Hippo said:

Seems the Evoque isn’t getting the enthusiasm land rover would have liked, from the peeps who already own other lr models. From the above postings, can I safely assume you lot would rather drive a Freelander than a Evoque?

Click to expand...

rasheed said:

Its looks like a Kia. But probably won't run as well.

Click to expand...

KMCE said:

Somehow I don't think LR give a toss what we think - this is clearly aimed at those who are pretentious enough to want a RR as a status symbol, but cannot afford one, and wouldn't be able to park it in the local supermarket anyway.

Personally, I think the thing looks terrible - based on Freelander, with a lower ride height? That's not a Range Rover :der:

Click to expand...

gfromleeds said:

i think as i town run around fine!! as a rangerover?? lets just say ill eat my hat the first time i see one pulling a horse box with a bale of hay in the boot.
they should drop the rangerover name and just call it the Evoque
its hasnt earned the right to be in the same class as a rangerover. i mean its based on a freelander so surley if its to be named after anything it should be the freelander evoque??

Click to expand...

Hippo said:

So you lot would prefer it to be a land rover evoque, as opposed to being part of the now seperated range rover range of products?

Click to expand...

gfromleeds said:

Exactly
Don't get me wrong it is a good looking car but its got nothing in common with a Rangerove and I can't see it ever been use in the same role as a Rangerover

Click to expand...

wammers said:

Good looking. Are you having a laugh? It's bloody grotesque. You don't also fancy Ann Widdecombe by any chance do you?

Click to expand...

Hippo said:

... as opposed to being part of the now seperated range rover range of products?

Click to expand...

G.P said:

Those people from India and marketing should read some history on Range Rovers.then they will figure our how much dick heads they are!!!!

Click to expand...