Mahindra Rally

Igundwane typed:

> This venue and event is a closed event for Mahindra vehicles only ------
> Hmmmmmmmm I wonder why ?

Probably for the same reason there are closed to club Land Rover meetings,
or Jeep meetings etc ..

--
Paul ...

(8(|) ... Homer Rocks

"Igundwane" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> This venue and event is a closed event for Mahindra vehicles only ------
> Hmmmmmmmm I wonder why ? Dont want series landrovers and other older 4x4's
> showing you up then ??
>
> --
> Success is to go from failure to another, with no loss of enthusiasm. --
Sir
> Winston Churchill
>

Stupid ****wit.

What part of the phrase "National Mahindra Register Rally" don't you
understand?

Caz

"Caz" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:nQvDc.25$%c3.5@newsfe5-win...
>
> "Igundwane" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > This venue and event is a closed event for Mahindra vehicles only ------
> > Hmmmmmmmm I wonder why ? Dont want series landrovers and other older
4x4's
> > showing you up then ??
> >
> > --
> > Success is to go from failure to another, with no loss of enthusiasm. --
> Sir
> > Winston Churchill
> >
>
> Stupid ****wit.
>
> What part of the phrase "National Mahindra Register Rally" don't you
> understand?
>
> Caz
>
>

Do these go together ??

> Stupid ****wit.
>
Mahindra>

"Hirsty's" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:WwYDc.176$d%[email protected]...
> Do these go together ??
>
> > Stupid ****wit.
> >
> Mahindra>
>
>

Not unless you are one yourself!

What has really amazed me is the number of "experts" that frequent these
newsgroups. All the posters have, or so it would seem by their in depth
knowledge on how "crap" Mahindras are, been past owners. It would appear
that comparisons between what is effectively a 1950's designed car with a
1970's designed engine, are being made with the latest eurocrap or Japanese
4x4's. which baulk at the slightest sign of a puddle. If comparisons are
being made with a LR series or a SJ, well I've owned a 1972 SIII diesel and
a 1984 SJ, which were both slow, noisy, uncomfortable, wandered all over the
road, brakes - eventually and has all the creature comforts of a cow shed.
Off road, they were great, but there again, a Mahindra is certainly their
equal - we are talking bog standard here with MT tyres.

Do Landies and SJs get slated? Well not very often. They each have their
place and their followers. Lighten up people. To each their own. If you
don't like Mahindras then fine, but don't slag something off that you have
no personal experience of.

Mahindraman

Who cares, everyone to his own.

Only reason I commented was surprise at the expletive due to some harmless
leg pulling.


"Mahindra" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:KwcEc.48$m14.1@newsfe4-gui...
>
> "Hirsty's" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:WwYDc.176$d%[email protected]...
> > Do these go together ??
> >
> > > Stupid ****wit.
> > >
> > Mahindra>
> >
> >
>
> Not unless you are one yourself!
>
> What has really amazed me is the number of "experts" that frequent these
> newsgroups. All the posters have, or so it would seem by their in depth
> knowledge on how "crap" Mahindras are, been past owners. It would appear
> that comparisons between what is effectively a 1950's designed car with a
> 1970's designed engine, are being made with the latest eurocrap or
Japanese
> 4x4's. which baulk at the slightest sign of a puddle. If comparisons are
> being made with a LR series or a SJ, well I've owned a 1972 SIII diesel
and
> a 1984 SJ, which were both slow, noisy, uncomfortable, wandered all over
the
> road, brakes - eventually and has all the creature comforts of a cow shed.
> Off road, they were great, but there again, a Mahindra is certainly their
> equal - we are talking bog standard here with MT tyres.
>
> Do Landies and SJs get slated? Well not very often. They each have their
> place and their followers. Lighten up people. To each their own. If you
> don't like Mahindras then fine, but don't slag something off that you have
> no personal experience of.
>
> Mahindraman
>
>

"Hirsty's" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> Who cares, everyone to his own.

Precisely!
>
> Only reason I commented was surprise at the expletive due to some harmless
> leg pulling.

Which did not come from me, but the harmless leg pulling comment in question
was so stupid that I have to agree with the retort.


Mahindraman

Typical Mahindra then, thank god for the normal LR fraternity
"Mahindra" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:b4pEc.1152$W_2.790@newsfe4-gui...
>
> "Hirsty's" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
> > Who cares, everyone to his own.
>
> Precisely!
> >
> > Only reason I commented was surprise at the expletive due to some
harmless
> > leg pulling.
>
> Which did not come from me, but the harmless leg pulling comment in
question
> was so stupid that I have to agree with the retort.
>
>
> Mahindraman
>
>

"Hirsty's" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:HYtEc.581$iN2.478@newsfe2-win...
> Typical Mahindra then, thank god for the normal LR fraternity

??????????

If normal means that a simple four word phrase cannot be understood, then
I'm glad I'm not normal :O)

Mahindraman

Ah ! confirmation. Ta !
"Mahindra" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:ZxwEc.20$Ln6.13@newsfe4-gui...
>
> "Hirsty's" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:HYtEc.581$iN2.478@newsfe2-win...
> > Typical Mahindra then, thank god for the normal LR fraternity
>
> ??????????
>
> If normal means that a simple four word phrase cannot be understood, then
> I'm glad I'm not normal :O)
>
> Mahindraman
>
>

"Hirsty's" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:BnBEc.505$LK1.490@newsfe6-win...
> Ah ! confirmation. Ta !


You're welcome :O)

Mahindraman