borristherat
New Member
you missed geothermal
you missed geothermal
but it does include geothermal.closed loop sytem clean as clean can get.
borristherat
New Member
oh pcdev2004 and using the methane from your own ****, reading your other posts, thier should be plenty of that to power the planet.
ratty
I'm not special I'm limited edition
Your whole arguement based on fact has been blown out of the water based on fact yet you still want to stand there and argue that black is white.
I think you'll find that the fool is the one that is changing their 'facts'....
Oh..... that'd be you.
borristherat
New Member
agreed but it requires compressors and so large electricity usage to run them.
not to mention the huge installation costs.
Depends where ya are, iceland have really simple sytems.
and not so good for powering cars, a little inconveiniant:jaw:
borristherat
New Member
yep just come back from iceland. 98% of energy is geothermic. cant see it happening in the uk this week though, can you?
The hydrogen system will one day power all cars, but currently it takes, as I'm sure you all know, more energy to break the H-O bonds in water through electrolysis than is released by the formation of H-O bonds during the combustion of H2, simply because there is of course an efficiency gradient. One day though when all electricity comes from fusion there will be such a surplus that every car can run on hydrogen
Datatek
Well-Known Member
Thorium saltwater reactors are the cleanest way to generate electricity with current knowledge and technology, but for some reason the powers that be prefer highly radioactive, dangerous, Uranium reactors. Perhaps it's because they like to make bombs and Thorium is not suitable for that purpose.
Freelaner
Landy Driver
the last sentence is the answer to why we aint got em
if we can't use it to produce weapons it's of no use, bloody typical
Not quite because that's the energy source thats beats all others
At least we have some one here with some intelligence.
Datatek
Well-Known Member
Two years ago I discovered that with the aid of about 5 litres of petrol, I could reduce my central heating oil consuption from 2,200 litres per annum to between 400 & 500 litres per annum. This means I am paying less for my heating oil now than I was before the oil price rise.
jt_armstrong
Well-Known Member
What magic is that? We use about 1000 lts of heating oil a month during winter. Anything to improve that has got be shared. Mind you next month I will spending my hard earned on air con so maybe I don't care about the answer as much as I should.
Datatek
Well-Known Member
The petrol goes into my chainsaw and I cut down trees on my land to feed the wood burning cooker with back boiler I installed. Result, we are warmer than we have ever been in my old mill house and use oil only for a short time before I get up and light the fire
The excercise is good for me too
Clarky130
New Member
Saw all this crap about HHO a year or so ago... The geezer that wad peddling it over in the states was a known serial fraudster and snake-oil salesman...
A good long t'internet session yielded a full scientific analysis, with numbers and equations as proof, that it was all total hoop... But then anybody with half a brain could tell you that 'you don't get owt for nowt'...
A good long t'internet session yielded a full scientific analysis, with numbers and equations as proof, that it was all total hoop... But then anybody with half a brain could tell you that 'you don't get owt for nowt'...
Actually you inject hho in the air stream of the oil boiler and the result is all the
oil is burned completely. of course this can't work and you can't save a tank on oil a year with only water can you ?. ........ been there doing it.
