As I said earlier it has had much debate good and bad.
Let me start with this.
https://www.carmagazine.co.uk/car-reviews/mazda/mazda-rx-8-hydrogen-re-2007-review/
I don’t have all my research available on this dapple thingy, but will try and answer as I see it.
Lambda sensor, or fuel map adjustments when using HHO. Fuel map is difficult with HHO because of delivery and non measured production, easier with H2 stored in special tanks just like LPG.
A petrol car with a an efficiently working cat puts out large amounts of H2O out the exhaust system anyway
Not strictly true, only when cold and inefficient. Once hot no H2O but still loads of other noxious gases.
Burning H2 is hotter than burning petrol.
We are not strictly talking H2 here(as thread), but HHO. Does LPG burn hotter? But we don’t have problems with it.
And costs. It has to use de-ionized water with an added electrolyte. This will reduce any potential cost savings
Yes I stated this and agree, limitation but not costly to buy but, disposal still questionable.
This HHO generator consumes 30 or more Amps from the electrical system, which will use more petrol to get the process working, basically offsetting any minimal economy gains
Agreed, I stated earlier they are power hungry, and get hot.
A Hydrogen powered car works in a completely different way, and don't have an internal combustion engine
Agreed. But think I did say that.
Manufacture do go the whole hog and do hydrogen fuel cell cars. Which is not the same
Have a look at Stanley Meyer.
It’s some interesting reading. Believe what parts you like but it can’t all be lies.
I am not saying I know it all and am open to discuss. I firmly believe H2 is cleaner than leccy cars.
Production and storage still expensive, but if in 20years I can still drive my V8, or even go back to another RX , I will take it.
J