VCU mileage?

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.
hi guys,just to say my vans done 140k mainly driven motorway miles,original vcu ,its 5 years old,thinking time might be a factor on vcu wear ? tim.
 
original vcu still on at 109,000 miles, although i am concerned about stiffness in the thing, i must get round to mhm's suggestion of doing a torque test.
 
When I test drove the 2002 TD4 Auto I've just bought, being mindful of this 70 000 mile figure,( its done 72K,) I'd read about here and elswhere, I did a few full lock turns at tickover speed both forwards and reverse. I could only detect the slightest braking effect which vanished as soon as the steering lock was reduced.
I guess that the loss of flexibility in the coupling is gradual, the stiffness gets worse with time and milage? As I have to use full lock whilst reversing, daily, to get into my parking space at home, perhaps noticing a gradual increase in this braking effect with time could be used as an indication of failure? How stiff is dangerous to the IRD/Diff I wonder?
 
As a general observation, having read the plethora of information on here and having spoken via telephone to various land rover specialists.... bearing in mind I am nothing more than a hobby-mechanic at best.

A torque test of any kind will only give you a 'number' which is relative to.... nothing!

Even if you had the original torque from a brand new vcu and then compared it to the torque of various other 'used' vcu's it would simply be another number on a wrench. No more no less.

It doesn't help with warning you of an imminent 'breakdown', or catastrophic failure, or help with diagnosing any other drivetrain issue.

As a test it would simply be a comparison of torque numbers without any relative consequence.

Just my twopenceworth.

Thanks for all the responses.
 
As a general observation, having read the plethora of information on here and having spoken via telephone to various land rover specialists.... bearing in mind I am nothing more than a hobby-mechanic at best.

A torque test of any kind will only give you a 'number' which is relative to.... nothing!

Even if you had the original torque from a brand new vcu and then compared it to the torque of various other 'used' vcu's it would simply be another number on a wrench. No more no less.

It doesn't help with warning you of an imminent 'breakdown', or catastrophic failure, or help with diagnosing any other drivetrain issue.

As a test it would simply be a comparison of torque numbers without any relative consequence.

Just my twopenceworth.

Thanks for all the responses.
Yer all talk you is. . . . .:D
 
Exactly. That was my point. I can only conclude from that, that they think its a "replace when defective" item, similar to a clutch, or brake pads.
I agree that when in any doubt, it is best to replace it. It is just that I have not seen any statements saying "replace at 70K miles". I would like some form of concensus on this, rather than a figure just bandied about, without substantiation.


Just put viscous 70000 miles in google. Plenty of RECOMENDATIONS on there. Like Harold said. i would rather listen to someone in the know and who makes a living from refurbishing these units than someone on a forum who thinks they may know. Just like car manufacturers recomend a service every so many thousand miles. Most people dont service theire car at the recommended mileage due to one reason or another. But the service interval is still recomended. So once again you seem to have twisted my answer to Harolds question as it was the word RECOMENDED that i used and not, "you must".
 
Last edited:
Just put viscous 70000 miles in google. Plenty of RECOMENDATIONS on there. Like Harold said. i would rather listen to someone in the know and who makes a living from refurbishing these units than someone on a forum who thinks they may know. Just like car manufacturers recomend a service every so many thousand miles. Most people dont service theire car at the recommended mileage due to one reason or another. But the service interval is still recomended. So once again you seem to have twisted my answer to Harolds question as it was the word RECOMENDED that i used and not, "you must".
FFS calm down will yer ,if yer that worried just fit a new wun, flippy man was only giving his opinion ,if you dont like the thoughts and help on this forum then feck off. . . .:mad::mad::mad:
 
FFS calm down will yer ,if yer that worried just fit a new wun, flippy man was only giving his opinion ,if you dont like the thoughts and help on this forum then feck off. . . .:mad::mad::mad:

:hysterically_laughi:hysterically_laughi Im calm. And im not worried. I just fitted a new one. What makes you think it was me who needed a new one. Not reading all the posts?? i was just giving my opinion to a question. :doh: isn't that what forums are for?? Geezzzz, you landy owners need to get laid more often :mooning:
 
Last edited:
:hysterically_laughi:hysterically_laughi What makes you think it was me who needed a new one. Not reading all the posts?? i was just giving my opinion to a question. :doh: isn't that what forums are for?? Geezzzz, you landy owners need to get laid more often :mooning:
Um ok then :eek: :eek: :eek: er. . . . . floppy can feck off instead :mad:
 
There's a lack of information about this.

As we all know, the VCU/IRD ratio was changed circa 2001. Therefore, do newer VCU's need to be replaced at the same mileage as older ones?

Initial VCU problems were the result of a design flaw. This issue was addressed, even though it doesn't mean that newer VCU's are bullet proof. With that logic in mind, does that mean to suggest that VCU's built after 2001 have a longer lifespan?
 
There's a lack of information about this.

:hysterically_laughi

Absolutely! And, there is still no specific information on what the lifespan is of any VCU - there are only recommendations as to when it is advisable to change it.

All very confusing!

Going by the few answers to mileage etc. and with mine also on 109k miles I might just keep going until I feel the characteristics of the car become noticeably unacceptable.
 
Dont think there is an answer to this but Rich M has a good point, however some give up at low milage, but a lot of high mile'rs about now mine included, :D:D:D
 
There's a lack of information about this.

As we all know, the VCU/IRD ratio was changed circa 2001. Therefore, do newer VCU's need to be replaced at the same mileage as older ones?

Initial VCU problems were the result of a design flaw. This issue was addressed, even though it doesn't mean that newer VCU's are bullet proof. With that logic in mind, does that mean to suggest that VCU's built after 2001 have a longer lifespan?


Yes a fair point, the earlier ratio was 0.8% difference, it was Taipan who jacked up all 4 wheels to witness a 1 in 120 rotation difference between front and back (IIRC it was in one of the mega threads on 2wd/4wd)

If tyres are the same size, then thats a 1 degree slip in 120 degrees or 3 degrees in a full 360 rotation (someone correct me if I'm wrong here)

According to here The Viscous Coupling

The VCU should lock in under a quarter turn, which is governed by pressure/expansion (Silicone volume is around 84% remaining 16% air)...see attachment

Having looked at this again and with recent discussions, could the new ratio be negligable on the VCU....................I dunno, just floating some ideas............light bulb fizzles out
 

Attachments

  • VCtemp.jpg
    VCtemp.jpg
    46.4 KB · Views: 147
Hi NI - searched the 2003 std Rave for VCU testing and found nowt.
If your pc's gettin stuffed by Rave then your not doing it right. :confused:
Mine runs by putting the cd in and starting the RAVE.exe file, starts acrobat4 from the disk anorl.
Even runs like that from HD or a pen drive?? :)
 
VISCOUS COUPLING
Rating:
Max 440 Nm (325 lbf.ft) @75 rpm .....................................
Min 360 Nm (265 lbf.ft) @75 rpm ......................................

As mentioned in previous discussion, it's also about the speed that the vcu will slip without exceeding the max torque.
 
VISCOUS COUPLING
Rating:
Max 440 Nm (325 lbf.ft) @75 rpm .....................................
Min 360 Nm (265 lbf.ft) @75 rpm ......................................

As mentioned in previous discussion, it's also about the speed that the vcu will slip without exceeding the max torque.

Brill. Thanks Chaser. I assume that is at the VCU. It will be different at the wheel, of course, because of the diff gearing and the friction therein.
 
Last edited:
VISCOUS COUPLING
Rating:
Max 440 Nm (325 lbf.ft) @75 rpm .....................................
Min 360 Nm (265 lbf.ft) @75 rpm ......................................

As mentioned in previous discussion, it's also about the speed that the vcu will slip without exceeding the max torque.

Great stuff, do you know where those figures were sourced? LR tech bulletin perhaps?
 
Back
Top