Balbas
Active Member
- Posts
- 173
- Location
- Newton Abbot, Devon
viscous is better imo unless your deep wading
Why?
Not trying to be an arse, just interested in your rationale.
viscous is better imo unless your deep wading
Why?
Not trying to be an arse, just interested in your rationale.
less thermal shock
Oh really? Back when I had a series 2 (almost 20 years ago now) kenlowes were all the rage. Why are they considered 'not good' nowadays? If they're moving air though the rad core, then surely they're doing the biz? Especially if the TD5 cooling system is suitable for crossing desserts and the like?
As a partial aside, I drove a 300tdi powered 110 around Kuwait and Iraq for a bit and it never once missed a beat. I had absolute confidence in that wagon even in near 60 degree centigrade heat. So I know the standard cooling systems are well up to the job and probably vastly over specified for the uk.
well you know the answer then, so you try it and do it, then put the result up here and ley us all know, but you bought the vehicle with out one, not us, so why no fan??? maybe they forgot to put it back on, maybe it's been up to it's windscreen in mud n water? you asked for peoples opinion and JM told you his, his is good enough for me!
Not just TD5s but applicable to virtually all Tdi with intercoolers.
You need the viscous fan to draw ambient through the intercooler and cool the intake temps, this is double edged, higher intake temps = higher combustion chamber temps, leading to hotter exhaust gasses, hotter exhaust gasses tend to reduce life span of turbos, head gaskets and life of the oil in the engine as the higher temps break it down faster.
Welcome To LandyZone, the Land Rover Forums!
Here at LandyZone we have plenty of very knowledgable members so if you have any questions about your Land Rover or just want to connect with other Landy owners, you're in the right place.
Registering is free and easy just click here, we hope to see you on the forums soon!