- Posts
- 34,062
- Location
- North Shropshire
True, but once you get back into your safety shell it's easy to forgetI think car drivers would be far more aware of what's happening on the road if they had ever riden a motorbike.
True, but once you get back into your safety shell it's easy to forgetI think car drivers would be far more aware of what's happening on the road if they had ever riden a motorbike.
Couldn't like this enough.I think car drivers would be far more aware of what's happening on the road if they had ever riden a motorbike.
True, but once you get back into your safety shell it's easy to forget
In general yes, I'm just saying it's easy to fall back into car driver modeAre you not more aware of bikes even in your car?
I will often be in a queue of cars and see bike/s hopping in my mirrors, I will always move to the kerb side so they can pass.
J
He wouldn't have been in distress if he wasn't an idiot.IANAL and all those other disclaimers but....
Can you challenge a Section 59 at the time and require them to show evidence that you meet the criteria, especially if you are assisting a motorist in distress? If you refuse to accept the warning can you force their hand to try a different tack? If you are confident your actions are innocent then if they try to issue one then surely is harassment ie
(1)A person must not pursue a course of conduct—
(a)which amounts to harassment of another, and
(b)which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other.
The fact that a Section 59 cannot be appealed after issue will be known to the officer(s) which would fit the definition of harassment
Would he have been in that dress.. if he weren't in dis one?He wouldn't have been in distress if he wasn't an idiot.
Try it and let us know how it goesIANAL and all those other disclaimers but....
Can you challenge a Section 59 at the time and require them to show evidence that you meet the criteria, especially if you are assisting a motorist in distress? If you refuse to accept the warning can you force their hand to try a different tack? If you are confident your actions are innocent then if they try to issue one then surely is harassment ie
(1)A person must not pursue a course of conduct—
(a)which amounts to harassment of another, and
(b)which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other.
The fact that a Section 59 cannot be appealed after issue will be known to the officer(s) which would fit the definition of harassment
This would not be harassment. A police force would not record or investigate it as such. However, it could be dealt with as a complaint. That in itself would be a separate matter to the section 59 but the issuing of the warning would be looked into as part of the complaint.IANAL and all those other disclaimers but....
Can you challenge a Section 59 at the time and require them to show evidence that you meet the criteria, especially if you are assisting a motorist in distress? If you refuse to accept the warning can you force their hand to try a different tack? If you are confident your actions are innocent then if they try to issue one then surely is harassment ie
(1)A person must not pursue a course of conduct—
(a)which amounts to harassment of another, and
(b)which he knows or ought to know amounts to harassment of the other.
The fact that a Section 59 cannot be appealed after issue will be known to the officer(s) which would fit the definition of harassment
Oh, oh, please sir… can we issue section 59’s to EVERYannoyance.. that doesnt have a legal definition so open to interpretation
you can be driving anywhere legally, on or off road and someone could get annoyed by you.. green cars annoy me
Watch who you're calling a MuppetOh, oh, please sir… can we issue section 59’s to EVERY MUPPET who sits hogging lane 2 or 3 or 4?
And every Prius. (See above)
EVERYMUPPETTWUNT who sits hogging lane 2 or 3 or 4?
Watch who you're calling a Muppet
You would be amazed to see just how many folk do the opposite when they see a bike legally lane splitting in very slow or stationary trafficAre you not more aware of bikes even in your car?
I will often be in a queue of cars and see bike/s hopping in my mirrors, I will always move to the kerb side so they can pass.
J
No I wouldn't. I ride bikes too.You would be amazed to see just how many folk do the opposite when they see a bike legally lane splitting in very slow or stationary traffic
Question, how would the new owner of the the car know if it had a S59 against it?? I’d like to think there would be a way of finding that out?? HPI check wouldn’t bring that up would it??And it stays with the car if sold .
J
Question, how would the new owner of the the car know if it had a S59 against it?? I’d like to think there would be a way of finding that out?? HPI check wouldn’t bring that up would it??
Hmmmm, I’ve had it since June , we have had many enjoyable days out on the official green lanes using glass and TW2 lanes, i don’t plan of driving it like a total bell, or planning on going off on stuff you shouldn’t, like to think the previous owner didn’t..I have no idea if its checkable, I don't have to deal with it living here.
Are you thinking of buying a new car?
Why not pop into your local police station and ask? it would help if it was a transparent system . I also don't believe it should be carried over to the new owner.
J
Question, how would the new owner of the the car know if it had a S59 against it?? I’d like to think there would be a way of finding that out?? HPI check wouldn’t bring that up would it??
Don't do anything you shouldn't do then you will be alright.Question, how would the new owner of the the car know if it had a S59 against it?? I’d like to think there would be a way of finding that out?? HPI check wouldn’t bring that up would it??
Welcome To LandyZone, the Land Rover Forums!
Here at LandyZone we have plenty of very knowledgable members so if you have any questions about your Land Rover or just want to connect with other Landy owners, you're in the right place.
Registering is free and easy just click here, we hope to see you on the forums soon!