I'd like to re-awaken this thread, if I may...
I'm looking for another vehicle and whilst head says an M Class Mercedes (sorry), heart says another Range Rover.
The budget would stretch to a cheap, early L322, or a nice, late P38.
My simple question is, could either of them be relied upon in harsh conditions?
I had a 4.0SE P38 and it drove me crazy, finally locking me out of the car when parked on a double yellow line (where it stayed until I obtained some bizarre code from the supplying dealer).
Are things any better? The vehicle would be diesel.
Hmmm... beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
P38 (to me) ... is better looking.
Hmmm... beauty is in the eye of the beholder. The P38 has grown on me (possibly as the Metrocab has died out), but the L322 to me just looks amazing. Each to their own.
The front diff thing seems to have been cured by a recall?
Is there anything else likely to grind the beast to a halt?
I totally agee with all you say.Short answer is L322 is better. Post 2005 most of the early edition problems were ironed out. But P38 (to me) has more personality and is better looking. Someone commented on the rear lights of the L322 and I totally agree, they make the car look cheap and later face-lifts gave it a weak chin to boot. The pseudo angular look trying to recall a design masterpiece like the RR Classic also doesn't quite work for me. Lets put it this way, first P38 I ever saw I thought it was gorgeous, just so sophisticated looking. And it hasn't aged. First L322 I saw I thought it was abominable, something made specifically for newly minted Eastern European moguls or American rappers however I must admit that over time it has grown on me next to the ridiculous looking Lexii and GLKs and so forth.
FWIW I still own a P38 but had a brand new L322 from work for a couple of years. Definitely the L322 was a better place to be inside of but if anything went wrong you never dared to have a poke and try to fix it while with the P38 you can.
Interesting that you'd option for Arnott air springs over a coil conversion... The air suspension is great, but I hate being dependant on an electric pump.
The old ZF auto used to be the most reliable part of a RR! What went wrong!?
The M Class is unreliable by Merc standards, but the problems aren't of the strand you in the middle of nowhere type. Poor panel fit and the odd leak I've become used to!
And coils are much better if you want to roll your p38Thats good advice, Datatek, though things like split airbags, airlines, valves etc are a worry too.
I did like the air suspension on the 4.0SE and it was the best tow car ever. But reliability is everything and I don't much enjoy being underneath cars - especially when it's hot and dusty!
Other than the loss of height control there's not much that air springs do that coils don't do, and there's none of the complexity.
Thats good advice, Datatek, though things like split airbags, airlines, valves etc are a worry too.
I did like the air suspension on the 4.0SE and it was the best tow car ever. But reliability is everything and I don't much enjoy being underneath cars - especially when it's hot and dusty!
Other than the loss of height control there's not much that air springs do that coils don't do, and there's none of the complexity.
And coils are much better if you want to roll your p38
So airbags can split, coils can break, give me air any time
Have never seen a routemaster bus doing 80 mph up the motorway nor have i seen many being off roaded.:laugh:Really?
The P38 is pretty wide. Instinct says it's centre of gravity would be lower than a RR Classic, and certainly lower than a Discovery.
Incidentally, a Routemaster bus does without air springs, and they are pretty hard to roll.
In fact, with the air springs set to resist roll, there's little warning that you are approaching the limits of the tyres grip - just the circumstances when a slide will see you clip a kerb and initiate a roll.
Ask any early Range Rover or 2CV driver...