- Posts
- 33,600
- Location
- North Shropshire
Until they get let down by owners that can't or won't keep them in the manner they expectAll land rovers are great cars.
Until they get let down by owners that can't or won't keep them in the manner they expectAll land rovers are great cars.
Double post
The main bearing shells turn in the housing due to the omission the the anti rotation tab cutting off the oil to the bearing.I think so, some sleeve thingymybob that spun round a bit and blocked the oil way.
i think i saw a youtube video where someone replaced the shells for ones with tabs.. before there was a problem, can't remember which channel it was onThe main bearing shells turn in the housing due to the omission the the anti rotation tab cutting off the oil to the bearing.
It poses the question as to why there weren't tabs in the first place? For most of the engine design history there's always been tabs on the shells for this very reasoni think i saw a youtube video where someone replaced the shells for ones with tabs.. before there was a problem, can't remember which channel it was on
Designed on a computer by someone without a clueIt poses the question as to why there weren't tabs in the first place? For most of the engine design history there's always been tabs on the shells for this very reason
I think so, some sleeve thingymybob that spun round a bit and blocked the oil way.
The main bearing shells turn in the housing due to the omission the the anti rotation tab cutting off the oil to the bearing.
This is actually unbelieveable, no tabs? of course they are going to spin at some point, who designed these engines?It poses the question as to why there weren't tabs in the first place? For most of the engine design history there's always been tabs on the shells for this very reason
Any particular pros/cons for either model?
I'm not into "spannering" myself and need the most hassle free running experience as possible for the aforementioned health reasons.
Getting back on topic.
I think we are still on topic............just.
i.e. Con's of the TDV6 =1 big one, Pro's = still waiting for them.....I mean there must be some if you don't include to £600+ tax bracket.
Don't think the OP has said how deep their pockets are yet
Personally I would love an L405 but would struggle to justify a 4.4 V8, just a shame about the TDV6 version.
If its got stop start i think the tax is cheaper ,(year dependent) not sure,, but might be aloud in lez zones as well ,...I think we are still on topic............just.
i.e. Con's of the TDV6 =1 big one, Pro's = still waiting for them.....I mean there must be some if you don't include to £600+ tax bracket.
Don't think the OP has said how deep their pockets are yet
Personally I would love an L405 but would struggle to justify a 4.4 V8, just a shame about the TDV6 version.
University educated engineers that use CAD and have absolutely no practical experience, they can't even design tumble dryers that don't catch fire these days.This is actually unbelieveable, no tabs? of course they are going to spin at some point, who designed these engines?
engineer? more like a retard.
Welcome To LandyZone, the Land Rover Forums!
Here at LandyZone we have plenty of very knowledgable members so if you have any questions about your Land Rover or just want to connect with other Landy owners, you're in the right place.
Registering is free and easy just click here, we hope to see you on the forums soon!