Classic Automatic Gearbox for RR Classic

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.

roge

Member
Posts
10
Location
Ireland
Hi I have a 1974 Range Rover Classic, which has a 2.5TDI engine, with Chysler 3 speed automaticgearbox. I got a 3.5 V8 EFI engine from a Rover SD1, to go into it.
This is my first venture with a RR. I was wondering what is the best automatic gearbox that I can put into the RR with the 3.5 V8 EFI engine ?
 
Hi I have a 1974 Range Rover Classic, which has a 2.5TDI engine, with Chysler 3 speed automaticgearbox. I got a 3.5 V8 EFI engine from a Rover SD1, to go into it.
This is my first venture with a RR. I was wondering what is the best automatic gearbox that I can put into the RR with the 3.5 V8 EFI engine ?

The ZF HP22 that would have been mated to the engine from the factory?
I believe the earlier transmission tunnels were wider to accommodate the physical size of the 3sp. The floor pan was later ('85?) standardised to accept either the ZF or a manual 'box. I'm assuming the V8 blocks are the same, doubtless others will be along with technical advice.
 
The 3.5 v8 is from a rover sd1 and has a 3 speed automatic 2 wheel drive gearbox on it, as far as I can tell. The 1974 classic originally had a 3.5 but someone had changed it out for a 2.5 tdi before I got it.
Is the later ZF 4HP24 automatic gearbox an option for the 3.5 V8 efi too ?
 
The SD1 will have the Borg Warner 65 auto..

The 3spd Chrysler Torqueflite was fitted to the early 80s and late 70s 2/4 door 3.5..

It was a good box, but sucked all the power out of the carb'd 3.5

The EFI 1985+ RRC had the mechanical ZF4hp22 the ZF4hp24 was fitted to the 4,6 P38
 
The ZF HP22 that would have been mated to the engine from the factory?
I believe the earlier transmission tunnels were wider to accommodate the physical size of the 3sp. The floor pan was later ('85?) standardised to accept either the ZF or a manual 'box. I'm assuming the V8 blocks are the same, doubtless others will be along with technical advice.
The ZF HP22 that would have been mated to the engine from the factory?
I believe the earlier transmission tunnels were wider to accommodate the physical size of the 3sp. The floor pan was later ('85?) standardised to accept either the ZF or a manual 'box. I'm assuming the V8 blocks are the same, doubtless others will be along with technical advice.
Yes the top of the transmission tunnel does look like it was badly patched on.. Alot of screws and bolts all over the place really..
 
Thanks for that. Can the ZF4HP24 auto be fitted to the 3.5 V8 efi ?
The ZF4HP24 is electronically controlled, mechanically it will fit but sorting the required sensor inputs for the ECU would be a challenge. The early HP22 was mechanically controlled, later becoming the HP22e with electronic control.
 
The SD1 will have the Borg Warner 65 auto..
The 3spd Chrysler Torqueflite was fitted to the early 80s and late 70s 2/4 door 3.5.. It was a good box, but sucked all the power out of the carb'd 3.5
The EFI 1985+ RRC had the mechanical ZF4hp22 the ZF4hp24 was fitted to the 4,6 P38

Chrysler 'box also fitted to the US Army's Hummvee, good solid 'box but, as you say, a power-sapper.
I believe Ashcrofts can re-build a 4hp22 with hp24 internals.
 
I checked the transfer box - serial no. 28D. It is LT230 type T, ratio 1.222, used on RR classic 86 onwards and disco 1. Hopefully it will mate with ZF4HP24 auto gearbox..
 
Ok. Is there much difference, performance wise between the 22 box and the 24 box ? I've read the 24 box is stronger.
 
Or if you'd like a vehicle that is faster, more fun and has potential to use less fuel. Look at fitting a 5 speed manual. ;)
 
Back
Top