According to DELL, there is one RAM module soldered in, was supposed to be 256K and an expansion slot free when I bought it. It arrived with 128K plus 128K in the expansion slot. What I would like to do is replace the 128K soldered in module with a 256K and put a 256K in the expansion slot.
Had it 10 years, only use it for the P38, but some more memory would speed it up a bit. I can source the memory no problem.
Not wanting to sound pedantic, but it won't be in K, it'll be in MB. My old 1988 Amiga 500 had 512KB of memory and that's been extinct for a decade.
Admittedly I've never come into contact with an Inspiron 2600, but I have dismantled many other models of Dell laptop and in my 10 years as an engineer I've never come across a soldered memory module. In every case they've clipped in just the same as they do in the expansion slot, except it's on top of the mainboard, under the keyboard, usually leaving the expansion slot free for upgrades - heaven only knows why they didn't do that in your case. Dell eh?
If you're inclined to, follow the service manual, strip it down to the internal module and take a look - I'm willing to bet it's just as removeable as the one in the expansion slot - if not, you've taught me something new - I'm always happy to learn!
Anything more than XP? Vista is a disaster, 7 is Vista with
some of the bugs fixed. I won't be downgrading to Vista or 7 anytime soon with all the stupid time wasting messages the inability to run my software, the reluctance to talk to other systems on my network etc etc. Thats why you get a free XP pro disc with Vista Pro or 7 Pro.
Not my words, they are from a professor of computer science at a major university when asked why they wer not "upgrading"
I can see you have a very strong opinion when it comes to Vista & 7 and I can understand why as in many cases they can seem cumbersome and slow. If you have old or basic hardware then XP will have a definite advantage; Its relatively lightweight core means the operating system can theoretically run with only 64MB of RAM, leaving plenty of resources left over for your apps.
I've never been keen on Vista, but it has improved with service packs. I like Windows 7 as it has a more stripped out feel and is less bogged down with GPU-intensive prettiness. That said, if you have high-end requirements, such as using a powerful PC to run heavy-duty applications, Vista and Windows 7 come into their own. They're better optimised for multicore CPUs, and Windows 7 in particular includes a number of tweaks to make the best of the latest hardware.
I manage large-scale rollouts of Windows 7 in enterprise environments which use the latest multicore technology, so it fits the bill perfectly and with up-to-date software, compatability is rarely an issue. Having said that, I personally keep one XP laptop knocking around plus a VMware Virtual Machine running XP to allow me to use legacy applications which simply won't work with the later OS's.
So I can totally see where you're coming from, but I think it's all a matter of perspective. They're all good in their own right, in the right environment, with the appropriate hardware.