ImperialCollegeRRproject
New Member
Likewise
Can I have my LRE voucher now?! :cheer2:
If you do a telephone interview with me, yes!
Likewise
Can I have my LRE voucher now?! :cheer2:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLHOK9ic0Rc&app=desktop
This is probably part of the reason RR owners don't go offroad. The only thing it appears to have going for it is, judging by the video at 0:27, its probably one of the most watertight cars LR ever made :hysterically_laughi
The new RR and RRS are simply a world away from what the LR brand used to signify. a 80k+ car with >500bhp that does 0-60 in 5.3 seconds is frankly unnecessary
As all have said, too much electrickery
too much focus on a being a road car for the elite
too much money
in summary its just too much. JLR need to take a step back and consider that Jaguar and Land Rover don't have to have the same focus and target market - in order to cover a broader audience both brands should stick to what they are (were) good at.
But again as others have said it won't and can't happen thanks to EU regs
Personally, I do like the L405, and if I had the money, yes, I would get one, but it would never see mud, I wouldn't think of it as a LR, and it'd have a defender sat next to it on the drive which would actually be used as a land rover, and it wouldn't be a new one with that transit engine.
I think its a waste of time and money for JLR to try making a car into something its not, each model has its purpose. Yes the L405 may be fairly capable offroad but I think time and money should be spent on making it more reliable before trying to make it an 'off-roader'. No-one wants an unreliable off-roader that they can't even repair themselves
Nowt wrong with the Transit engine, better than the M51 in the P38.
EU regs have nothing to do with what is going on. Look at the G Waggen, that is the way the Defender should have evolved.
Do you think that the G Waggen is also a valid alternative to RR?
for what?
storing chickens?
a manned exploration of the moon?
if yu are genuinely wanting help, then you have to put a lot of effort into how your questions are put.
Ive had a a non modded 2.2 through water over the bonnet and it was ok.Admittedly I don't have any experience with the transit engine - but the additional sensors and other ancillary electrics that I'd imagine are on the engine (which I thought was used to confirm with Euro4 regs) cant hold up well when wading??
And I quite liked my M51 engine
The new G wagen I also think has gone a little overboard - Radar guided cruise control?!
Why would you recover off the pillar?https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BLHOK9ic0Rc&app=desktop
This is probably part of the reason RR owners don't go offroad. The only thing it appears to have going for it is, judging by the video at 0:27, its probably one of the most watertight cars LR ever made :hysterically_laughi
The new RR and RRS are simply a world away from what the LR brand used to signify. a 80k+ car with >500bhp that does 0-60 in 5.3 seconds is frankly unnecessary
As all have said, too much electrickery
too much focus on a being a road car for the elite
too much money
in summary its just too much. JLR need to take a step back and consider that Jaguar and Land Rover don't have to have the same focus and target market - in order to cover a broader audience both brands should stick to what they are (were) good at.
But again as others have said it won't and can't happen thanks to EU regs
Personally, I do like the L405, and if I had the money, yes, I would get one, but it would never see mud, I wouldn't think of it as a LR, and it'd have a defender sat next to it on the drive which would actually be used as a land rover, and it wouldn't be a new one with that transit engine.
I think its a waste of time and money for JLR to try making a car into something its not, each model has its purpose. Yes the L405 may be fairly capable offroad but I think time and money should be spent on making it more reliable before trying to make it an 'off-roader'. No-one wants an unreliable off-roader that they can't even repair themselves
im just off to kill myself at the thought of the prospect of this countries future in the engineering industry.
...
oh crap I didnt order the suicide button off JLR!!!!
Am i the perfect target audience for Landrover?
age 21
Vehicles used for
Mountain biking in remote areas
light greenlaning
TOWING boats/work equipment
work duties as a van
load the roof up with longer loads
simpler engineering so i can repair it myself
wash it down after work and go out socializing with mates
ANSWER: NO not for a brand new vehicle as previously stated prices start at £23,000
Summary: Landrover need to make a vehicle which is cheap, easy to repair, and will fit into any scene. A good value for money SUV
!!Landrover website says it all premium 4x4 vehicles and luxury suv's!!
New Landrover Freelander starts @ £27,765
New Suzuki Grand vitara starts @ £15,995
New Nissan X-trail starts @ £22,995
New Mitsubishi outlander starts @ £23,799
New Honda cr-v starts @ £22,000
So Landrover why the big price tag for a british brand to british consumers??? Trying to sell vehicles on the brand name maybe
p.s you can use any of my comments in your studies i wont charge
Which target market do you think the Range Rover should be aimed at? What should it bee good at?