indeed. well.. i've replaced dizzy cap, HT leads, plugs, rotor arm, fuel pump.. swapped out MAF's and ECU's with no change. new O2 sensors are on the way and to be honest the Bearmach temp sensors are like £4 each give or take, so £12 for the 3 is worthwhile just to rule them out. i have a feeling the O2 sensors may be the issue. purely because one is a right ***ker to reach. so.. being a Range Rover.. of course its going to be that

Par for the course mate! I laugh when I hear people say, "It's always the last one you try...!"

WELL, THAT'S BECAUSE YOU FOUND THE FECKIN FAULT! :D Course you wouldn't go any further :p
 
Back
Top