Sexy swivels mate!

I wonder.. I dream of good rockers, mine are ok but could be better.
if they are by chance in good condition would you consider passing them on?
 
Hey mate

I do need the rockers for this engine, unless I end up with more but most heads are supplied without

I don't think the rockers are that good anyway tbh, what would you describe as good?

These have a light step in the shaft, a valve mark on the pad and seem to have some play BUT I haven't fully inspected them tbh
 
Picked up a 100A alternator cheap



Well, actually swapped a SD1 timing cover for it and a tidy LR sump and pickup, for the other engine, seeing as I had only an SD1 sump spare.

Will get the alternator cleaned up and fitted, bearings in mine are very noisy!
 
However, something's rustling in the workshop:



Very early stages (read:just pulled out of the corner after 18 months) of a future engine build.

Gonna strip this down to the bare block and sell/scrap bits I don't need, keep myself entertained :)


Leaning towards a V8 for my next project... Are you replacing the liners on this one? If so how are the new ones "Shrunk in"? I've done a google on it but couldn't find much....
 
It's a 3.5 mate so won't need any serious work, just a 20thou rebore to bust that lip

I really don't know much about engine work if I'm honest so couldn't answer your question, where's JM? :p
 
It's a 3.5 mate so won't need any serious work, just a 20thou rebore to bust that lip

I really don't know much about engine work if I'm honest so couldn't answer your question, where's JM? :p

and the special sauce.... :D are you replacing anything else? changing the cam etc? going old school with carbs?...
 
3.5's don't have liner problems, its the 3.9's up..
If you're going to re liner one, it might as well be a 4.6 and give it a top hat liner as it solves the problem with slipping liners
 
and the special sauce.... :D are you replacing anything else? changing the cam etc? going old school with carbs?...

Disclaimer:

Don't expect to see any serious progress with this engine this year.

Looooong term plan is rebore +20 with either 8.13 or 9.35 pistons once decided, serp crank/front end, 4.6 heads with valve train work to accommodate blower cam and probably a jaguar sourced eaton m112

This whole thing will purely depend on funds, time, boredom and other repairs /mods etc to the car, because it is completely unnecessary.

Still got lots to do and I have a great engine installed as we speak.

The amount of things that will need altering for forced induction is more than meets the eye so it's not something that will happen overnight.

But, once I've cleared the decks of the engine parts I don't need, it'll be easier for me to collect the bits I do need.

First job will be to build the short motor.

Cheers :)
 
3.5's don't have liner problems, its the 3.9's up..
If you're going to re liner one, it might as well be a 4.6 and give it a top hat liner as it solves the problem with slipping liners

I was just wondering how they shrink fit liners? Is it a case of uniformly heating the block before inserting the liner then letting the block shrink back as it cools?

It seems there are a million things you can do to improve the RV8 to firstly get it back to 165 bhp then onwards to 200 bhp... Could just start with a Chevy engine :D
 
I was just wondering how they shrink fit liners? Is it a case of uniformly heating the block before inserting the liner then letting the block shrink back as it cools?

It seems there are a million things you can do to improve the RV8 to firstly get it back to 165 bhp then onwards to 200 bhp... Could just start with a Chevy engine :D

Not sure on that but I would imagine that would be the case.. cool the liners and heat the block.

Sam what pistons are in there atm?
Mine are 8's would consider a swap possibly
 
I have 9.35 pistons dude, all in tidy condition etc with matched caps

Yeah sounds ideal to me but are yours +20 thou?

not knowing enough about FI, some say you will melt if not less than 8.5 CR, others inc zen say that it's fine and/or run it 9.35 and it's better performer off boost, use less boost which means more efficiency generally

If you go to 8.13 to make power through boost them economy will be bad I assume, seeing as you're building a more inefficient engine, despite the fact the CR allows you to make more peak power that probably means most of the time it's not as good as a higher CR engine that has less peak but more linear power band and probably considerably tastier midrange

Anyway

Yeah you got a deal if I decide that's what's best but just don't know otherwise.
 
Well yeah, expensive pistons being a way to increase post boost CR (either by static CR or more boost I guess) without melting

I need to do this on the cheap or it's pointless

Good thing about 9.35 is it's better investment if having to buy +20 pistons

Stick an NA cam and new followers in it and it's a good NA engine a couple hours later, 8.13 block is always gonna need boost

Just DO NOT know the answer

How has zen got away with 10.5 @ 10psi?! Unless very careful ignition timing and fueling and everyone doing it on carbs in the old days couldn't manage it
 
250bhp would be a sensible target tbh, don't actually know how it would get on

It's not getting forged pistons end of

If it turns out supercharging is not particularly viable it'll just get a hot cam

I'm prepared to put a fair bit of work into the heads regards guides and springs etc so they'll suit either a hot NA or FI cam
 
I was just wondering how they shrink fit liners? Is it a case of uniformly heating the block before inserting the liner then letting the block shrink back as it cools?

It seems there are a million things you can do to improve the RV8 to firstly get it back to 165 bhp then onwards to 200 bhp... Could just start with a Chevy engine :D

heat block a few hundred degrees and liquid nitrogen freeze the liners.
Google explains it well. and saw a Ferrari engine being built on a show How do they do that
 
Boost is always an option.. just how much.
Most stock engines wil take 5 psi without any qualms.
why super charge and not turbo? turbo's are better efficiency as it uses waste power and are easy to work with.
 

Similar threads