Series 2 ford transit bannana engine

peter8315

Active Member

Posts

724

Location

Ilkeston, derbyshire

• May 24, 2016

• #1

Just bought a series 2 with a transit bannana engine fitted, its got a milner conversion plate to landy box, sounds great not had chance to try it yet as needs throttle linkage, anybody got any veiws on thie engine?

 

jockmurray

Active Member

Posts

117

• May 25, 2016

• #2

not sure what you mean by banana engine but my mate has a lightweight with a 2.5di transit lump good engine economical and torquey but you will be needing some ear defenders cause its bloody noisy

 

C

Cabbie

Well-Known Member

Full Member

Posts

1,855

Location

Selby, North Yorkshire

• May 25, 2016

• #3

Bunch of banana manifold over the top of the engine. 2.5 DI. Bulletproof engine.

 

Flossie

Well-Known Member

Posts

11,053

Location

Shropshire

• May 25, 2016

• #4

They will run veg as well iirc.

 

peter8315

Active Member

Posts

724

Location

Ilkeston, derbyshire

• May 25, 2016

• #5

thats what i like to hear, bullet proof

 

ciderman

Active Member

Posts

770

Location

sunny worcestershire

• May 27, 2016

• #6

I Have the pre banananananana, great engine- until the cam belt tensioner pulley came off- it snapped - a faulty component when I did the cam belt ,
push rods buggered but engine remains ok.
It is so much superior to the land rover 2.25 or 2.5.
and economical.

 

C

Cabbie

Well-Known Member

Full Member

Posts

1,855

Location

Selby, North Yorkshire

• May 28, 2016

• #7

We've had a couple of cabs with the pre-banana engine and found the same thing - fairly economical, plenty power, easy to fix. Only drawback - a tad noisy.

 

mistericeman

Active Member

Posts

977

Location

peoples republic of ashton-under-lyne ,lancashire

• May 28, 2016

• #8

one of my series 3's has the pre-banana engine fitted ...a bit noisy yes (Being direct injection) BUT mid to late 30's to the gallon and solidly reliable AND will pull the 88 up steep crawls without a heap of tyre shredding as its got plenty of low down torque .

 

Landy-ads

Active Member

Posts

407

Location

Out the front, spanner in hand

• Jun 1, 2016

• #9

My lightweight and 110 both had transit di (pre banana) engines in them. Both now have 200tdi....
Biggest issue is that they can't really be used for proper offroading due to the timing chest and the bellhousing not being sealed, eventually your cambelt will snap and s/motor or clutch get gunked up. Also Can sometimes be tricky to start in v cold weather due to not having glow plugs.

 

mistericeman

Active Member

Posts

977

Location

peoples republic of ashton-under-lyne ,lancashire

• Jun 1, 2016

• #10

If it's difficult to start in any conditions then there's other problems than Di....
Mine has chimed in within a couple of turns even at severely minus temps after being left for 6 months or so...
Yup timing belt is 'supposedly' vulnerable to water however I've never had a problem...
Luck of the draw? Maybe

Serious offroading not suitable...
Hmmm I'd have to argue with that one after some of the fun I've had with mine ;-)

 

Landy-ads

Active Member

Posts

407

Location

Out the front, spanner in hand

• Jun 2, 2016

• #11

Can only speak as I find. Both had the cambelts snap after playing in the mud and wet, timing case ended up full of mud. When I took the engine out on one the bell housing also had mud in it which had affected the clutch.
A hard lesson learned - twice :-(

On the upside, the timing belt is easy to change and you only get bent pushrods, on one I just straightened them out and put em back in, fitted new belt and it fired up fine!