The problem with this country is that folk always look for the Politically correct line. Calling a Japanese vehicle isn't racist in the way you want it to mean. If a Japanese national signed up on here and was called a slitty then that is different and would be racist.
So, is calling a Freelander a gaylander homophobic? Banter is part and parcel of normal life, unfortunately the thought police seem to be everywhere. If you want a politically correct landy forum then I would suggest the LRO site or Landrovernet. However, the banter on there has largely been sanitised which makes things very boring. Good debate come from seeing all sides of an arguement and sometimes it is necessary to agree to disagree.
I agree with you that political correctness is one of the scourges of this country. I hate it. I work with lots of people from 'minorities' who hate political correctness too.
An example is an openly gay bloke I work with. He drives a Mazda MX5. He doesn't mind in the slightest me calling it a hairdresser's car, gay car etc. He knows it's that sort of car, and he's well aware he's gay. I'm pretty sure he wouldn't find the term gaylander offensive in the slightest either, any more than I would mind a bit of banter that I was gay for driving one.
I think 'Slitty' is a bit different. It's a comment on a basic physical trait of a whole race, which I think most people of oriental decent would reasonably find offensive.
I'm all for free speech, but I think there's room for a bit of respect as well. Many japanese car forums are trying to stop the use of the term 'Jap' for cars as Japanese people find it offensive. Maybe a bit over the top, but it's not much more effort to say Japanese. I definitely don't think it's too much effort not to refer to things as 'Slitty'
I agree it's great to see all sides of an argument, but maybe part of that is accepting that some terms aren't just 'non-pc', but actually offensive, and this idea shouldn't be dismissed out of hand.
There's nobody likes banter more than me, but if you want to vilify me for suggesting that certain things might just cross the line, then fair enough.