Bemble
Well-Known Member
- Posts
- 652
- Location
- Lancashire
Sounds like it was designed by a committee that never met 
Gearbox fault, special programmes off
- Thread starter Shawser1203
- Start date
This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.
Datatek
Well-Known Member
- Posts
- 44,885
- Location
- Near Poitiers SW France
LOLSounds like it was designed by a committee that never met
Shawser1203
Member
- Posts
- 26
- Location
- Aberdeen
So if the resistance test comes back within those parameters, then the solenoid motor is OK?
Datatek
Well-Known Member
- Posts
- 44,885
- Location
- Near Poitiers SW France
Maybe, check to see if you get a resistance reading from either pin to the case.
Shawser1203
Member
- Posts
- 26
- Location
- Aberdeen
Electrics are not my thing, not got the patience. So please excuse the questions and my ignorance. Thanks for all the info guys.
Bemble
Well-Known Member
- Posts
- 652
- Location
- Lancashire
According to Land Rover, P0666 is either a short in the solenoid/wiring or a faulty transfer box controller. If the solenoid & its wiring check out okay, you’re left with the ECU. Good luck.
Phil
Phil
Shawser1203
Member
- Posts
- 26
- Location
- Aberdeen
Phil will a new ecu be a plug and play? Or will it need to be programmed into my car
Bemble
Well-Known Member
- Posts
- 652
- Location
- Lancashire
Sorry, I don’t know the answer to that. I’m sure someone else will know? Even if you don’t need it coding to the vehicle, though, the replacement ECU would still have to be calibrated to your transfer box using a capable diagnostics kit, to take account of the degree of clutch wear for the actuator mechanism.
Phil
Phil
Shawser1203
Member
- Posts
- 26
- Location
- Aberdeen
As a short circuit in the solenoid wiring is given as a possible cause for both these error codes, it might be worth checking this out first, including testing the resistance of the solenoid itself.
A resistance check between terminals 9 & 12 at the (largest) ECU connector (when disconnected, obviously) should give a result between 0.2Ω and 10.0Ω.
In case you thought you might remove it, note that the solenoid must be energised for it to be removed/replaced otherwise you won’t be able to engage/disengage it from the shift fork.
https://www.rangerovers.net/threads/magna-steyr-dd295-transfer-box-teardown.41233/#post-349450
Phil
Shawser1203
Member
- Posts
- 26
- Location
- Aberdeen
As a short circuit in the solenoid wiring is given as a possible cause for both these error codes, it might be worth checking this out first, including testing the resistance of the solenoid itself.
A resistance check between terminals 9 & 12 at the (largest) ECU connector (when disconnected, obviously) should give a result between 0.2Ω and 10.0Ω.
In case you thought you might remove it, note that the solenoid must be energised for it to be removed/replaced otherwise you won’t be able to engage/disengage it from the shift fork.
https://www.rangerovers.net/threads/magna-steyr-dd295-transfer-box-teardown.41233/#post-349450
Phil
As a short circuit in the solenoid wiring is given as a possible cause for both these error codes, it might be worth checking this out first, including testing the resistance of the solenoid itself.
A resistance check between terminals 9 & 12 at the (largest) ECU connector (when disconnected, obviously) should give a result between 0.2Ω and 10.0Ω.
In case you thought you might remove it, note that the solenoid must be energised for it to be removed/replaced otherwise you won’t be able to engage/disengage it from the shift fork.
https://www.rangerovers.net/threads/magna-steyr-dd295-transfer-box-teardown.41233/#post-349450
Phil
Shawser1203
Member
- Posts
- 26
- Location
- Aberdeen
Datatek
Well-Known Member
- Posts
- 44,885
- Location
- Near Poitiers SW France
That reading is 166 Ohms which is not correct, should be between 0.2 & 10 ohms according to Phil.
Shawser1203
Member
- Posts
- 26
- Location
- Aberdeen
I'm not clued up with this sort of stuff. Not sure if it was correct pins I was touching. I'm sure it was.
Datatek
Well-Known Member
- Posts
- 44,885
- Location
- Near Poitiers SW France
You need to be very sure.
Shawser1203
Member
- Posts
- 26
- Location
- Aberdeen
The reading is 0.166 k ohms
Shawser1203
Member
- Posts
- 26
- Location
- Aberdeen
When Phil said pins 9 and 12 on ecu, I presume he meant the transfer case control module
Datatek
Well-Known Member
- Posts
- 44,885
- Location
- Near Poitiers SW France
Yes,, the k denotes 1000, so 166 ohms with the k removed.
Datatek
Well-Known Member
- Posts
- 44,885
- Location
- Near Poitiers SW France
No, the chart Phil published clearly states "Solenoid resistance"
Shawser1203
Member
- Posts
- 26
- Location
- Aberdeen
Shawser1203
Member
- Posts
- 26
- Location
- Aberdeen
