How about something that doesn't tug on the heartstrings so much and attract so much funding ...how about children's projects that aren't as visible and for who the money would make a bigger impact. Only reason I suggest...our local children's hospice had a donation of £20k from fundraising from our local radio and yet I know that the young carers organisation didn't get funding from comic relief this year and I know that the group young minds which is a helpline for kids with mental health problems has had to cut its days its available. The local youth drug group has had its funding cut also
Personaly I agree with Fanny...lets choose something where our money makes a difference and they tend to be your less emotive and less pretty charities.
How about something that doesn't tug on the heartstrings so much and attract so much funding ...how about children's projects that aren't as visible and for who the money would make a bigger impact. Only reason I suggest...our local children's hospice had a donation of £20k from fundraising from our local radio and yet I know that the young carers organisation didn't get funding from comic relief this year and I know that the group young minds which is a helpline for kids with mental health problems has had to cut its days its available. The local youth drug group has had its funding cut also
Personaly I agree with Fanny...lets choose something where our money makes a difference and they tend to be your less emotive and less pretty charities.
Isn't the problem with charities like helplines or drug support that they need people therefore wages more than anything else. I'd prefer if my money was used for something tangible that would survive to help more people into the future. I think that what was done before will be hard to beat.
When I used to donate to animal charities I started with the smaller more needy ones but soon realised that most of these outfits were snowed under dealing with the consequences of animal cruelty, and if the problem were to be tackled there would need to be changes in the law. In my view the only animal charity with that sort of clout was the RSPCA so I switched to them figuring the more powerful they became the better. My only reservation was that they kept sending me glossy magazines every month whch I felt was wasteful.. Anyway my point is that although the smaller charities seem more deserving it's usually the big ones that get the job done. Just my opinion though, I don't mind who has the money..
whats going on
I wouldn't give the rspca the steam off my ****.
your money is better in local rescue centres imho
Has anyone suggested donating to animal charities...? Sheesh I was only using a past experience to make a point.. The 'fat cats' (lets say NSPCC to save confusion) are the ones with enough clout to get laws changed which, in turn, prevent at least some of the casualties which overwhelm the smaller charities.. big picture.. t'was just a thought.Not animals please.
Not when there are people in need.
Nothing that you'll be interested in. People are going to donate money with no strings attached which will be pooled together to purchase something which will be of benefit rather than donations going to pay for fatcats.
Agreed. Rspca are useless shower of ****s who are only interested in animal welfare if it makes big headlines and thus more donations to pay for the fatcats.
Animal welfare my arse.
more interested in prosecuting people whilst all the time destroying healthy animals.