Land_girl
Well-Known Member
I would love to get a scraper on that to find out but I daren't now!yes thks, can see the pics
would be interesting to see what they tried to cover up under that bitumen,
I would love to get a scraper on that to find out but I daren't now!yes thks, can see the pics
would be interesting to see what they tried to cover up under that bitumen,
Thanks Mick, I hope so too!Interesting case, hope you get a refund.
I would love to get a scraper on that to find out but I daren't now!
Its almost asking to be scraped off! Alas, I wont.noooooooooo, but indeed bloody tempting ,
Now sent me a message saying he thinks he has a solution so can i call him.
Yes I posted this morning the UPDATE... you may have to scroll back a bit to find it.Any update on this?
Hi guys, I wanted to get some feedback from all you knowledgeable people.
I brought my disco 2 from a guy last week, hes a car dealer of sorts (buys and sells cars from home).
When I brought it he had just MOTed it, came with a few advisories mainly corrosion (as expected on this age motor) put it did pass. One of the advisories was new tyres all round.
I went to my local formula one auto centre yesterday to have all new tyres on and ask if they would give it a once over while they had it.
The guy in the garage said there was no way it should have passed an MOT with the 'corrosion' it has in the areas it does... Front wheel arch/floor (egg sized whole) near the 'front strut' and the rear leg has been caked in thick black stuff covering a large amount of 'corrosion'.
After this info I started looking for someone who could repair or replace the rear quarter and weld the front hole... but my concern is 'its not safe'?
I appreciate that some garages are more 'picky' than others with regards to MOT but I don't see what my garage has to gain from saying how bad it is, given they said they wouldn't be able to do any repair work (nor do they know anyone who they recommend). Am I worrying too much? I brought this to tow my caravan but given what my garage have said I dont think I should? Any feedback would be good. thanks.
Yes I posted this morning the UPDATE... you may have to scroll back a bit to find it.
Dont let him take the car without giving you your money back first, he could do anything with itARGH!!! he is now saying he wants to collect the car and return my money in 30 days. should i allow that? what if he wrecks the car and doesn't pay up?
Thats exactly what I've told him. Just wasn't sure if I should allow him to or not.Dont let him take the car without giving you your money back first, he could do anything with it
ARGH!!! he is now saying he wants to collect the car and return my money in 30 days. should i allow that? what if he wrecks the car and doesn't pay up?
Tell him you want the cash now, but promise him that you won't spend it for 30 days!ARGH!!! he is now saying he wants to collect the car and return my money in 30 days. should i allow that? what if he wrecks the car and doesn't pay up?
He wants to sell the car before he pays me back! How can he do that anyway, he doesn't have the log book?
Yes but surely the new owner is going to want the V5? I don't intend on giving him the car before the refund. Just couldn't make out how he thinks he can sell the car without the V5?Log book is not proof of ownership, only registered keeper.
I personally would not agree to letting him try and sell it before he refunds me, if it was my problem.
Cheers