I've noticed recently that whilst in LR circles the trusty 110 is still the defacto Overland vehicle due to it robust nature, ease of maintenance (pre-Td5, anyway!), reasonable reliability and versatility, the Disco II is becoming more and more popular.
Sat in a traffic jam opposite two Disco II's this morning, it got me thinking what makes that any better for such work than my RR Classic? I mean, they are basically the same vehicle underneath AFAIK and, being a soft dash, the drivers area of mine at least is the same too - so just as comfortable with as many creature comforts.
Most people choose the Td5 over the V8, but the Classic's 200/300Tdi I would say is more suitable than the Td5 due to its simplicity and proven reliability.
So how come so many people use the Disco II, and yet relatively few seem to use the Classic? Also, mine is on EAS which a lot of people advise to remove, yet most Disco II's have EAS on the rear, and pretty much all Disco 3/4's also are on air suspension, and yet they too are becoming more and more popular for Overlanding.
Thoughts?
Sat in a traffic jam opposite two Disco II's this morning, it got me thinking what makes that any better for such work than my RR Classic? I mean, they are basically the same vehicle underneath AFAIK and, being a soft dash, the drivers area of mine at least is the same too - so just as comfortable with as many creature comforts.
Most people choose the Td5 over the V8, but the Classic's 200/300Tdi I would say is more suitable than the Td5 due to its simplicity and proven reliability.
So how come so many people use the Disco II, and yet relatively few seem to use the Classic? Also, mine is on EAS which a lot of people advise to remove, yet most Disco II's have EAS on the rear, and pretty much all Disco 3/4's also are on air suspension, and yet they too are becoming more and more popular for Overlanding.
Thoughts?