suspension best choice

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.
B

bikermangs

Member
Posts
45
Location
s yorks
Back again guys , this may sound strange but pick up my p38 on Tuesday and didn't realise till today told by the dealer , that it has had the suspension conversation done , I've been reading on forums etc about the pros and cons of the air suspension just in case I had a problem some time, I had got used to the idea of raising it for off road and self leveling for towing caravan , now that's gone lol, my question is should I be happy or sad to have springs fitted, what's the pros and cons to both , and will I notice a difference in ride quality, thanks for replying, mick .
 
Its chalk and cheese. The chassis was designed for air suspension, and rides super smooth its also self leveling. You also should inform your insurance company,as its not a standard fitment.
 
The P38 EAS system in my opinion is the reason for the smooth handling of my P38. I would never consider putting either of my P38s on coils [GALLERY=];)[/GALLERY]
 
drive it a bit and see how it feels mine drives great on coils but air would be a smoother ride. it also depends on what needs replacing as in my case i would need the whole lot compressor, valve block and air bags costing ££££
 
danb79 said:
drive it a bit and see how it feels mine drives great on coils but air would be a smoother ride. it also depends on what needs replacing as in my case i would need the whole lot compressor, valve block and air bags costing ££££
Click to expand...

Still cheaper than a full set of springs.
 
See whats left of the EAS system. if the compressor / valve block, tank, etc are there you have the option of getting it back on air for minimal outlay.
 
West Slope Rover said:
I'm a numpty (this I know because I've been told by others and through self examination) but I like my coil conversion.
Click to expand...
Yeah, but you run a Classic from What I can remember unless you changed in which case stop reading........................here!

The RRCL was designed originally to run on coils, and as such the chassis geometry, position of components, weight of vehicle etc etc was designed with coils in mind.....the advent of EAS on the earlier Classics was to test the system before launching it on the P38......it suited the classic well, but the P38 was designed from the beginning to have EAS....hence they could make the vehicle heavier with more toys, posher leather, bigger fuel tank.....etc etc etc....all of which the EAS will happily compensate for......
 
Saint.V8 said:
Yeah, but you run a Classic from What I can remember unless you changed in which case stop reading........................here!

The RRCL was designed originally to run on coils, and as such the chassis geometry, position of components, weight of vehicle etc etc was designed with coils in mind.....the advent of EAS on the earlier Classics was to test the system before launching it on the P38......it suited the classic well, but the P38 was designed from the beginning to have EAS....hence they could make the vehicle heavier with more toys, posher leather, bigger fuel tank.....etc etc etc....all of which the EAS will happily compensate for......
Click to expand...
My Rangie was the first model to run EAS and it's the whopper LSE. I've done 500+ mile trips with 5 people and two chocolate Labs in the car and the roof carrier maxed out in the middle of winter in the Rockies. That's pretty heavy and I've never felt it lacking.
I'm not arguing coils over EAS, as I've never driven a Range Rover on EAS. I'm just saying my coils work satisfactorily.
 
West Slope Rover said:
My Rangie was the first model to run EAS and it's the whopper LSE. I've done 500+ mile trips with 5 people and two chocolate Labs in the car and the roof carrier maxed out in the middle of winter in the Rockies. That's pretty heavy and I've never felt it lacking.
I'm not arguing coils over EAS, as I've never driven a Range Rover on EAS. I'm just saying my coils work satisfactorily.
Click to expand...
Ahhhhhh....didn't know/forgot yours is an LSE......Still a Classic chassis though...just been 'cut and shut' with a few extra inches.....
 
Saint.V8 said:
Ahhhhhh....didn't know/forgot yours is an LSE......Still a Classic chassis though...just been 'cut and shut' with a few extra inches.....
Click to expand...
Someday I'm going to have to see for myself the difference. My other RRC has always has been on coils. It drives like mush.
The LSE in on Bilstein HDs w/ Bilstein dampers, so maybe that's why it works.
 
West Slope Rover said:
Someday I'm going to have to see for myself the difference. My other RRC has always has been on coils. It drives like mush.
The LSE in on Bilstein HDs w/ Bilstein dampers, so maybe that's why it works.
Click to expand...
Yes the Classic coils were very soft, this was to give better articulation and smoother ride off road...and also to help maintain all wheel contact on undulating terrain.
 
I worked on early classic when they had just come out. They had horrendous handling on bumpy twisty roads at speed.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

O
03 L322 EAS ECU Can bus fault / ABS temp system deactivation
Replies
1
Views
592
oldradiotech
O
A
Help D3 Suspension
Replies
3
Views
493
Andrew bibby
A
J
L322 suspension fault light
Replies
8
Views
901
kermit_rr
kermit_rr
rover75lover
l 322 air suspension problems
Replies
4
Views
1K
Datatek
Datatek
J
D1 suspension - improve ride quality?
Replies
9
Views
953
Jalfrezi
J
Back
Top