"shiden_kai" <violet_lightening_modified@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:EYsxd.545693$nl.113849@pd7tw3no...
> Whitelightning wrote:
>
>> Or pre fill the oil filter before putting it on.

>
> Right....I'd like to see you pre-fill the oil
> filter on an Ecotec 4 cylinder engine. And
> many other engines....good luck!
>
> Ian


Bingo.

The majority of 4-bangers I've worked on have the filter mounted parallel to
the ground, making it just a wee bit difficult <read:impossible> to pre-oil
the filter before install.

Doc


>
>



 
In article <oghcs0p8159ptfhdtha53q6s85aipvd0n4@4ax.com>,
Lawrence Glickman <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote:

> Name a SINGLE technical error I've made this week, or any week.
> Name ONE.


As of yesterday (12-19), the "Help diagnose starting problem"
thread.

No starter motor action and there you were, blathering about
Throttle Position Sensors, vacuum leaks, MAF sensors, fuel
pressure under load and your tinker toy scan tool.

That's five technical errors in ONE post!

Any other questions?
 
"Spiderman" <spiderman@spiderman.com> wrote in message
news:p9adnbemSex9617cRVn-gg@comcast.com...
>
> ""Doc"" <noway@nope.com> wrote in message
> news:p8KdneRX7K7c1V7cRVn-qg@adelphia.com...
> >
> > "Spiderman" <spiderman@spiderman.com> wrote in message
> > news:RZadnUZrRPB1217cRVn-gQ@comcast.com...
> >
> >>> How far (in inches) over the full mark is it?
> >>>
> >>> Doc
> >>
> >> I didn't measure it but its past the FULL mark...but not so far as

to
> >> ride up the stem of the dipstick.

> >
> > Ok, there is about 2 FEET of dipstick above the full mark.

GUESTIMATE how
> > far over the full mark the oil level is. 1/2" is a lot different

than 2".
> >
> > Doc

>
>
> Sorry hehe....it's about 1/2" over the full mark. What's the

diagnosis, Doc?
>
>


1/2" won't hurt you at all. That equates to about 1/2 quart. I always
put in 5 quarts with filter change in the wifes 4.3. Look at it this
way. The sump holds 3 quarts without touching the crank (the crank is
actually 1" or so in the oil before the pump starts working). Now when
you actually start the engine the oil pump does it's job. On the 4X4
with the small filter the filter holds 1/2 quart, the lines and cooler
hold another 1/2 quart. Now add the oil passages in the engine up and
that takes another 1.5 quarts. What does that leave in the sump? Correct
, 2 quarts. If it takes 3 quarts to get to the crank you still have 1
quart to play with.

Now if you go nuts and dump 6-7 quarts in you will have problems.





-----------== Posted via Newsfeed.Com - Uncensored Usenet News ==----------
http://www.newsfeed.com The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----= Over 100,000 Newsgroups - Unlimited Fast Downloads - 19 Servers =-----
 
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 12:50:25 GMT, aarcuda69062
<nonelson@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>In article <oghcs0p8159ptfhdtha53q6s85aipvd0n4@4ax.com>,
> Lawrence Glickman <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> Name a SINGLE technical error I've made this week, or any week.
>> Name ONE.

>
>As of yesterday (12-19), the "Help diagnose starting problem"
>thread.
>
>No starter motor action and there you were, blathering about
>Throttle Position Sensors, vacuum leaks, MAF sensors, fuel
>pressure under load and your tinker toy scan tool.
>
>That's five technical errors in ONE post!
>
>Any other questions?


Yes just one.
WHY DO YOU EXIST?

You have never, to my knowledge, contributed -anything- to the n/g
except negative criticism.

If that was my car, I would take a jump kit and connect it across the
starter contacts and see if it spins. That's just me. Takes 1
minute.

The problem as I understood it, was that the OP's car was *cutting
out* while driving. Different, eh? Not what you said, what HE said.

I reiterate, you are useless as a source of information. In fact,
worse than useless. You are not a contributor, you are a troll.

PLONK

Lg

 
Has anybody checked the oil yet to see if coolant getting in there, Im
wooried because he said the oil was light brown. Scott

 


Lawrence Glickman wrote:

>On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 21:22:27 -0600, "Bob" <bob@n0spam.net> wrote:
>
>
>
>>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>news:0nfcs0di481hq47hea7md04bb69avn1a70@4ax.com...
>>
>>
>>>On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 02:43:33 GMT, "shiden_kai"
>>><violet_lightening_modified@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>Ken Weitzel wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Is the gasket on the filter meant to be re-used ?
>>>>>
>>>>>And even if so, starting with an empty filter means another
>>>>>few seconds of engine running time before oil pressure,
>>>>>while the filter fills, right?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>This is now an official "Lawrence Glickman" ****ed up
>>>>thread.
>>>>
>>>>Ian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Suck my dick Ian.
>>>I didn't bring this *leaker* into this thread.
>>>Go **** yourself with a broomstick.
>>>I knew there was a reason I had you killfiled.
>>>
>>>PLONK
>>>
>>>Lg
>>>
>>>
>>>

>>Glickman, you've just got to be one of the dumbest assholes on UseNet. If
>>you actually had Ian killfiled you wouldn't have even seen the post that you
>>just replied to. I'd have killfiled you long ago except that you're posts
>>have some entertainment value.
>>
>>

>
>Name a SINGLE technical error I've made this week, or any week.
>Name ONE.
>
>
>
>>Just when I think you couldn't possibly say
>>anything dumber you prove me wrong.
>>
>>

>
>Well bobbie, you live in a world of stupidity, so it doesn't surprise
>me that everything you see looks stupid to you.
>
>Now Name a SINGLE technical eror I've made, and the entire Usenet is
>WAITING.....................................................................................
>
>

Don't now how to use spell check?

>Lg
>
>
>
>
>> Bob
>>
>>
>>

>
>
>


 
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 01:01:51 GMT, WhyAsk <vwincent@mt.net> wrote:

>
>
>Lawrence Glickman wrote:
>
>>On Sun, 19 Dec 2004 21:22:27 -0600, "Bob" <bob@n0spam.net> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message
>>>news:0nfcs0di481hq47hea7md04bb69avn1a70@4ax.com...
>>>
>>>
>>>>On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 02:43:33 GMT, "shiden_kai"
>>>><violet_lightening_modified@hotmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>Ken Weitzel wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>Is the gasket on the filter meant to be re-used ?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>And even if so, starting with an empty filter means another
>>>>>>few seconds of engine running time before oil pressure,
>>>>>>while the filter fills, right?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>This is now an official "Lawrence Glickman" ****ed up
>>>>>thread.
>>>>>
>>>>>Ian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>Suck my dick Ian.
>>>>I didn't bring this *leaker* into this thread.
>>>>Go **** yourself with a broomstick.
>>>>I knew there was a reason I had you killfiled.
>>>>
>>>>PLONK
>>>>
>>>>Lg
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>Glickman, you've just got to be one of the dumbest assholes on UseNet. If
>>>you actually had Ian killfiled you wouldn't have even seen the post that you
>>>just replied to. I'd have killfiled you long ago except that you're posts
>>>have some entertainment value.
>>>
>>>

>>
>>Name a SINGLE technical error I've made this week, or any week.
>>Name ONE.
>>
>>
>>
>>>Just when I think you couldn't possibly say
>>>anything dumber you prove me wrong.
>>>
>>>

>>
>>Well bobbie, you live in a world of stupidity, so it doesn't surprise
>>me that everything you see looks stupid to you.
>>
>>Now Name a SINGLE technical eror I've made, and the entire Usenet is
>>WAITING.....................................................................................
>>
>>

>Don't now how to use spell check?
>
>>Lg
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>> Bob


This is always the Last Resort of the Troll.
If you can win an argument with logic, go after typographical errors.
Now even you have to admit, that is about a Lame as it gets.
You can do better if you try.

Lg

 
In article <ob4es0lrofmt915p26o46c9gtm5dm4ltb3@4ax.com>,
Lawrence Glickman <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote:

> >Any other questions?

>
> Yes just one.
> WHY DO YOU EXIST?


Because nothing has been able to kill me yet.
(not for a lack of opportunity though)

> You have never, to my knowledge, contributed -anything- to the n/g
> except negative criticism.


Key words being "to my [your] knowledge."

> If that was my car, I would take a jump kit and connect it across the
> starter contacts and see if it spins. That's just me. Takes 1
> minute.


Really? What happened to your thoughts of connecting your scan
tool as posted previously?
Seriously, how the hell can you misinterpret a statement like;
>>> When they turn the starter switch, nothing
>>> happens. You can't even hear the solenoid clicking or the
>>> starter trying to engage. No sound at all.




> The problem as I understood it, was that the OP's car was *cutting
> out* while driving. Different, eh? Not what you said, what HE said.


What "he" said is directly above, it has >>> in front of it. Put
your finger underneath each word and sound them out if you have
to, take notes and reference them as often as you need.

> I reiterate, you are useless as a source of information. In fact,
> worse than useless. You are not a contributor, you are a troll.


Gee Lawrence, you -did- ask the question, I merely provided
examples that satisfied your query.

> PLONK


Fine by me...
 

""Doc"" <noway@nope.com> wrote in message
news:hKSdnVpii-EL9FvcRVn-iQ@adelphia.com...
>
> "shiden_kai" <violet_lightening_modified@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:EYsxd.545693$nl.113849@pd7tw3no...
> > Whitelightning wrote:
> >
> >> Or pre fill the oil filter before putting it on.

> >
> > Right....I'd like to see you pre-fill the oil
> > filter on an Ecotec 4 cylinder engine. And
> > many other engines....good luck!
> >
> > Ian

>
> Bingo.
>
> The majority of 4-bangers I've worked on have the filter mounted parallel

to
> the ground, making it just a wee bit difficult <read:impossible> to

pre-oil
> the filter before install.
>
> Doc
>


You might not be able to completely fill it on all cars, but even if you can
get 1/4 qt in a 1/2 qt filter you have lessened the amount of time with no
oil pressure. I remember a few cars were your hands were completely tied
over the years, like the Chrysler slant six with the filter mounted upside
down, or more than a few toyotas were the filter was mounted angled down, or
any engine that used a cartridge instead of a spin on filter.
Whitelightning


 
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 02:35:05 GMT, aarcuda69062
<nonelson@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

>In article <ob4es0lrofmt915p26o46c9gtm5dm4ltb3@4ax.com>,
> Lawrence Glickman <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>> >Any other questions?

>>
>> Yes just one.
>> WHY DO YOU EXIST?

>
>Because nothing has been able to kill me yet.
>(not for a lack of opportunity though)
>
>> You have never, to my knowledge, contributed -anything- to the n/g
>> except negative criticism.

>
>Key words being "to my [your] knowledge."
>
>> If that was my car, I would take a jump kit and connect it across the
>> starter contacts and see if it spins. That's just me. Takes 1
>> minute.

>
>Really? What happened to your thoughts of connecting your scan
>tool as posted previously?
>Seriously, how the hell can you misinterpret a statement like;
>>>> When they turn the starter switch, nothing
>>>> happens. You can't even hear the solenoid clicking or the
>>>> starter trying to engage. No sound at all.

>
>
>
>> The problem as I understood it, was that the OP's car was *cutting
>> out* while driving. Different, eh? Not what you said, what HE said.

>
>What "he" said is directly above, it has >>> in front of it. Put
>your finger underneath each word and sound them out if you have
>to, take notes and reference them as often as you need.
>
>> I reiterate, you are useless as a source of information. In fact,
>> worse than useless. You are not a contributor, you are a troll.

>
>Gee Lawrence, you -did- ask the question, I merely provided
>examples that satisfied your query.
>
>> PLONK

>
>Fine by me...


I never -really- plonk anybody. I just say that for some reason;
knee-jerk reaction.

I think you're an OK guy even if you don't like me. Makes no
difference one way or another, but you're OK by me. So is about
everybody else.

Lg

 

"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:4u4fs0tim11q597vtbug30f205e7e41ter@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 02:35:05 GMT, aarcuda69062
> <nonelson@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>
>>In article <ob4es0lrofmt915p26o46c9gtm5dm4ltb3@4ax.com>,
>> Lawrence Glickman <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote:
>>
>>> >Any other questions?
>>>
>>> Yes just one.
>>> WHY DO YOU EXIST?

>>
>>Because nothing has been able to kill me yet.
>>(not for a lack of opportunity though)
>>
>>> You have never, to my knowledge, contributed -anything- to the n/g
>>> except negative criticism.

>>
>>Key words being "to my [your] knowledge."
>>
>>> If that was my car, I would take a jump kit and connect it across the
>>> starter contacts and see if it spins. That's just me. Takes 1
>>> minute.

>>
>>Really? What happened to your thoughts of connecting your scan
>>tool as posted previously?
>>Seriously, how the hell can you misinterpret a statement like;
>>>>> When they turn the starter switch, nothing
>>>>> happens. You can't even hear the solenoid clicking or the
>>>>> starter trying to engage. No sound at all.

>>
>>
>>
>>> The problem as I understood it, was that the OP's car was *cutting
>>> out* while driving. Different, eh? Not what you said, what HE said.

>>
>>What "he" said is directly above, it has >>> in front of it. Put
>>your finger underneath each word and sound them out if you have
>>to, take notes and reference them as often as you need.
>>
>>> I reiterate, you are useless as a source of information. In fact,
>>> worse than useless. You are not a contributor, you are a troll.

>>
>>Gee Lawrence, you -did- ask the question, I merely provided
>>examples that satisfied your query.
>>
>>> PLONK

>>
>>Fine by me...

>
> I never -really- plonk anybody. I just say that for some reason;
> knee-jerk reaction.
>
> I think you're an OK guy even if you don't like me. Makes no
> difference one way or another, but you're OK by me. So is about
> everybody else.
>
> Lg


Geez Larry, you should really make sure and stay on your medication. It
works wonders.
Bob
>



 
On Mon, 20 Dec 2004 21:21:22 -0600, "Bob" <bob@n0spam.net> wrote:

>
>"Lawrence Glickman" <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote in message
>news:4u4fs0tim11q597vtbug30f205e7e41ter@4ax.com...
>> On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 02:35:05 GMT, aarcuda69062
>> <nonelson@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
>>
>>>In article <ob4es0lrofmt915p26o46c9gtm5dm4ltb3@4ax.com>,
>>> Lawrence Glickman <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote:
>>>
>>>> >Any other questions?
>>>>
>>>> Yes just one.
>>>> WHY DO YOU EXIST?
>>>
>>>Because nothing has been able to kill me yet.
>>>(not for a lack of opportunity though)
>>>
>>>> You have never, to my knowledge, contributed -anything- to the n/g
>>>> except negative criticism.
>>>
>>>Key words being "to my [your] knowledge."
>>>
>>>> If that was my car, I would take a jump kit and connect it across the
>>>> starter contacts and see if it spins. That's just me. Takes 1
>>>> minute.
>>>
>>>Really? What happened to your thoughts of connecting your scan
>>>tool as posted previously?
>>>Seriously, how the hell can you misinterpret a statement like;
>>>>>> When they turn the starter switch, nothing
>>>>>> happens. You can't even hear the solenoid clicking or the
>>>>>> starter trying to engage. No sound at all.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> The problem as I understood it, was that the OP's car was *cutting
>>>> out* while driving. Different, eh? Not what you said, what HE said.
>>>
>>>What "he" said is directly above, it has >>> in front of it. Put
>>>your finger underneath each word and sound them out if you have
>>>to, take notes and reference them as often as you need.
>>>
>>>> I reiterate, you are useless as a source of information. In fact,
>>>> worse than useless. You are not a contributor, you are a troll.
>>>
>>>Gee Lawrence, you -did- ask the question, I merely provided
>>>examples that satisfied your query.
>>>
>>>> PLONK
>>>
>>>Fine by me...

>>
>> I never -really- plonk anybody. I just say that for some reason;
>> knee-jerk reaction.
>>
>> I think you're an OK guy even if you don't like me. Makes no
>> difference one way or another, but you're OK by me. So is about
>> everybody else.
>>
>> Lg

>
>Geez Larry, you should really make sure and stay on your medication. It
>works wonders.
> Bob


How nice of you to be concerned about my Health. What a wonderful
gesture of warm Humanity. I feel renewed.

BTW, I hope you enjoy your Holiday Season and find some happiness in
it. This can be a tough time of year for a lot of people, being mixed
in with *relatives* they can't stand ;-\

Lg

 


Lawrence Glickman wrote:
<snip>

>>>Now Name a SINGLE technical eror I've made, and the entire Usenet is
>>>WAITING.....................................................................................
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>

>>Don't now how to use spell check?
>>
>>
>>
>>>Lg
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Bob
>>>>
>>>>

>
>This is always the Last Resort of the Troll.
>If you can win an argument with logic, go after typographical errors.
>Now even you have to admit, that is about a Lame as it gets.
>You can do better if you try.
>
>Lg
>
>

You asked, I answered.
You can do better too.


 
aarcuda69062 proclaimed:

> In article <oghcs0p8159ptfhdtha53q6s85aipvd0n4@4ax.com>,
> Lawrence Glickman <Lawrence_Glickman@comcast.net> wrote:
>
>
>>Name a SINGLE technical error I've made this week, or any week.
>>Name ONE.

>
>
> As of yesterday (12-19), the "Help diagnose starting problem"
> thread.
>
> No starter motor action and there you were, blathering about
> Throttle Position Sensors, vacuum leaks, MAF sensors, fuel
> pressure under load and your tinker toy scan tool.
>
> That's five technical errors in ONE post!
>
> Any other questions?


Well, shyeagh dude, the poor misguided fact-challenged OP told
you to name a "SINGLE" error...
 

Similar threads