Anyone who thinks that publicising Lane information is a good idea has obviously had a brain transplant! :crazy: Do you honestly think that joe bloggs who goes out and buys his £500 zuki is going to give a flying fook about maintaining the few ROW we have left? The thought process for these kind of people is to buy a 4x4 and go and find some mud. They dont care about the fragile state of lanes or that the council will close them down if they become over used. In fact thats the exact thing they want, they want mud, and water and they want a challenge.
If you speak to treadlightly and to ROW officers there are people going as far as blocking drainage pipes etc with objects in order to create mud runs!
The upside to this thought process is that these people dont have the inclination to figure out how to find lanes, and if they do there far to tight to buy an OS map and know how to use it. They usually find lanes through word of mouth(nothing we can do to stop this)
You talk of responsible use of lanes and of laners needing the info. Responsible laning is encouraged here and help is given to those that ask. The very thread that you are commenting on has instructions on how to find lanes and check them :doh: If people are serious about 'greenlaning' then they WILL find the time and put the effort in.
No one is trying to keep lanes 'secret' or for an 'exclusive group' but by not giving out lane locations on a public forum you stop making it easy for the people that fall into the group above.
I agree that driving lanes is important and that organisations like treadlightly and sites like trailwise are important as they log and record the use of ROW which are shown to councils etc so they can see they are being used. These sites already exist so why not help them out and devote your efforts to maintaining there logs and updating there database like I and many other do.
But there wont be lanes left open to drive if you record the locations and make them readily known to any tom dick and harry.
I am currently drafting a letter to send to the magazines explaining why thats also a bad idea. I have seen the damage caused on some local lanes following there publishing in LRI. I need to get proof from the council of the date a couple of byways had permanent TRO's placed on them, but it happened months after they were published and people turned up from afar to "try and get through"
Obviously i wholeheartedly disagree with your idea and i hope you come to your senses and stop.