Genus Coffea
Member
- Posts
- 87
- Location
- Berkshire
Is an
err479 ,which is turbo diesel block ,turbo feed and drain are blocked for n/a uses, you need the later main bearing set too ,but its the same block apart from those , one block now covers all 5 bearing 4 cylinder petrols and dieselsIs anyone aware of a part no for a engine block for this model, speculating on whether to build a "new" engine from the floor up.
Ok thanks for that. I noticed another block casting (part no err2639) is also available from turner engineering. In your expert eyes would that be preferable even though the block you mentioned does cover all the 5 bearing 4cylinder petrels and diesels.err479 ,which is turbo diesel block ,turbo feed and drain are blocked for n/a uses, you need the later main bearing set too ,but its the same block apart from those , one block now covers all 5 bearing 4 cylinder petrols and diesels
What do you mean by bungs? Also in reference to your first post when you say turbo feed and drain are blocked for n/a uses, or am I just being dense.its the same block but with bungs in already, lr switched to the one block in the 90s
Can a turbo do 70mph?the bungs for the turbo feed and drain
depends what you want ,if 2.5 n/a has enough power for your needs id go n/a
Can a turbo do 70mph?
If faced with the choice of a brand new n/a or turbo which would you choose?Yes, and a bit more. But it needs to be a good one, doing that in a 200k example is unlikely to end well!
If everything is about right, 2.5 na should get near 70 anyway.
If faced with the choice of a brand new n/a or turbo which would you choose?
If faced with the choice of a brand new n/a or turbo which would you choose?
Why a 2.5 petrol? Btw my main objective in building a new 2.5 petrol-diesel n/a-turbo would be to get the most power possible without a tdi if that clarifies the choice.Also, if given the choice of a brand new 2.5 petrol, I might go for that instead! Subject to limitations above ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^.
Why a 2.5 petrol? Btw my main objective in building a new 2.5 petrol-diesel n/a-turbo would be to get the most power possible without a tdi if that clarifies the choice.
What mpg is realistic on the turbo?As mentioned above, depends what you want to do with the end vehicle. The N/A will get close to 30mpg, 35 on a long 40-50 mpg run, and is easy to maintain/long lived. Not relaxing near motorway speeds though. A petrol is going to be more powerful and a bit nicer to drive , and easy to up the power - uprated head from turner etc. - but 20mpg is hard to achieve.
What mpg is realistic on the turbo?
Welcome To LandyZone, the Land Rover Forums!
Here at LandyZone we have plenty of very knowledgable members so if you have any questions about your Land Rover or just want to connect with other Landy owners, you're in the right place.
Registering is free and easy just click here, we hope to see you on the forums soon!