Don't know if its been discussed?
Last edited:
With the government in it's current state I would think anything is possible, they'll be thinking of all the money they can rake in, we're all well aware they want to take away our freedom and our steakRubbish.... done to death.... fixing a chassis is NOT modifying a chassis.
Modifying the chassis to take a EV motor would be a modification which would cause Q plate.
Current state ?With the government in it's current state I would think anything is possible, they'll be thinking of all the money they can rake in, we're all well aware they want to take away our freedom and our steak
That gov link doesn't exist
Just something I overheard from the world economic forum.Current state ?
Why do they want our freedom again ? I feel quite free here ? maybe a little underpaid and over taxed.
Whether the chap is desperate for views or not, the government survey is real and if they are trying to bring in more stringent rules it might be of concern, I wouldn't want mine on a Q plate because I had a galvanised chassis replacement and then have to pay ved.IMHO anyone who uses "must watch" in a thumbnail is desperate for views.
Of course they are.... there are a lot of folk buying older vehicles and trying to mod them and make them suitable for modern /other use....which isn't what the intention of heritage was. Heritage = having a classic, loving the classic, keeping the classic.Whether the chap is desperate for views or not, the government survey is real and if they are trying to bring in more stringent rules it might be of concern, I wouldn't want mine on a Q plate because I had a galvanised chassis replacement and then have to pay ved.
Major modifications is that.... Major..... I would think replacing a rear cross member with same dimensions but 2mm thicker would not be major tbh. The goal is to make it last not change the job/function.No they don't sound unreasonable, I personally just thought it of concern they may change the rules on what is thought of as a "chassis repair " to be a major modification.
If your goal is to keep a historic vehicle I wouldn't worry.... tbh there is that much variation and inconsistency in the way rules are applied you will be fine. When a group of us registered Year 81 vehicles for historic some were passed, others were rejected, some had odd dates on the V5 so were rejected, some were imported so had odder dates. At the end of the day they were all perfectly valid vehicles for the 40 year rule and got through in the end.I'm getting on a bit and after having this vehicle for thirty years I'm just getting a little twitchy, I'm probably paranoid!
I don't think it will ever viable to remove the engine and gearbox from an old landy and implant with an electric drivetrain so it's not an issue.
The only issue will be when fuel becomes unavailable.. ie too expensive to buy, making your classic car a museum piece
IMHO anyone who uses "must watch" in a thumbnail is desperate for views.
20 years ago it probably wasn't possible in 10 years it would be viable?I didn't say it wasn't possible i said not viable
Welcome To LandyZone, the Land Rover Forums!
Here at LandyZone we have plenty of very knowledgable members so if you have any questions about your Land Rover or just want to connect with other Landy owners, you're in the right place.
Registering is free and easy just click here, we hope to see you on the forums soon!