How about "Pretender"?Simple give it another name instead of "Defender".
True. I seriously think Landrover missed a marketing trick in a rush to get an Defender out. Because the original version since 1983 from late series forerunner to ninety One tens and improvements zenith. We have been sold a very expensive bauble that cannot be repaired in the field so to speak. Notice how they advertise the vehicle built for breastfeeding comfort. Surprised they didn't design by placing a newborn cocooned (sorry if I insulted our African audience) inside. Defender is meant to be rugged get a few knocks complained about and above all fixable by Joe public.How about "Pretender"?
Yep. It was aimed at posh posers, not real people with real needs of a durable utility vehicle.It's not even another league, it's a completely different vehicle aimed at a different market
It's like calling Freelander as a defender when it clearly not. If you're putting that much effort to modernise then make a complete 270. In other words dump the pattern. The success of the G wagon is a solid design built. Defender reached it's limit of use and should have stopped. Bit left field here remember the Harrier jump jet the most iconic functionality aircraft. Yet we've spent gazillions on two vessels waiting for an American version of successor to Harriers yet the same American military use the original.It's not even another league, it's a completely different vehicle aimed at a different market
Welcome To LandyZone, the Land Rover Forums!
Here at LandyZone we have plenty of very knowledgable members so if you have any questions about your Land Rover or just want to connect with other Landy owners, you're in the right place.
Registering is free and easy just click here, we hope to see you on the forums soon!