- Posts
- 44,966
- Location
- Hornchurch
the two are unrelated.However i can understand the mantality of taking it while you can get it.Thats exactly my point :doh: doesn't cost the insurance company so the people you are fraudulently taking money from are the folk who end up paying more for their premiums......for example.....ME
I take you have no objections to MPs claiming as much as they think they can get away with on their expenses.....?