On Mon, 07 Jul 2003 00:29:47 GMT, "Exit" <exit@nomore.com> wrote:

>>> Democrats are socialists?
>>>
>>> To be a socialist (like Tony Blair or Karl Marx :)) you need to
>>> believe in:
>>>
>>> State ownership of big business.
>>>
>>> A command economy.
>>>
>>> Redistribution of wealth.
>>>
>>> That the struggle between the proletariat and bourgeois is a politcal
>>> struggle.
>>>
>>> State provision of services.
>>>
>>> It still looks to me as though you have two right wing parties
>>> neither of whom would know socialism if it hit them in the face! ;-)
>>
>> Perhaps you need to look a bit closer. I'm not familiar with the
>> phrase "command economy", but everything else you mentioned is dead on
>> what the Democrats want.
>
>Really? Which industries have the democrats nationalised recently?

I said "want", not "accomplished". They're working hard at getting
health care socialized on both the national and in some cases, state
levels. They've failed pretty badly so far - but not necessarily for
lack of trying. Or lying.

>If they were socialists a national health service would be top of their
>list, but they don't ssem to have provided one yet.

See above.

>A command economy is one run by the state like the old soviet union.

Thanks.


 



"Paul Jensen" <pjensen@gnt.net> wrote in message
news:vghj68biiijic8@corp.supernews.com...
> > > Tell me bright eyes how many more republicans are on the welfare roles
> due
> > > to lack of education, then democrats.
> > > It was a democrat that designed the palm beach ballot in 2000 and it
was
> > > democrats who could not figure out what it said, a great testimonial
to
> > > democratic intellectual abilities.
> >
> >
> > You're wrong on all counts as usual. However, this is not the proper
forum
> for
> > testicularly deprived chickenhawks like you to pound their chests.....
>
> How is he wrong? You mean it was Republicans complaining because they
voted
> for the wrong candidate? You made the accusation he was wrong - now back
it
> up!
>

But that's like trying to get facts from a Liberal....


 
>A command economy is one run by the state like the old soviet union.

How does that work?
Like: "I command the Frakenzy to be of worth equal to half a Euro"? or "The
stocks will rise now!"?


 

"scrape at mindspring dot com" <scrape@mindspring.com> wrote in message
news:naahgv08ghs9ltd1qdp2d2t9u4jj21cetr@4ax.com...
> On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 22:23:42 GMT, "Exit" <exit@nomore.com> wrote:
>
> >scrape at mindspring dot com wrote:
> >> On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 20:40:07 GMT, "Exit" <exit@nomore.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Forgive my lack of knowledge of US political parties as I am an
> >>> Englishman - I take it the democrats are the very right wing party
> >>> and the republicans are the even more right wing party?
> >>
> >> Nope. You've got it wrong. The Democrats are the socialists and the
> >> Republicans are the liberals.
> >
> >Democrats are socialists?
> >
> >To be a socialist (like Tony Blair or Karl Marx :)) you need to believe in:
> >
> >State ownership of big business.
> >
> >A command economy.
> >
> >Redistribution of wealth.
> >
> >That the struggle between the proletariat and bourgeois is a politcal
> >struggle.
> >
> >State provision of services.
> >
> >It still looks to me as though you have two right wing parties neither of
> >whom would know socialism if it hit them in the face! ;-)
>
> Perhaps you need to look a bit closer. I'm not familiar with the
> phrase "command economy", but everything else you mentioned is dead on
> what the Democrats want.

bull****


 

"Paul Jensen" <pjensen@gnt.net> wrote in message news:vghj1gn00vaq98@corp.supernews.com...
> "Exit" <exit@nomore.com> wrote in message news:0f1Oa.76182$%L.60422@news-
> > Well we could stop providing free health care for everyone and then remove
> > the duty from petrol with the money we've saved.
> >
> > But my American friends pay more per onth for Healthcare than I do for
> > petrol, so I guess I'd be worse off! :)
>
> Most of us Americans get ourselves a skill or an education, then go out and
> get jobs and get our own health care

taken a look at the unemployment stats lately? I didn't think so.....


 

"Paul Jensen" <pjensen@gnt.net> wrote in message news:vghj68biiijic8@corp.supernews.com...
> > > Tell me bright eyes how many more republicans are on the welfare roles
> due
> > > to lack of education, then democrats.
> > > It was a democrat that designed the palm beach ballot in 2000 and it was
> > > democrats who could not figure out what it said, a great testimonial to
> > > democratic intellectual abilities.
> >
> >
> > You're wrong on all counts as usual. However, this is not the proper forum
> for
> > testicularly deprived chickenhawks like you to pound their chests.....
>
> How is he wrong? You mean it was Republicans complaining because they voted
> for the wrong candidate? You made the accusation he was wrong - now back it
> up!
>
>

Spend countless hours refuting inane bull**** statements to someone with a (tiny) closed
mind? I have a life; you should get one too....


 

"Paul Jensen" <pjensen@gnt.net> wrote in message news:vghj9jh6idjkea@corp.supernews.com...
>
> "John Hinckley" <Aiming@atBush.com> wrote in message
> news:RA1Oa.2163$7e.763@fed1read07...
>
> > you are wrong yet. investigate the designer of the ballot and you will see
> she was a
> > one-term Democrat; formerly a life-long Pubican and now an independent.
>
> No, you are wrong, since it was Democrats who were too stupid to figure out
> how to use a simple ballet.
>
>

You are not only wrong, you can't spell or you don't know a ballet from a ballot. Point
is, conehead, I am correct on my statement about the designer of the butterfly ballot. You
need (in addition to an education) some Beano.


 

"Papa Smurf" <fakeaddress@Iwantnospam.crap> wrote in message
news:af4Oa.4696$19.465@nwrdny03.gnilink.net...
>
>
>
> "Paul Jensen" <pjensen@gnt.net> wrote in message
> news:vghj68biiijic8@corp.supernews.com...
> > > > Tell me bright eyes how many more republicans are on the welfare roles
> > due
> > > > to lack of education, then democrats.
> > > > It was a democrat that designed the palm beach ballot in 2000 and it
> was
> > > > democrats who could not figure out what it said, a great testimonial
> to
> > > > democratic intellectual abilities.
> > >
> > >
> > > You're wrong on all counts as usual. However, this is not the proper
> forum
> > for
> > > testicularly deprived chickenhawks like you to pound their chests.....
> >
> > How is he wrong? You mean it was Republicans complaining because they
> voted
> > for the wrong candidate? You made the accusation he was wrong - now back
> it
> > up!
> >
>
> But that's like trying to get facts from a Liberal....
>
>

Oh yes and you are the Oracle of Karl Rovian bull****. Isn't it uncomfortable having your
head crammed up his ass?


 
Exit wrote:

> Jim Alder wrote:
>> "Exit" <exit@nomore.com> wrote in
>> news:38XNa.74918$%L.29112@news-lhr.blueyonder.co.uk:
>>
>>> Educated Republican wrote:
>>>> I love my V-10 sittin way up high. The power is unimagined
>>>> and I feel heroic singing to Lee Greenwood. I like to push
>>>> the guy ahead in the liberal econobox. Even more when I have
>>>> my headlights on blinding his mirrors! God made this country
>>>> great so we could have power on demand because its all about
>>>> us. God told Rush that only HE can change warming so my
>>>> little output don't matter. If the enviros ban big motors we
>>>> will be robbed of our power rights so write to your
>>>> repesentatives or just crush the next Subaru you see!
>>>>
>>>> Steve
>>>
>>> Is that what passes for educated these days? ;-)
>>
>> Nah. It's what passes for a liberal troll these days.
>
> Why is all this bollocks so political in the US?
>
> Petrol is $5 a gallon here in the UK and very few people care what you
> drive.
>

Unable to take responsibility for their own actions, most
americans feel it is necessary to compensate by sticking
their nose in everyone else's business. This tendency
to stick one's nose where it is totally unwanted is always
in direct proportion to the lack of self responsibility
on the part of the noser.


 
In article <Xns93B0889C350B3jimaldersssnetcom@216.168.3.44>,
jimalder@ssnet.com says...
> "Exit" <exit@nomore.com> wrote in
> news:38XNa.74918$%L.29112@news-lhr.blueyonder.co.uk:
>
> > Educated Republican wrote:
> >> I love my V-10 sittin way up high. The power is unimagined
> >> and I feel heroic singing to Lee Greenwood. I like to push
> >> the guy ahead in the liberal econobox. Even more when I have
> >> my headlights on blinding his mirrors! God made this country
> >> great so we could have power on demand because its all about
> >> us. God told Rush that only HE can change warming so my
> >> little output don't matter. If the enviros ban big motors we
> >> will be robbed of our power rights so write to your
> >> repesentatives or just crush the next Subaru you see!
> >>
> >> Steve
> >
> > Is that what passes for educated these days? ;-)
>
> Nah. It's what passes for a liberal troll these days.
>
>

No you get a 5% discount if you recite this at the Dodge dealership.
--
____________________
Remove "X" from email address to reply.
 

> >
> > "Paul Jensen" <pjensen@gnt.net> wrote in message
> > news:vghj68biiijic8@corp.supernews.com...
> > > > > Tell me bright eyes how many more republicans are on the welfare
roles
> > > due
> > > > > to lack of education, then democrats.
> > > > > It was a democrat that designed the palm beach ballot in 2000 and
it
> > was
> > > > > democrats who could not figure out what it said, a great
testimonial
> > to
> > > > > democratic intellectual abilities.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > You're wrong on all counts as usual. However, this is not the proper
> > forum
> > > for
> > > > testicularly deprived chickenhawks like you to pound their
chests.....
> > >
> > > How is he wrong? You mean it was Republicans complaining because they
> > voted
> > > for the wrong candidate? You made the accusation he was wrong - now
back
> > it
> > > up!
> > >
> >
> > But that's like trying to get facts from a Liberal....
> >
> >
>
> Oh yes and you are the Oracle of Karl Rovian bull****. Isn't it
uncomfortable having your
> head crammed up his ass?
>
I wouldn't know, I'm a conservative (look at this - I'm here one day and I'm
already arguing at a third grade level)


 
John Hinckley wrote:

> "scrape at mindspring dot com" <scrape@mindspring.com> wrote in message
> news:q32hgvgtp7pp0tj3drcit7h7jqfo9007qn@4ax.com...
>> On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 19:41:48 GMT, "Exit" <exit@nomore.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Why is all this bollocks so political in the US?
>>
>> Because, on one hand, you have a political party that has been
>> somewhat neutered in the last couple of years that basically believes
>> the way to salvation is to triple the tax on everything. And on the
>> other hand you have another political party that believes (to a
>> degree) that individual freedoms are more important than whatever
>> Boxer, Feinstein, Pelosi and Hillary (new Gang of Four?) have to say.
>>
>> >Petrol is $5 a gallon here in the UK and very few people care what you
>> >drive.
>>
>> That truly sucks. You ought to do something about it.
>>
>
> i love to watch morons rewrite history.
>
In order to rewrite it, it helps to have first read it.
And please don't call him a moron, they may be intellectually
challenged, but they do have some standards of behavior.


 


"John Hinckley" <Aiming@atBush.com> wrote in message
news:Vl4Oa.2198$7e.2064@fed1read07...
>
> "Paul Jensen" <pjensen@gnt.net> wrote in message
news:vghj1gn00vaq98@corp.supernews.com...
> > "Exit" <exit@nomore.com> wrote in message
news:0f1Oa.76182$%L.60422@news-
> > > Well we could stop providing free health care for everyone and then
remove
> > > the duty from petrol with the money we've saved.
> > >
> > > But my American friends pay more per onth for Healthcare than I do for
> > > petrol, so I guess I'd be worse off! :)
> >
> > Most of us Americans get ourselves a skill or an education, then go out
and
> > get jobs and get our own health care
>
> taken a look at the unemployment stats lately? I didn't think so.....

Yup, worse figure in 6 years. Oh my god, how bad it was in 97... Whatever
will we do. Judging by the indicators, I'll guess we'll have to wait a
couple of months.
And by we I mean the unemployeed. I've worked hard, been smart and planned
well, and can weather a little bump in the economy.


 

"Chris Phillipo" <Xcphillipo@ns.sympatico.ca> wrote in message
news:MPG.1972ac65a7332247989d74@news.eastlink.ca...
> In article <Xns93B0889C350B3jimaldersssnetcom@216.168.3.44>,
> jimalder@ssnet.com says...
> > "Exit" <exit@nomore.com> wrote in
> > news:38XNa.74918$%L.29112@news-lhr.blueyonder.co.uk:
> >
> > > Educated Republican wrote:
> > >> I love my V-10 sittin way up high. The power is unimagined
> > >> and I feel heroic singing to Lee Greenwood. I like to push
> > >> the guy ahead in the liberal econobox. Even more when I have
> > >> my headlights on blinding his mirrors! God made this country
> > >> great so we could have power on demand because its all about
> > >> us. God told Rush that only HE can change warming so my
> > >> little output don't matter. If the enviros ban big motors we
> > >> will be robbed of our power rights so write to your
> > >> repesentatives or just crush the next Subaru you see!
> > >>
> > >> Steve
> > >
> > > Is that what passes for educated these days? ;-)
> >
> > Nah. It's what passes for a liberal troll these days.
> >
> >
>
> No you get a 5% discount if you recite this at the Dodge dealership.


One thing about "sitting up high;" it's easier to spot the nearest Dodge Service
Department......


 

"Papa Smurf" <fakeaddress@Iwantnospam.crap> wrote in message
news:Fw4Oa.4744$19.1850@nwrdny03.gnilink.net...
>
> > >
> > > "Paul Jensen" <pjensen@gnt.net> wrote in message
> > > news:vghj68biiijic8@corp.supernews.com...
> > > > > > Tell me bright eyes how many more republicans are on the welfare
> roles
> > > > due
> > > > > > to lack of education, then democrats.
> > > > > > It was a democrat that designed the palm beach ballot in 2000 and
> it
> > > was
> > > > > > democrats who could not figure out what it said, a great
> testimonial
> > > to
> > > > > > democratic intellectual abilities.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > You're wrong on all counts as usual. However, this is not the proper
> > > forum
> > > > for
> > > > > testicularly deprived chickenhawks like you to pound their
> chests.....
> > > >
> > > > How is he wrong? You mean it was Republicans complaining because they
> > > voted
> > > > for the wrong candidate? You made the accusation he was wrong - now
> back
> > > it
> > > > up!
> > > >
> > >
> > > But that's like trying to get facts from a Liberal....
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Oh yes and you are the Oracle of Karl Rovian bull****. Isn't it
> uncomfortable having your
> > head crammed up his ass?
> >
> I wouldn't know, I'm a conservative (look at this - I'm here one day and I'm
> already arguing at a third grade level)
>

You didn't need to tell us you are a Pubican goose-stepper. It drips out of your
ill-informed flat earth posts


 

"Lon Stowell" <lon.stowell@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:xw4Oa.122337$R73.14919@sccrnsc04...
> John Hinckley wrote:
>
> > "scrape at mindspring dot com" <scrape@mindspring.com> wrote in message
> > news:q32hgvgtp7pp0tj3drcit7h7jqfo9007qn@4ax.com...
> >> On Sun, 06 Jul 2003 19:41:48 GMT, "Exit" <exit@nomore.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >Why is all this bollocks so political in the US?
> >>
> >> Because, on one hand, you have a political party that has been
> >> somewhat neutered in the last couple of years that basically believes
> >> the way to salvation is to triple the tax on everything. And on the
> >> other hand you have another political party that believes (to a
> >> degree) that individual freedoms are more important than whatever
> >> Boxer, Feinstein, Pelosi and Hillary (new Gang of Four?) have to say.
> >>
> >> >Petrol is $5 a gallon here in the UK and very few people care what you
> >> >drive.
> >>
> >> That truly sucks. You ought to do something about it.
> >>
> >
> > i love to watch morons rewrite history.
> >
> In order to rewrite it, it helps to have first read it.
> And please don't call him a moron, they may be intellectually
> challenged, but they do have some standards of behavior.

cretin, then?


 

"Papa Smurf" <fakeaddress@Iwantnospam.crap> wrote in message
news:rz4Oa.4757$19.1811@nwrdny03.gnilink.net...
>
>
> "John Hinckley" <Aiming@atBush.com> wrote in message
> news:Vl4Oa.2198$7e.2064@fed1read07...
> >
> > "Paul Jensen" <pjensen@gnt.net> wrote in message
> news:vghj1gn00vaq98@corp.supernews.com...
> > > "Exit" <exit@nomore.com> wrote in message
> news:0f1Oa.76182$%L.60422@news-
> > > > Well we could stop providing free health care for everyone and then
> remove
> > > > the duty from petrol with the money we've saved.
> > > >
> > > > But my American friends pay more per onth for Healthcare than I do for
> > > > petrol, so I guess I'd be worse off! :)
> > >
> > > Most of us Americans get ourselves a skill or an education, then go out
> and
> > > get jobs and get our own health care
> >
> > taken a look at the unemployment stats lately? I didn't think so.....
>
> Yup, worse figure in 6 years. Oh my god, how bad it was in 97... Whatever
> will we do. Judging by the indicators, I'll guess we'll have to wait a
> couple of months.
> And by we I mean the unemployeed. I've worked hard, been smart and planned
> well, and can weather a little bump in the economy.


Try ten years. But that would mean not watching Faux and doing a little reading. Sorry, I
know that's an alien term for you... Couple of months? There is nothing, no reason, to
assume that things will get any better in the foreseeable future. Of course Rushbo
probably knows more than leading economists. "Little bump?" Maybe on your head; what
happened to the budget surplus? Look at those deficits. Even RayGun and Bush 1 can't match
these. I am sure those 1.25 million people who have been out of work for over a year
thought they would be employed by now as well. Your dog-eat-dog laissez faire Pubican
attitude is typical of this third world nation we now inhabit.


 



"John Hinckley" <Aiming@atBush.com> wrote in message
news:WN4Oa.2216$7e.2154@fed1read07...
>
> "Papa Smurf" <fakeaddress@Iwantnospam.crap> wrote in message
> news:Fw4Oa.4744$19.1850@nwrdny03.gnilink.net...
> >
> > > >
> > > > "Paul Jensen" <pjensen@gnt.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:vghj68biiijic8@corp.supernews.com...
> > > > > > > Tell me bright eyes how many more republicans are on the
welfare
> > roles
> > > > > due
> > > > > > > to lack of education, then democrats.
> > > > > > > It was a democrat that designed the palm beach ballot in 2000
and
> > it
> > > > was
> > > > > > > democrats who could not figure out what it said, a great
> > testimonial
> > > > to
> > > > > > > democratic intellectual abilities.
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > You're wrong on all counts as usual. However, this is not the
proper
> > > > forum
> > > > > for
> > > > > > testicularly deprived chickenhawks like you to pound their
> > chests.....
> > > > >
> > > > > How is he wrong? You mean it was Republicans complaining because
they
> > > > voted
> > > > > for the wrong candidate? You made the accusation he was wrong -
now
> > back
> > > > it
> > > > > up!
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > But that's like trying to get facts from a Liberal....
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > Oh yes and you are the Oracle of Karl Rovian bull****. Isn't it
> > uncomfortable having your
> > > head crammed up his ass?
> > >
> > I wouldn't know, I'm a conservative (look at this - I'm here one day and
I'm
> > already arguing at a third grade level)
> >
>
> You didn't need to tell us you are a Pubican goose-stepper. It drips out
of your
> ill-informed flat earth posts

Not a republican, an agnostic fiscal conservative is as close to a workable
label as I've come up with. Personal responsibility is my watchword.


 

"Papa Smurf" <fakeaddress@Iwantnospam.crap> wrote in message
news:t45Oa.13892$Ha.514@nwrdny02.gnilink.net...
>
>
>
> "John Hinckley" <Aiming@atBush.com> wrote in message
> news:WN4Oa.2216$7e.2154@fed1read07...
> >
> > "Papa Smurf" <fakeaddress@Iwantnospam.crap> wrote in message
> > news:Fw4Oa.4744$19.1850@nwrdny03.gnilink.net...
> > >
> > > > >
> > > > > "Paul Jensen" <pjensen@gnt.net> wrote in message
> > > > > news:vghj68biiijic8@corp.supernews.com...
> > > > > > > > Tell me bright eyes how many more republicans are on the
> welfare
> > > roles
> > > > > > due
> > > > > > > > to lack of education, then democrats.
> > > > > > > > It was a democrat that designed the palm beach ballot in 2000
> and
> > > it
> > > > > was
> > > > > > > > democrats who could not figure out what it said, a great
> > > testimonial
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > democratic intellectual abilities.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > You're wrong on all counts as usual. However, this is not the
> proper
> > > > > forum
> > > > > > for
> > > > > > > testicularly deprived chickenhawks like you to pound their
> > > chests.....
> > > > > >
> > > > > > How is he wrong? You mean it was Republicans complaining because
> they
> > > > > voted
> > > > > > for the wrong candidate? You made the accusation he was wrong -
> now
> > > back
> > > > > it
> > > > > > up!
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > But that's like trying to get facts from a Liberal....
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Oh yes and you are the Oracle of Karl Rovian bull****. Isn't it
> > > uncomfortable having your
> > > > head crammed up his ass?
> > > >
> > > I wouldn't know, I'm a conservative (look at this - I'm here one day and
> I'm
> > > already arguing at a third grade level)
> > >
> >
> > You didn't need to tell us you are a Pubican goose-stepper. It drips out
> of your
> > ill-informed flat earth posts
>
> Not a republican, an agnostic fiscal conservative is as close to a workable
> label as I've come up with. Personal responsibility is my watchword.
>
>

well we're close on the agnostic part...that alone would get you drummed out of the
Pubican Party.... Personal responsibility? I have to go battle with two assholes Tuesday;
they did $6000 damage to my truck and won't accept responsibility for it.....


 

"John Hinckley" <Aiming@atBush.com> wrote in message
news:975Oa.2223$7e.173@fed1read07...
>
> "Papa Smurf" <fakeaddress@Iwantnospam.crap> wrote in message
> news:t45Oa.13892$Ha.514@nwrdny02.gnilink.net...
> >
> >
> >
> > "John Hinckley" <Aiming@atBush.com> wrote in message
> > news:WN4Oa.2216$7e.2154@fed1read07...
> > >
> > > "Papa Smurf" <fakeaddress@Iwantnospam.crap> wrote in message
> > > news:Fw4Oa.4744$19.1850@nwrdny03.gnilink.net...
> > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > "Paul Jensen" <pjensen@gnt.net> wrote in message
> > > > > > news:vghj68biiijic8@corp.supernews.com...
> > > > > > > > > Tell me bright eyes how many more republicans are on the
> > welfare
> > > > roles
> > > > > > > due
> > > > > > > > > to lack of education, then democrats.
> > > > > > > > > It was a democrat that designed the palm beach ballot in
2000
> > and
> > > > it
> > > > > > was
> > > > > > > > > democrats who could not figure out what it said, a great
> > > > testimonial
> > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > democratic intellectual abilities.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > You're wrong on all counts as usual. However, this is not
the
> > proper
> > > > > > forum
> > > > > > > for
> > > > > > > > testicularly deprived chickenhawks like you to pound their
> > > > chests.....
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > How is he wrong? You mean it was Republicans complaining
because
> > they
> > > > > > voted
> > > > > > > for the wrong candidate? You made the accusation he was
wrong -
> > now
> > > > back
> > > > > > it
> > > > > > > up!
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > But that's like trying to get facts from a Liberal....
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Oh yes and you are the Oracle of Karl Rovian bull****. Isn't it
> > > > uncomfortable having your
> > > > > head crammed up his ass?
> > > > >
> > > > I wouldn't know, I'm a conservative (look at this - I'm here one day
and
> > I'm
> > > > already arguing at a third grade level)
> > > >
> > >
> > > You didn't need to tell us you are a Pubican goose-stepper. It drips
out
> > of your
> > > ill-informed flat earth posts
> >
> > Not a republican, an agnostic fiscal conservative is as close to a
workable
> > label as I've come up with. Personal responsibility is my watchword.
> >
> >
>
> well we're close on the agnostic part...that alone would get you drummed
out of the
> Pubican Party.... Personal responsibility? I have to go battle with two
assholes Tuesday;
> they did $6000 damage to my truck and won't accept responsibility for
it.....

There's a lot of that around here (Mass). It no longer seems to be about
doing what's right, but what one can get away with. Best we can do is stay
true to our ethical code.


 
You must log in or register to reply here.