P38A Steering intermediate shaft...

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.
BAE were very proud of saying that Jaguar was their first all metric A/C when in fact most of the fasteners on is were Unified nuts and bolts. Just converted to metric measurement on the drawings. It's amazing how many 4.8 mm Etc bolts there were holding the thing together. :D:D
Made us giggle in the office!! Needed that for a Monday of mundane.... :D:D:D
 
9.5 mm is 3/8" so they will be 3/8" UNC threads on yours.

Correct, 10 points to Wammers. I've just been in to my Tighten-Up, my local fasteners supplier, and according to their thread guage they're 3/8 UNC. They supplied me with 12.9 HT replacements (I have no idea what that means but they said it was the best). Land Rover originals are about £2.80 each, mine were 50p with nice washers thrown in for free. I also got some new cap head set screws (thank you boys) to replace the original rocker cover screws. I didn't really have a thin enough socket to get cleanly on them, so I'm replacing with Allen caps.
 
Correct, 10 points to Wammers. I've just been in to my Tighten-Up, my local fasteners supplier, and according to their thread guage they're 3/8 UNC. They supplied me with 12.9 HT replacements (I have no idea what that means but they said it was the best). Land Rover originals are about £2.80 each, mine were 50p with nice washers thrown in for free. I also got some new cap head set screws (thank you boys) to replace the original rocker cover screws. I didn't really have a thin enough socket to get cleanly on them, so I'm replacing with Allen caps.

12.9 is good, assemble them with a little Copraslip on the threads.
 
12.9 is the tensile strength of the material.....
grades of HT bolts are 4.6, 8.8, 10.[something] and 12.9
8.8 bolts can handle 880MPa (N/mm2) of tensile force before failure

Didn't know that. Learnt something new again. Presumably the expansion characteristics aren't different enough to worry about anything cracking?
 
More tensile strength the 'harder' the material.....when something is 'hard' it is brittle....

Temperature cycling will harden a material further.....

The relationship between stress and strain is known as the Youngs Modulus, this ratio is also known as the Elastic Modulus....how resistant a material is to 'Plastic Deformation' i.e. how resistant it is to be permanently deformed....gone beyond its tensile strength and has transitioned the Yeild point of a material.

Hardness is a materials resistance deformation to an applied compressive force (scratch, indentation and rebound).

These two properties to together can determine the materials Toughness....the amount of energy the material can absorb before fracture.....

The higher the tensile strength of a material, the more brittle it becomes(harder)....the material is then normalised or annealed to reduce this brittle nature (hardness) and makes it tougher.....but a small amount of Tensile Strength is lost in this de-hardening process.

Normalising is done by heating a material to a certain temperature and held there for a period of time determined by material thickness (the A2 point seems to ring a bell) and then let to cool down at a normal (say room) temperature...this de-stresses the material by allowing the atoms to settle down......

A constant heating and cooling can lead to Case Hardening...this were the outer 'skin' of the material gets harder, but the core is still 'soft' The work piece will have some ductility due to its flexible core, but the outer 'case' is more brittle.

Now the boring bit is over.......back to your question....

In structural dynamics, the grade of bolt is critical for a given application, as a bolts tensile strength is used during pre-loading calculations to ensure the optimum mechanical fixing to prevent bolt creep, bolt elongation and failure.

In the context you guys are using the bolts...i.e. to hold the exhaust manifold on, you won't be tightening the bolt to a point it will fail due to the heat expansion effect, as there will be more than enough tensile strength left in the bolt to take up this additional amount of tensile stress.

As a for instance an 8.8 M10 bolt (3/*" is 9.5mm) is recommended to torque to 56.3Nm.......the RAVE torque value for manifold bolts is 55Nm....so an 8.8 is a perfect fitment.

Yours are grade 12.9 and this is good for 92Nm......and if you tighten to 55Nm...there is plenty of elongation/expansion/tensile strength available for any heating or hardness effects.

Bored yet????? :D:D:D:D:D
 
Not bored yet and some rings bells from A levels somewhere in the dim and distant past.

Was more worried about the fact we have 2 different materials (aluminium block and steel bolts) that each expand differently when heated. If the chemical composition of the bolts is different then the bolt might expand more than expected and crack the block or less than expected and become loose over time. If the bolts are merely heat treated to the required hardness then it probably won't be an issue. Given where these bolts sit you'd hope they were a reasonable grade of carbon steel with some chromium or similar bunged in for good measure - although given the state of some of them I wonder how much they got away with. Actually, that's a little unfair, the manifold bolts themselves came out reasonable easily. It was the heat shield bolts and the studs connecting the downpipe to the manifold that were farcical.
 
The Ali head will expand quicker than the steel bolts, and the expansion co-efficient between the different grades will be negligible....it is the amount of carbon that primarily determines the grade/tensile strength.

The only issue is dissimilar metal corrosion, but it is a dry environment for the most part and as such, the chance of a liquid getting in and acting as an electrolyte is slim.....
 
Back
Top