DEATH to all drunk drivers

S

Sir.Tony

Guest

• Apr 3, 2004

• #101

<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Sir.Tony" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> <[email protected]>:
>
> >
> ><[email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >> He doesn't, he's a peeping tom that watches others uninvited.
> >
> >Dont make up stories about me. People always make-up stories when losing
the
> >argument.
>
> Why else are you called Peeping-Tony in the courier community?
>
> >> Graham at Connection Couriers reckons he dresses up in a womans dress-
> >> he said a kaftan- when he does this.
> >>
> >That is just your sexual fantasy.
>
> Nightmare is closer to it.
>

I'm not a peeping tom. Peeping tom are peeping toms, doggers are not peeping
toms.

Doggers are just out door swingers. Most of the people who meet all know
each other, because the same group of people who are meeting all the time.

Get your facts right.

When you talk about doggers, do make sure you know what you are talking
about. Idiot, just like all drunk drivers!

 

D

[email protected]

Guest

• Apr 3, 2004

• #102

"Sir.Tony" <[email protected]> wrote in message
<[email protected]>:

>I'm not a peeping tom. Peeping tom are peeping toms, doggers are not peeping
>toms.

So why do they call you peeping.tony?

--
it's better to burn out than fade away

 

S

Sir.Tony

Guest

• Apr 3, 2004

• #103

<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Sir.Tony" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> <[email protected]>:
>
> >I'm not a peeping tom. Peeping tom are peeping toms, doggers are not
peeping
> >toms.
>
> So why do they call you peeping.tony?
>
They can't tell the difference between a [naturist and a flasher].

 

D

dwb

Guest

• Apr 3, 2004

• #104

"Sir.Tony" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
>
> Doggers are just out door swingers. Most of the people who meet all know
> each other, because the same group of people who are meeting all the time.

So you keep it in the family so to speak?

 

D

Dan Drake

Guest

• Apr 4, 2004

• #105

On Sat, 3 Apr 2004 23:39:47 +0100, "dwb" <[email protected]>
wrote:

>
>"Sir.Tony" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>>
>> Doggers are just out door swingers. Most of the people who meet all know
>> each other, because the same group of people who are meeting all the time.
>
>So you keep it in the family so to speak?
>
Call him, or write and ask him.

Tony Bournes
9 Spansey Court
Halstead
Essex C09 1LW
Tel: 01787 474988
--
Dan Drake

 

P

Pip

Guest

• Apr 4, 2004

• #106

On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 18:26:56 -0500, Dan Drake
<[email protected]> wrote:

>Call him, or write and ask him.
>
>Tony
<snip>

That was fairly stupid.

I hope he complains bitterly to your ISP and has your account toasted.
Posting personal information is a flagrant breach of T&Cs and you
deserve everything you are going to get, clever dan.

--
Pip, Hairy Gfedcker. RF 900RR, Ruff and Rattly.
WS* DFWAG#0 IbW#27* DIAABTCOD#15 GP#0 EKP FUB#4 MKA+E#3
ANORAK#8 MIRTTH#15 BOTAFOT/F#47/34a BONY#13 KotMIB# <space>
UKRMRM#14 TWA#2

 

C

cryptoplatypus

Guest

• Apr 4, 2004

• #107

Dan Drake wrote:

> Call him, or write and ask him.

<snip address>

You know, that really isn't on, matey.

--
Platypus - (unreal)
Triumph Trophy 1200 (omnipresent)
VN800 Drifter (for sale)
R80RT (for sale - spares or repairs)
Z200 (Fear the Distance Monster!)
DIAABTCOD#2 GPOTHUF#19
BOTAFOS#6 BOTAFOT#89 FTB#11
BOB#1 SBS#35 ANORAK#18 TWA#15

 

S

Sir.Tony

Guest

• Apr 4, 2004

• #108

"Pip" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> On Sat, 03 Apr 2004 18:26:56 -0500, Dan Drake
> <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> >Call him, or write and ask him.
> >
> >Tony
> <snip>
>
> That was fairly stupid.
>
> I hope he complains bitterly to your ISP and has your account toasted.
> Posting personal information is a flagrant breach of T&Cs and you
> deserve everything you are going to get, clever dan.
>
I hope so too. That is not my address.

 

S

Stuffed

Guest

• Apr 4, 2004

• #109

"cryptoplatypus" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Dan Drake wrote:
>
> > Call him, or write and ask him.
>
> <snip address>
>
> You know, that really isn't on, matey.

So long as it is actually Sir Titbrain's details, and they have been copied
directly from somewhere the said muppet has publicly posted them (homepage,
another newsgroup post, that sort of thing) then I don't see it as _that_
bad, as surely that would imply consent for them to be posted on other
public forums?

On the other hand, I'd be mightily ****ed off if someone stalked me and
stuck my details online, as I haven't made them public anywhere. And much
though I think sir phoney is an utter **** who would come first second and
third in a world utter **** championship, his details shouldn't be made
public without his implied consent.

 

C

Conor

Guest

• Apr 4, 2004

• #110

In article <l4Fbc.133$ug1.49@newsfe1-win>, [email protected] says...
>
> "Conor" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > In article <[email protected]>,
> > [email protected] says...
> >
> > > OOH! That rich coming from a nasty drunk driver. People who take (legal or
> > > illegal) drugs and drive a car, deserves to die in a road accident (the more
> > > painful...., the better).
> > >
> > WEll you'd better lock me up then. I take Nurofen when I have a
> > headache and I drive a car/HGV.
>
> Tut tut, I bet you take caffeine when on the night shift as well.
>
Damn. Caught bang to rights.


--
Conor

If you're not on somebody's **** list, you're not doing anything
worthwhile.

 

C

Conor

Guest

• Apr 4, 2004

• #111

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...
> Conor <[email protected]> wrote in message
> <[email protected]>:
>
> >In article <[email protected]>,
> >[email protected] says...
> >
> >> All doggers are scum and should be locked up.
> >>
> >Why should someone who chooses to have sex with a stranger in a car
> >park in the middle of nowhere be locked up?
>
> He doesn't, he's a peeping tom that watches others uninvited.
>
AAAHHH. So he's not a dogger then.


--
Conor

If you're not on somebody's **** list, you're not doing anything
worthwhile.

 

C

Conor

Guest

• Apr 4, 2004

• #112

In article <[email protected]>,
[email protected] says...

> Call him, or write and ask him.
>
> Tony Bournes
> 9 Spansey Court
> Halstead
> Essex C09 1LW
> Tel: 01787 474988
>
Why do people seem to think that posting someones personal details on
Usenet is some big thing? Do you lead such a sad life that you see this
as some sort of victory?


--
Conor

If you're not on somebody's **** list, you're not doing anything
worthwhile.

 

P

Pip

Guest

• Apr 4, 2004

• #113

On Sun, 4 Apr 2004 11:52:06 +0100, Conor <[email protected]>
wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>,
>[email protected] says...
>
>> Call him, or write and ask him.
>>
>> Tony
<snip>

>Why do people seem to think that posting someones personal details on
>Usenet is some big thing? Do you lead such a sad life that you see this
>as some sort of victory?

I see you as even sadder for RE-posting the details, ****wit.

--
Pip, Hairy Gfedcker. RF 900RR, Ruff and Rattly.
WS* DFWAG#0 IbW#27* DIAABTCOD#15 GP#0 EKP FUB#4 MKA+E#3
ANORAK#8 MIRTTH#15 BOTAFOT/F#47/34a BONY#13 KotMIB# <space>
UKRMRM#14 TWA#2

 

B

Blippie

Guest

• Apr 4, 2004

• #114

Sir Tony wrote:
>Don't spill your drink, now ;-)

Why don't you just go back to uk.sex.swingers?

Cheers

Blippie
--
Visit the alt.aviation.safety FAQ online at www.blippie.org.uk

 

D

[email protected]

Guest

• Apr 4, 2004

• #115

Conor <[email protected]> wrote in message
<[email protected]>:

>In article <[email protected]>,
>[email protected] says...
>> Conor <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> <[email protected]>:
>>
>> >In article <[email protected]>,
>> >[email protected] says...
>> >
>> >> All doggers are scum and should be locked up.
>> >>
>> >Why should someone who chooses to have sex with a stranger in a car
>> >park in the middle of nowhere be locked up?
>>
>> He doesn't, he's a peeping tom that watches others uninvited.
>>
>AAAHHH. So he's not a dogger then.

He *calls* it dogging, but we all know he's lying.

--
it's better to burn out than fade away

 

C

Conor

Guest

• Apr 4, 2004

• #116

In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
says...

>
> I see you as even sadder for RE-posting the details, ****wit.
>
>
Nah, just couldn't be arsed to snip your ****wittery. The idea of doing
a followup to a post is that you quote the relevent text which I did.
Would you like me to post a link to a guide to help you?


--
Conor

If you're not on somebody's **** list, you're not doing anything
worthwhile.

 

S

Simian

Guest

• Apr 4, 2004

• #117

Conor wrote:
> In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
> says...
>
>> I see you as even sadder for RE-posting the details, ****wit.
>>
> Nah, just couldn't be arsed to snip your ****wittery.

That would have made sense, if Pip had posted the details in the first
place, you moron.


> The idea of doing
> a followup to a post is that you quote the relevent text which I did.
> Would you like me to post a link to a guide to help you?

Your grasp of usenet astounds us all. No, really.


--
'Ray Stringer' ZX7RR.

 

P

Pip

Guest

• Apr 4, 2004

• #118

On Sun, 4 Apr 2004 16:12:31 +0100, Conor <[email protected]>
wrote:

>In article <[email protected]>, [email protected]
>says...

>> I see you as even sadder for RE-posting the details, ****wit.

>Nah, just couldn't be arsed to snip your ****wittery.

My ****wittery? You didn't reply to me, numbnuts.

>The idea of doing
>a followup to a post is that you quote the relevent text which I did.

With use of selective snipping, which by your own admission you
"couldn't be arsed" to do.

>Would you like me to post a link to a guide to help you?

Yeah, go on then.

--
Pip, Hairy Gfedcker. RF 900RR, Ruff and Rattly.
WS* DFWAG#0 IbW#27* DIAABTCOD#15 GP#0 EKP FUB#4 MKA+E#3
ANORAK#8 MIRTTH#15 BOTAFOT/F#47/34a BONY#13 KotMIB# <space>
UKRMRM#14 TWA#2

 

S

Sir.Tony

Guest

• Apr 5, 2004

• #119

<[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> "Sir.Tony" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> <[email protected]>:
>
>
> >I'm sorry to disappoint you, I'm not gay.
>
> I didn't say you were.
>
> I did say you were a skat-munching, public ****ing, mouth breathing
> pervert though.
>
> >The only reason why you drink so-much, you just cant handle you
homosexual
> >feelings.
>
> I rarely drink. Only if I've a long journey ahead of me.
>
Dogging was just some rubbish I posted about a year ago and you are still on
about it? Drunk drivers a scum & you lost the argument. No-one is as low as
a drunk driver.

 

G

geoff

Guest

• Apr 6, 2004

• #120

In message <[email protected]>, Sir.Tony
<[email protected]> writes
>
><[email protected]> wrote in message
>news:[email protected]...
>> "Sir.Tony" <[email protected]> wrote in message
>> <[email protected]>:
>>
>>
>> >I'm sorry to disappoint you, I'm not gay.
>>
>> I didn't say you were.
>>
>> I did say you were a skat-munching, public ****ing, mouth breathing
>> pervert though.
>>
>> >The only reason why you drink so-much, you just cant handle you
>homosexual
>> >feelings.
>>
>> I rarely drink. Only if I've a long journey ahead of me.
>>
>Dogging was just some rubbish I posted about a year ago and you are still on
>about it? Drunk drivers a scum & you lost the argument. No-one is as low as
>a drunk driver.
>
>
Idi Armin was OK by you then ?
--
geoff