Yes there is a reason but find out yourself. Advice is free, but if you choose to ignore it that is your problem.ok, so no reason then. other than you don't like your statements questioned
yawn.... what reason.... it doesn't matter, maybe one of the arms is fractionally bent on one of the sensors
The variance in readings from the sensors across the axle is critical because that's the way the EAS software is written to expect them.I doubt that, but I don't see how it can be an issue how the sensors read, if they are being physically calibrated against each other? You said there was reason, so maybe I'm missing something ? The not invented here syndrome is just starting to grind me down
The variance in readings from the sensors across the axle is critical because that's the way the EAS software is written to expect them.
Obviously a smart arse Keith let him find out for himself.
I was the only one who answered the OPs question. The rest of this thread seems to have been mainly dedicated to "let's show the new kid who's boss". Thanks to those of you who provided civil input though.
I think I'm the only one here who actually answered the OPs question about how to make/ use the calibration blocks.
I was the only one who answered the OPs question. The rest of this thread seems to have been mainly dedicated to "let's show the new kid who's boss". Thanks to those of you who provided civil input though.
I didn't say that your input didn't matter Wammers- although granted it could have been read that way - I meant that the 2 step difference doesn't matter as far as I can see, hence the EAS heights are programmable in the ECU, within an expected range (which I don't know, but is way more than 2 steps wide for each ride height). If the difference is more than 2 steps what are you suggesting? New sensors? My yawn was out of being multi-teamed by you guys.
You seem to think that just because I registered on LZ two weeks ago that that's when I first got a P38, wammers. Quite simply, that's not true. Or if it is my P38 has developed a special immunityI was giving you good info, you poohooed it, there is a reason that the fronts need to be set no more than two bits side to side, rear doesn't matter. You will find out when your car enters TVs greatest dancer competition.
You did not answer the OP's question, you actually just suggested using calibration blocks as an attempt to overcome what is obviously a fault. The car leans but recovers when driven, that could be a duff sensor, corroded connections to the sensor or a leaking airspring. Sitting it on calibration blocks will achieve nothing because the car recovers to level when driven so how would the calibration be a problem?I was the only one who answered the OPs question. The rest of this thread seems to have been mainly dedicated to "let's show the new kid who's boss". Thanks to those of you who provided civil input though.
Look you carry on no problem. But i will say again the front bit counts should be within 2 bits side to side. At least that's what Land rover say but what do they know. You obviously don't know as much as you think you know. When Land rover set the EAS in the factory they only use two sets of blocks one to set access height and one to set standard height. They set the front bit count within 2 bits side to side. It is important to do that. I don't care how long you have had a P38 you obviously don't know why that is. Until you do stop giving out duff info.You seem to think that just because I registered on LZ two weeks ago that that's when I first got a P38, wammers. Quite simply, that's not true. Or if it is my P38 has developed a special immunity
Welcome To LandyZone, the Land Rover Forums!
Here at LandyZone we have plenty of very knowledgable members so if you have any questions about your Land Rover or just want to connect with other Landy owners, you're in the right place.
Registering is free and easy just click here, we hope to see you on the forums soon!