R
Richard Brookman
Guest
hugh wrote:
|| If there is no reduction or relief for remorse or good behaviour then
|| there is no incentive but the reductions which are given have become
|| disproportionate.
Unless of course you reverse the principle: the sentence is handed down on
the assumption of "good behaviour", with the promise of extra time for "bad
behaviour".
Ten years for armed robbery. Add 10% to the sentence for every misdemeanour
while inside, 50% for each escape attempt, double sentence for assaulting a
prison officer, and so on. I know in some cases we would end up with guys
inside for a thousand years, and I know it would be expensive, but with a
good chance of not getting caught, and lenient sentencing when you are, it's
no wonder a lot of people are seeing crime as a viable career alternative.
--
Rich
==============================
I don't approve of signatures, so I don't have one.
|| If there is no reduction or relief for remorse or good behaviour then
|| there is no incentive but the reductions which are given have become
|| disproportionate.
Unless of course you reverse the principle: the sentence is handed down on
the assumption of "good behaviour", with the promise of extra time for "bad
behaviour".
Ten years for armed robbery. Add 10% to the sentence for every misdemeanour
while inside, 50% for each escape attempt, double sentence for assaulting a
prison officer, and so on. I know in some cases we would end up with guys
inside for a thousand years, and I know it would be expensive, but with a
good chance of not getting caught, and lenient sentencing when you are, it's
no wonder a lot of people are seeing crime as a viable career alternative.
--
Rich
==============================
I don't approve of signatures, so I don't have one.