Had a lovely old mongrel beating dog back in the 90s whoβd do anything you asked him but heβd always hide behind a tree. I swear blind he felt embarrassed.
Yes.Is the voltage the same as the UK and Amps
He's my mate anorl.Me bestest buddy Ernie paid out twice today . A crisp Β£50 and an even crispier Β£100. I shall now consider retirement to nice island in the med
That all makes sense now got a mental picture we have the black ones as the walnuts are now formed on the tree's thay are munching through themA squiggle, working his way round a walnut.
J
Glad you sold your bike.Mornin
Bright side of dull today
Takin friends garden rubbish to the tip today, if they'll let me in with the truck
Making spare wheel carrier if I have time
Sold motorcycle so need to modify my bike trailer before weekend as it's rubbish
Nothing else in the diary although lots to do
Stay alert all
On your first point, it doesn't, cos schools only receive money per pupil. So it cannot help ornery schools, in fact if it "creams" the school like local grammars do it makes things worse. The school I taught in was creamed by two grammars and a few private schools. Creaming removes the incentive and/ or role models of intellingent hardworking pupils, in which case being a "boff" is seen as not being "cool" so bright kids quickly learn to disguise their abilities for fear of being bullied. This only reverses in the 6th form.Eye always fort private education was good. It took the pressure oft normal schools and helped thems a bit cleverer. Some private schools let normal schools use their sports fings. Or hand over books and kit they dun't need. But then eye realised its buying an advantage for yer kid because yer got the sovs to do it. That makes it unfair.
If they closed private schools today, more kids would go to normal schools tomorrow. The sovs per pupil would not rise. The gov and council would not give over more sovs. Class sizes would rise. So normal schools would be worse oft.On your first point, it doesn't, cos schools only receive money per pupil. So it cannot help ornery schools, in fact if it "creams" the school like local grammars do it makes things worse. The school I taught in was creamed by two grammars and a few private schools. Creaming removes the incentive and/ or role models of intellingent hardworking pupils, in which case being a "boff" is seen as not being "cool" so bright kids quickly learn to disguise their abilities for fear of being bullied. This only reverses in the 6th form.
Scholarships/exhibitions/bursaries are a way of helping the impecunious send their offspring to them and the armed forces always helped parents or their peeps send them to them, which quite surprised me when I realised how many of my mates' dads were "Major this" or "Captain that" or even lower ranks.
But there are few scholarships in any public school, they are achieved through competitive exams and only the (yes there is usually only one) Open scholarship pays the fees in full, then there will be a couple of majors a couple of minors an exhibition or two and in my school a cash prize! which made me laugh!
But I cannot agree with you more about the unfairness of rich peeps being able to buy an educartion for their kids. This led to a full blown row with my mother, the fee-payer who asked if I wanted her to "take me away". I'd have said "yes" if it wasn't for the fact that enjoyed the activities in the school, like the sport and I hated her and didn't want to go back to living at home!
Should have done though, I'd have achieved more!