Iphone camera doesn't do it justice, sounds much nicer in person
Would love an aston V8 to dump in it or a Daimler 12
The sign of a good V8 if it's rocking! Hopefully mine will once set up
looking at those shafts i'll bet they're not designed to run a 2-2.5" droop on a permanent basis, they look too short to survive the stresses that'll be imparted ... i'd have thought to give them a chance of surviving the uj's would need to be at 45* to each other (i'm not an engineer so i'm only guessing on the angle) or are you thinking of turning them into double cardon ??
cv's would definitely outlast those but that would be chucking another problem into the mix
A little scrape and you whining like a gurl Just got a concern about them axles and your big tyres they just may snap or rip out the drive flange as its a 10 spline
looking at those shafts i'll bet they're not designed to run a 2-2.5" droop on a permanent basis, they look too short to survive the stresses that'll be imparted ... i'd have thought to give them a chance of surviving the uj's would need to be at 45* to each other (i'm not an engineer so i'm only guessing on the angle) or are you thinking of turning them into double cardon ??
cv's would definitely outlast those but that would be chucking another problem into the mix
I was a little worried about the front one but given the jag axle is designed to take far more torque than the LR one it should hopefully be ok even with the 35's
Worse case is I just upgrade to 24 spline hubs off a later jag as the props are all interchangeable
weight, mass,and centrifugal force of 35 is way more than what jag tryes generate, by a 2-3 times
ujs are correctly phased , if both flanges prop fits between arent parallel then props ujs are sset out of phase
i've no argument with your statement (i'm not sure i understand it) but i was considering the permanent angle/droop where when the uj's are both positioned thus "X" on each quarter revolution there'll be quite high stresses placed on the uj needle races
whereas if one is "X" and the other is "+" then i feel it may reduce the stress
the length of those shafts and the amount of droop is where i see the problem, longer shafts would reduce the stress but of course we're limited by the axle width
of course i may be talking out of my arse and if so i hold my hands up
I think your on about the distance out of alignment with regard to the axis of both flanges. (parallel, but not on same axis)i've no argument with your statement (i'm not sure i understand it) but i was considering the permanent angle/droop where when the uj's are both positioned thus "X" on each quarter revolution there'll be quite high stresses placed on the uj needle races
whereas if one is "X" and the other is "+" then i feel it may reduce the stress
the length of those shafts and the amount of droop is where i see the problem, longer shafts would reduce the stress but of course we're limited by the axle width
of course i may be talking out of my arse and if so i hold my hands up
this is assuming the hubs get attached parallel to the diffujs obviously have a limit of angle they can cope with ,but if you look at front prop on a landy you will see diff flange and t/box flange arent in parallel hence fronts are out of phase if they were as they would be as rear drive shafts then they would be set in phase , phasing is not angle prop runs through but the angle of flanges in relation to each other