1999 vs 2001 Jeep Cherokee

This site contains affiliate links for which LandyZone may be compensated if you make a purchase.
F

For sale

Guest
I am in the market for a new car, and I have been looking at a 1999
Jeep Cherokee (2WD, 4 door) and 2001 Jeep Cherokee Sport (2WD, 2
door). Both have approximately the same specs (25K miles, 6 cyl.,
Automatic, ~$10.5K). I've read a number of complaints and reviews
about the poor quality in brakes/rotors for Jeeps, and I was wondering
if 2001 models (or 2000 models) were any more reliable than the 1999
model (given the 2000 recall for the front rotors). Can anybody
comment (via email or post) as to which would be the better buy (i.e.
is there much difference in terms of reliability and quality between
the 1999, 2000, and 2001 model years)? I'd really like to avoid a
situation where I have to buy a new set of rotors ever year or so on a
car that only costs $10K. Thanks for the help.
 
For sale wrote:
> I am in the market for a new car, and I have been looking at a 1999
> Jeep Cherokee (2WD, 4 door) and 2001 Jeep Cherokee Sport (2WD, 2
> door). Both have approximately the same specs (25K miles, 6 cyl.,
> Automatic, ~$10.5K).

I would recommend getting the one with the bigger engine if possible
and 4WD. This is because nobody wants a 2WD Jeep when it comes time
to sell it. Also, anything with 4WD on it, reguardless of age, is worth
a solid thousand dollars more than the 2WD version - even if it is
20 years old. Lastly - there is the safety and useability - the 4WD
is better in snow, mud, gravel roads, and the like.

My friend's father - 2WD truck. Took two months to sell. My friend's
4WD aging Bronco. 2 days to sell. Sold for $300 more than he was asking
due to a buyer bidding war.

Most yuppies don't take them off-road, so they are usually in very
good condition as well.(transfer case isn't all torn up)

Also, get the better trim line - for the same reasons. A Limited
with nothing on it sells for more when you get rid of it than a
sport with everything on it due mostly to the nameplate.

 

"For sale" <[email protected]> wrote in message
news:[email protected]...
> I am in the market for a new car, and I have been looking at a 1999
> Jeep Cherokee (2WD, 4 door) and 2001 Jeep Cherokee Sport (2WD, 2
> door). Both have approximately the same specs (25K miles, 6 cyl.,
> Automatic, ~$10.5K). I've read a number of complaints and reviews
> about the poor quality in brakes/rotors for Jeeps, and I was wondering
> if 2001 models (or 2000 models) were any more reliable than the 1999
> model (given the 2000 recall for the front rotors). Can anybody
> comment (via email or post) as to which would be the better buy (i.e.
> is there much difference in terms of reliability and quality between
> the 1999, 2000, and 2001 model years)? I'd really like to avoid a
> situation where I have to buy a new set of rotors ever year or so on a
> car that only costs $10K. Thanks for the help.

2WD JEEP? That's an oxymoron...


 
Rotors are a problem on the 2001s as well. I have one. You can replace
the rotors with aftermarket cast and eliminate the problem you are
talking about. I would not replace them with the same composite rotors.

For sale wrote:
> I am in the market for a new car, and I have been looking at a 1999
> Jeep Cherokee (2WD, 4 door) and 2001 Jeep Cherokee Sport (2WD, 2
> door). Both have approximately the same specs (25K miles, 6 cyl.,
> Automatic, ~$10.5K). I've read a number of complaints and reviews
> about the poor quality in brakes/rotors for Jeeps, and I was wondering
> if 2001 models (or 2000 models) were any more reliable than the 1999
> model (given the 2000 recall for the front rotors). Can anybody
> comment (via email or post) as to which would be the better buy (i.e.
> is there much difference in terms of reliability and quality between
> the 1999, 2000, and 2001 model years)? I'd really like to avoid a
> situation where I have to buy a new set of rotors ever year or so on a
> car that only costs $10K. Thanks for the help.


--
___________________________________________________________
tw
03 TJ Rubicon
01 XJ Sport

There is a very fine line between "hobby" and "mental illness."
-- Dave Barry

http://www.jeepn.org/members/html/twaldron.html
http://www.7slotgrille.com/jeepers/tj/twaldron/index.html
(Please remove the OBVIOUS to reply by email)
___________________________________________________________

 
Dan J.S. wrote:
> "For sale" <[email protected]> wrote in message
> news:[email protected]...
>> I am in the market for a new car, and I have been looking at a 1999
>> Jeep Cherokee (2WD, 4 door) and 2001 Jeep Cherokee Sport (2WD, 2
>> door). Both have approximately the same specs (25K miles, 6 cyl.,
>> Automatic, ~$10.5K). I've read a number of complaints and reviews
>> about the poor quality in brakes/rotors for Jeeps, and I was
>> wondering if 2001 models (or 2000 models) were any more reliable
>> than the 1999 model (given the 2000 recall for the front rotors).
>> Can anybody comment (via email or post) as to which would be the
>> better buy (i.e. is there much difference in terms of reliability
>> and quality between the 1999, 2000, and 2001 model years)? I'd
>> really like to avoid a situation where I have to buy a new set of
>> rotors ever year or so on a car that only costs $10K. Thanks for
>> the help.
>
> 2WD JEEP? That's an oxymoron...

Forgive my ignorance, but what is the point of a 2WD jeep?

--
Julian
---------
= Pretentious Sig required =


 
Thomas W. wrote:
> Transportation.
>
Oh I see, rather in the same way a unicycle is!

--
Julian
---------
= Pretentious Sig required =


 
Exit wrote:
> Thomas W. wrote:
>
>>Transportation.
>>
>
> Oh I see, rather in the same way a unicycle is!

As you see, nobody wants a 2WD Jeep. :) Get the 4WD and watch it
depreciate much slower.

Oh - you just might find you LIKE going down gravel and dirt roads :)

 
the wj are the ones with the oto issue not the xj get the xj

For sale wrote:

> I am in the market for a new car, and I have been looking at a 1999
> Jeep Cherokee (2WD, 4 door) and 2001 Jeep Cherokee Sport (2WD, 2
> door). Both have approximately the same specs (25K miles, 6 cyl.,
> Automatic, ~$10.5K). I've read a number of complaints and reviews
> about the poor quality in brakes/rotors for Jeeps, and I was wondering
> if 2001 models (or 2000 models) were any more reliable than the 1999
> model (given the 2000 recall for the front rotors). Can anybody
> comment (via email or post) as to which would be the better buy (i.e.
> is there much difference in terms of reliability and quality between
> the 1999, 2000, and 2001 model years)? I'd really like to avoid a
> situation where I have to buy a new set of rotors ever year or so on a
> car that only costs $10K. Thanks for the help.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Discodevon
Jeep Cherokee 2.7 crd 2002
Replies
9
Views
1K
Firebobby1
Firebobby1
M
My Freelander Passed with flying colours
Replies
4
Views
564
Atomician
Atomician
S
Defender 90 TD5 Low miles
Replies
17
Views
2K
steveyorks
S
M
Pump to the steering box pipe
Replies
4
Views
982
mma59
M
S
Defenders Vs Insurers tomfoolery
Replies
1
Views
4K
lightning
lightning
Back
Top